User talk:Kupirijo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

If you want to discuss or see previous discussions on:

Nuvola apps kalzium.png Sciences, click here.
ParthenonRekonstruktion.jpg Humanities, click here.
A coloured voting box.png Politics, click here.

HELP US MAKING THE PROJECT OF ANCIENT GREEK WIKIPEDIA[edit]

We are the promoters of the Wikipedia in Ancient Greek. we need your help, specially for write NEW ARTICLES and the TRANSLATION OF THE MEDIAWIKI INTERFACE FOR ANCIENT GREEK, for demonstrating, to the language subcommittee, the value of our project.

Thanks a lot for your help. Ἡ Οὐικιπαιδεία needs you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.40.197.5 (talk) 19:55, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

RE: Category:Oxazin dyes -> Category:Oxazine dyes[edit]

I have removed your {{move}} tag from the above category as category moves are not performed in this manner. If you are still interested in having this move completed, please visit WP:CFR and follow the procedure outlined there. Thanks. JPG-GR (talk) 02:55, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Actinobacteria[edit]

Thanks for pointing that out. I spend a lot of my time adding photos and taxoboxes, and I'm surprised I haven't had more errors than this one! I'll remove it, and see if I can't find a different image. Bob the Wikipedian, the Tree of Life WikiDragon (talk) 15:59, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Hemicetal image has too many oxygen[edit]

The images in hemiacetal (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hemiacetal_formation.png and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hemiketal_formation.png) have too many oxygen atoms. No water molecule is formed by the nucleophilic addition of an alcohol on a carbonyl group. Would it be possible to correct it? I don't know how to do it myself.

Thank you Knights who say ni (talk) 16:00, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Done. --kupirijo (talk) 11:04, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Inositol pictures[edit]

Hi, I found your nice pictures of the inositol isomers and I have added them to the inositol article.
Would it be hard to split the chiro-inositol picture in two spearate pictures, witjout captions? That would help fixing the layout of that article. (It may also be useful if/when the article on L-chiro-inositol gets created.) Thanks, and all the best, --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 16:33, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Muco-inositol.svg[edit]

File:Muco-inositol.svg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Muco-inositol.svg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Muco-inositol.svg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:40, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Neo-inositol.svg is now available as Commons:File:Neo-inositol.svg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:41, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Allo-inositol.svg is now available as Commons:File:Allo-inositol.svg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:42, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Epi-inositol.svg is now available as Commons:File:Epi-inositol.svg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:42, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Cis-inositol.svg is now available as Commons:File:Cis-inositol.svg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:43, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Chiro-inositol.svg is now available as Commons:File:Chiro-inositol.svg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:44, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Scyllo-inositol.svg is now available as Commons:File:Scyllo-inositol.svg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:44, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Myo-inositol.svg is now available as Commons:File:Myo-inositol.svg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:45, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Undulipodia[edit]

Hi, sorry to get back so late to you about the Undulipodia issue (see my talk page). I think I misunderstood the intent of that sentence. Flagella are always bound by a membrane AFAIK.--♦♦♦Vlmastra♦♦♦ (talk) 00:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:KyriakosTheAnchorite.jpeg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:KyriakosTheAnchorite.jpeg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:07, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

File:5-Carboxyfluorescein.svg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:5-Carboxyfluorescein.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:40, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Categories[edit]

Please do not move categories manually. Each and every category move needs to go through the process of WP:CFD. Courcelles 23:24, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Σκ[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svgTemplate:Σκ has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:31, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cyp[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svgTemplate:Cyp has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:43, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Pantothenic acid2.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pantothenic acid2.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:33, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Do we need a category for phosphine sulfides?[edit]

You are encouraged to interact with the Chem Project about your ambitions for starting categories. This kind of activity has been controversial. Here is the place to discuss your plans: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry.--Smokefoot (talk) 21:05, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Cheers. I will do that next time. --kupirijo (talk) 23:24, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Do not try to force IUPAC on readers[edit]

The chemistry project has discussed this theme extensively. There is little interest in inflicting obscure, cumbersome, and unused nomenclature rules on our readers. I realize that your intentions are good, but we have been over this point many times previously. I also discourage the creation of small categories. You can see (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals#More overspecialized categories) that an effort is underway to clean up micro-categorization efforts by another editor. I urge you to focus your talents on content, not these details that drive readers away and annoy experienced editors. --Smokefoot (talk) 00:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Sorry if I caused any trouble. You mean not to write IUPAC names in the text. But in the chem box is OK, right? --kupirijo (talk) 00:17, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Yes, go ahead and include IUPAC in the chem box and it is fine to mention IUPAC names in the text. But unless IUPAC is widely used, these names should not be in section headers, names of categories, or any other place that forces readers to know this nomenclature. The most recent, fairly heated battle over this point can been seen with the log of User:Plasmic Physics. I remain slightly puzzled that you are not working more on content - how are compounds made, how do they react, their structures, etc. Those items are the heart of our project. Thanks and happy editing. --Smokefoot (talk) 00:42, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks. I am planning on making some structures with ChemDraw soon, i.e. when I find time. --kupirijo (talk) 00:55, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
What I was trying to say was that a focus on IUPAC and categories are essentially useless (or worse) activities as far as most editors and most readers are concerned. I would make a plea for content, meaty stuff like
  • how compounds are made. often there are multiple lab methods and sometimes an industrial routes that have evolved over time.
  • how they react, acid-base (pKa's), redox (potentials), attack by nucleophiles or electrophiles
  • their structures (not drawings). Selected bond lengths and angles, symmetry group (often idealized).
  • their main application and how such applications exploit something about the molecule/material
  • general references to any of the above from textbooks.
Many of the most general articles are lacking core information, if you scroll down the following list (under the Chemistry project) you will find many important articles that are very weak: http://toolserver.org/%7Ealexz/pop/view.php
Good luck, --Smokefoot (talk) 03:41, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

My guess - what you are doing is net hurting Wikipedia[edit]

I dont think that there is any serious support for your editing of naming of compounds. The terms you are inflicting on readers are unfamiliar often to experienced chemists. Wikipedia is not bound to IUPAC, we do not work for them and we are under no expectation to follow their recommendations rigidly. For biochemical molecules, your work could be especially destructive. So, I recommend again that you stop. If you dont know any chemistry and are only able to follow nomenclature books, then you might find another part of Wikipedia where your knowledge is more welcomed and more needed. --Smokefoot (talk) 14:21, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Dear Smokefoot, the IUPAC name that I changed in Coenzyme B is the PIN one. The one listed is not, nevertheless valid. I would say that O-phosphono-N-(7-sulfanylheptanoyl)-L-threonine is more informative (and correct) than 2-[(7-mercapto-1-oxoheptyl)amino]-3-phosphonooxybutanoic acid. I have also cross checked what I wrote with reliable sources (http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.4575352.html). Also, I did not change the name of the article just the field in the infobox named IUPACName and that is all. I do not see your point of me trying to impose IUPAC nomencalture if I am just stating what the IUPAC name is at the designated place. May I suggest to include both? I also disagree with the statement that I am hurting wikipedia, especially when it is in big fonts as a title of a subsection on my user talk page. --kupirijo (talk) 14:50, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed Image Deletion[edit]

A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:57, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Chromone.svg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Chromone.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 02:43, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Quadruple (mathematics)[edit]

Hello, Kupirijo, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, Quadruple (mathematics), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing! JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 00:56, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion[edit]

One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 18:06, 28 November 2011 (UTC).

File:Hemiacetal formation.svg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hemiacetal formation.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:43, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In Ciliate, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Life-cycle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:07, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Multinucleate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Chromera velia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Chlorophyll c
Conoidasida (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Merogony
Haemospororida (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Akiba
Plasmodium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Merogony

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

AfD and PROD notifications[edit]

Hi Kupirijo,

Back in November, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, which was part of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at mpinchuk@wikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 20:05, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Linb-a.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Linb-a.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 22:07, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cyprus Archery Federation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luxemburg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:39, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Fixed it.--kupirijo (talk) 17:41, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Ion channels template[edit]

Hi. Concerning the {{Ion channels}} navbox template, I strongly advise against renumbering the groups within the template unless you have a very good reason for doing this. Every page that transcludes this template, the group is specified so that the appropriate subsection is open up if the navbox if the "show" button is hit. If the groups are renumbered, all the pages that transclude this template will also need to be modified. Boghog (talk) 19:18, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

I see. Is it possible to find out which pages transclude which group? --kupirijo (talk) 02:06, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Yes, the pages are listed in the template. For example, all pages that transclude the {{Ion channels|g4}} template are listed under the group4/abbr4/list4 section of the previous version of the template. A more fundamental question is whether a separate "by transport mechanism" section is desirable or even necessary. All transporters have transport mechanisms. The primary criteria that distinguishes them is what they transport. Secondary criteria may include the gating mechanism (voltage, ligand, etc.), structure (porin vs. non-porins), where they are located (intra or intercellular, e.g., gap junction).
According to WP:NAV, avoid repeating links to the same article within a template. This is especially true for Navboxes like {{Ion channels}} that include collapsible groups since it is only possible to specify a single group in a transcluded template. In short, I think it is important to agree on a single hierarchy within this template. The existing hierarchy has been to first divide by what the transporter transports. If the "other" section is getting too large, it might make sense to create new sections like water (aquaporins), proton, non-selective cation, anion, etc. What do you think? Boghog (talk) 10:02, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
I like the idea of creating new sections like water, proton, anion etc. The way it is currently presented is not consistent with a single hierarchy especially the "other" section representing a hotchpotch of random stuff. --kupirijo (talk) 00:32, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
On second thought, there were a few links that probably do belong in their own "by gating mechanism section", so I have split these out into a new section. I have also extensively edited the "miscellaneous" section so hopefully it now is better organized. How does it look now? Boghog (talk) 21:55, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Much better! A few comments: should "CNC cation channel" read "CNG cation channel"? Also ... Are all porins permeable only specifically to water? Thanks. --kupirijo (talk) 23:33, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for catching the GNG type which has now been corrected. I also added "(+ solutes)" to the description of what is transported by (some) porins. Finally I specified that gap junctions transport cytoplasm. Boghog (talk) 07:16, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. Also we could change the last group to a non-expandable one. What do you think? --kupirijo (talk) 22:03, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of liqueurs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Proof (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 9 August 2013 (UTC)