User talk:CesarFelipe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:Kreachure)
Jump to: navigation, search

The Legend of Zelda series[edit]

Hi, you added this paragraph to the article:

The Legend of Zelda was principally inspired by Miyamoto's explorations as a young boy in the forests surrounding his childhood home in Kyoto. Miyamoto has mentioned that several elements of his 'adventures' through those woods were taken into the Zelda games, like a lake he suddenly found one day in the middle of the forest, which at the time surprised him for being a totally new discovery for him, and which according to him, has been a recurrent element in all of the Zelda games (both the lake and the exploration and discovery factors).

It is currently being discussed on Talk:The Legend of Zelda series. Since the lake story was added without a reference, it may be replaced soon with a more reliable statement. --Poiuyt Man (talk) 22:51, 8 May 2005 (UTC)


You should get an award for your revision of the 2012 article. Makes for an entertaining read in the talk pages too. ~Waking

User:Twooars/My Sandbox[edit]

Thanks for taking care of that Categories thing. :P I somehow overlooked the categories. - TwoOars 03:19, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

WikiFun comments[edit]

Hi Kreachure, I responded to you questions on the Wikifun talk page. Hoof Hearted 21:01, 12 November 2007 (UTC)



A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Psychomanteum, because another editor is suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. User:Pedant (talk) 04:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your recent work on this article. User:Pedant (talk) 07:04, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

On the reduction of psychology to neurology[edit]

On the reference desk, you stated that "made the mistake of reducing psychological states to simple physiological and neurological dynamics, when it's definitely not that 'simple.'" There is actually alot of discussion in the contemporary philosophy of science about the relationship between psychology and neurology. Some folks believe they are completely distinct (dualism), some folks say that psychological properties arise from neurological organization (functionalism) and some people believe that once we formulate a strong enough neuroscience, we're going to completely stop talking about the brain in terms of psychological states (emotions, desires, beliefs) and use only neurological terms (Identitity Theory,eliminativism)! If this topic interests you, I strongly suggest you pick up "Matter and Consciousness" by Paul Churchland for a good overview, or "Neurophilosophy" by Patricia Churchland for a more detailed approach. I love this stuff, so thanks for giving me an opportunity to talk about it. --Shaggorama (talk) 22:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Fixing vandalism[edit]

Regarding this edit: Always repair vandalism by locating the last clean version of the article and reverting to it, rather than by editing out the vandalism. When you edit out vandalism, you run the risk of missing some. Worse, by editing out the obvious damage you may obscure the fact that the article was vandalized from other editors, preventing proper repair.--Srleffler (talk) 00:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)


Original Barnstar.png The Original Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.


I do believe this is not a purely technical move. You should use the {{subst:RMtalk|Proposed new name|Reason for move.}} template in a new section of the article's talk page. - UtherSRG (talk) 02:11, 24 March 2012 (UTC)


Hi! Did you see this? The video has the subtitles of the lyrics in ja and its en translation. Oda Mari (talk) 09:18, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)