User talk:Kristielady

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Hello, Kristielady! Welcome to Wikipedia! We're so glad you're here! If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Button sig.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills, the sandbox is for you. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 05:47, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Hello![edit]

I thought you might want to look at this link. Instead of using just links to your references, you may want to use inline citations so they show up in the reference section. If you go to your preferences, and then "gadgets" you will find where you can check a box for "reftools", which you might enjoy. Happy editing. Clamshell Deathtrap (talk) 07:42, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Unsourced speculation[edit]

Please do not add unsourced speculation to wikipedia, as you did to EJ DiMera. Your edits were unsourced, and we don't list what "possibly" happens to characters on histories. This is an encyclopedia, not Soap Opera Digest. Rm994 (talk) 00:06, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

December 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to J.T. Hellstrom, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Petrb (talk) 10:30, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Plot sections[edit]

Kristielady, see WP:PLOT when it comes to adding plot information to articles such as Chloe Mitchell. Plot sections should only be summaries. Though, of course, soap opera characters are going to have longer plot sections than other types of characters.

Also, do not use "&" when speaking of a couple. Use "and" (for example, "Kevin and Chloe"). Flyer22 (talk) 18:50, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Please don't add unecessary pieces of information to plots. If we've read the Rick article, we know Brooke has never liked Amber, etc.
Once again, please do not just add things that really do not apply or help further WP:PLOT. It defeats the article's purpose and is why the articles are in trouble as it is. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:15, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
Once again Kristie, please stop doing day-by-day plot updates. That's not what the plot sections are for. Your edits can be viewed as pure fancraft, and do not help towards WP:PLOT or keeping soap articles keepable. If I have to discuss this again, I will take this to a higher authority. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 02:01, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Please don't[edit]

Please don't add step-parents, nor small text to info boxes. Per WP:SOAPS we do not include either of those. Thank you. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 16:34, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

name changes[edit]

I notice you keep changing Daisy's name, however, there is no proof that either of them have legally had her names changed to Romalotti. So until there is a published report concerning the name changes, please do not change them. Just because somebody married someone else, does not mean they've taken their name. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 00:13, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

July 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 20:37, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

August 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Heather Stevens, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Musicfreak7676 my talk page! 00:38, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Bold and the Beautiful characters (2013), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Spencer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:27, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

February 2015[edit]

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Selena Gomez. PopCrush isn't a reliable source per WP:ALBUM/SOURCES Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:38, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Kristielady. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)