User talk:Krauss

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
See also 1, 2

Hello. Edit your message here.

Speedy deletion nomination of Open Contracting[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Open Contracting, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sulfurboy (talk) 23:00, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Open Contracting[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Open Contracting, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JMHamo (talk) 09:23, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Open Contracting for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Open Contracting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Contracting until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 09:38, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi JMHamo, thanks a lot (!), puting back... Can you put back also the talk-page, where was my rationale and I was spending time with a list of references? --Krauss (talk) 09:45, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks JMHamo and others for wait... I try a little bit, but, sorry I abandoned ... Perhas in the future open-contracting.org will more cited and offers more reliable sources pointing there. --Krauss (talk) 12:39, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

October 2015[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Git. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:

  • Be familiar with the guidelines and style
  • Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
  • Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
  • Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
    • Only add a "red link" if used in an article, and include the "blue link" to that article
  • Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
  • Do not insert external links or references

(excuse template) Here's some links to help - I had to revert to fix sections. Widefox; talk 23:07, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

SOLVED --Krauss (talk) 12:39, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you![edit]

Cup-o-coffee-simple.svg Thanks for your contributions to Journal Article Tag Suite. It is well developed for an article on a technical topic. Blue Rasberry (talk) 23:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, see my answer. --Krauss (talk) 12:39, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

SORRY, waiting a proxy voting mechanism in Wikipedia to a real/fairness participation. --Krauss (talk) 12:39, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Black box, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Open system (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

SOLVED --Krauss (talk) 12:39, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Your essay[edit]

I've moved your essay (which isn't really in a state that it's likely to be useful to other editors) from Wikipedia namespace to User:Krauss/Semantic-core boxes. I've also proposed to delete the redirects associated with the essay - here. DexDor (talk) 19:52, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. I've deleted the Wikipedia: namespace redirects to the draft essay. Please do move the essay back to Wikipedia space when it is ready to go! Thanks for preparing design guidance on this type of navboxes. Deryck C. 11:24, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to Homeowner association[edit]

Information.svg Hello, and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the Homeowner association article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:39, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Materialscientist (talk · contribs), I was looking for the correct "advertising text" notice template, and perhaps would fix later. Yes, the best is to use talk page, see this talk --Krauss (talk) 09:28, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Tyranny of the majority "illustrating"[edit]

Hey, I saw your message on my page. I responded about the section you created on the talk page. Fresheneesz (talk) 01:28, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of OpenAIRE[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article OpenAIRE has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:31, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pepper&Carrot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glénat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 7 July 2016 (UTC)