This user interacts with Wikipedia using outdated equipment and at sometimes their output may appear strange. Please try to assume good faith, this user only wishes to help build the encyclopedia. If you have any questions or concerns, please see my talk. –xeno (talk) 03:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC) ... if Xeno is not around, please contact me. --Floquenbeam (talk) 02:17, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The issue seems to be your edit summaries, which are incomprehensible. Huon (talk) 10:49, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
July 2012 ; « A 2008 study found that Wikipedians were lower in agreeableness, openness, and conscientiousness than non-Wikipedia users. »[edit]
You have been blockedindefinitely from editing for your apparent inability to communicate meaningfully with others, and for your otherwise problematic and/or incomprehensible contributions. See the AN discussion. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Sandstein 13:48, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hopiakuta, I recognized your name in the discussion at WP:Administrators' noticeboard. I think I remember you have some significant accessibility issues, but I cannot recall the details. I'm not sure if there is anything I can do to help, but if you'd like me to try to help you resolve this, let me know. I am not very active, so it may take a while for me to reply. I will watch this page, you can reply here if you want to. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:00, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank You.
First, I do want to reference my first several edits, about Deon Baptiste & Ian Baptiste, which are currently linked in my signature, then, the pages @ user : persina, then, later, I would like to review what I have most recently been accused of.
A synthesis of humor and solemnity is an excellent way to live one's life. It may not be such a great way to edit Wikipedia, though. For example, my friend User:Proofreader77 was blocked indefinitely for mixing humor and solemnity too much. Wikipedia can be a pretty unwelcoming place for that particular combination.
First things first, though. You know you can be very difficult to understand, right? I think the majority of the people who recommended you be blocked did so more because of that, than because of any other reasons. I don't mean to pry or insult, but how much of this is by choice, and how much is due to your accessibility issues?
I get the impression that at least some of this is due to humor that is going over peoples' heads (including mine). Very few people on Wikipedia enjoy having to think hard in order to puzzle out other people's meaning. I'm practically a saint, and even I find it aggrevating at times.
As for Bling_Crosby, I don't know its history; it's been deleted and I'm not an administrator anymore, so I can't see it either. However, it was evidently created by another user, and doesn't seem to have anything to do with you. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:08, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Despite the fact that I had gotten the page moved, it remains okay to label two disabledAfrocaribbean men doppelgänger communist vandal sockpuppet. I continue to wish that I could warn them of that. Since that had been the basis of my original registration, I am obsessed by it.
I have written a lot about how hiding her identity could be construed as a further insult. Regarding « Bling Crosby » or any other issue, I do seek, much as she had, to defend agaist libel.
I am not capable of reviewing his, proofread's, overall history; but, I can see by that one example that our histories do diverge dramatically. I am glad to learn of proofread; but, we are different. Also, I cannot figure what his name is; my name is all over my userspace.
« ...by choice, and how much is due to,... »‽ Physical disability, emotional disability & cognitive disability are difficult to detangle. I do perceive the distinction of nature versus nurture as, @ least partially, missing the point. I do perceive the distinction of capitalism versus socialism as, @ least partially, missing the point. Despite my disability, my left arm needs my right arm, as my right arm needs my left arm. My malfunctioning brain needs my heart & lungs, which, in turn, require a brain, even a bad one.
I did not coin this quote: « A 2008 study found that Wikipedians were lower in agreeableness, openness, and conscientiousness than non-Wikipedia users. »
Yes, if you cannot change the things you cannot change, and choose not to change the things you can change, then nature vs nurture is missing the point. It really only mattered if you wanted to change the way you edit here to improve your chances of getting unblocked.
I don't really understand what you mean about Deon and Ian Baptiste (except I gather that they are the "disabled Afrocaribbean men"?)
Oh yes, you and Proofreader are definitely unique in your own unique ways. I didn't mean to imply differently.
I am not at all surprised by that 2008 study. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:35, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I do think that you had misunderstood that comment entirely:
Deon & Ian had been libeled on this website; that is why I had registered, primarily. It remains policy that this can recur, & that none of you had ever warned them & I do not know how to.
I had never had an account prior to having seen their photograph, & calling it to various persons' attention. As you can see in that early edit, I had not yet learned how to create a discussionpage: so, I simply placed the alert @ the bottom of the policy page &, I, also, had corrected some spelling in that edit.
I feel that there must be more pages like that one & one of you shall, eventually, in all likelihood, get someone assassinated in that fashion, someone who who has never written one character on any wikimedia website, someone who does not deserve it & does not want it.
I had argued against people who had sought to bury the name Sam Geimer.
You had asked « ...by choice, and how much is due to,... »; so, that entire paragraph had been about various metaphoric examples of how each are intertwined. Whatever you had said about that paragraph does not make sense to me.
Whatever you have just said, in the most recent comment before this one, does seem entirely incorrect compared to what I had said.
After some research and detective work, I see now who Deon and Ian Baptiste are; I think you were correct in having that picture removed, but over-estimate the damage that was done.
Also, I don't think the name Samantha Geimer is "buried"; it redirects to Roman Polanski sexual abuse case, where she is prominently mentioned. If she also went by "Sam" Geimer, then a redirect at Sam Geimer makes sense; if she didn't go by that name, then a redirect isn't needed.
I thought I understood you re: nature vs. nurture, but I guess not. My point was, I hope you are unblocked, and when you are, I hope you will make as much of an effort as possible to be easier to understand, without losing your sense of humor. Or sense of solemnity. At the very least, please understand that many people, who are not evil or dumb, do have a difficult time understanding everything you're saying. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:36, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The dispute about Ms. Geimer had never been about any redirect; but, it had been regarding people who had, a few years ago, wanted to delete her name entirely, who did not even want it on a discussionpage.
Despite that, I have searched Sam, & most of the results do seem to indicate Polanski.
Regarding Mr. Gallego: I could change it to "the last time that he is mentioned in a document is in 2012", but I think what they are probably trying to say is "the last time he was refered to in a document which implied he was still alive was in 1507."
Regarding the other millions of ridiculous claims on this website: Yes, that's true, part and parcel of being an encyclopedia anyone can edit. Some of the claims are quite hippoposterous. It helps if you keep in mind that it's just a work in progress. Perfection is expected to be achieved sometime before the sun becomes a red giant. If errors really annoy you, stick to reading Featured Articles. Many of them are really quite excellent.--Floquenbeam (talk) 00:37, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
hopiakuta is sometimes misunderstood... he means well.
The Web Accessibility laurel
For your efforts over the years to make Wikipedia more welcoming to all people, I award you the Web Accessibility laurel. Here are some fine examples of your efforts -
I don't have as much time on Wikipedia as I used to, be please let me know if I can be of any assistance. –xenotalk 01:43, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am putting this here as an archive of what you had begun it with, in order that I might figure the meaning of it all:
hopiakuta is sometimes miunderstood... he means well.
The Web Accessibility laurel
For your efforts over the years to make Wikipedia more welcoming to all people, I award you the Accessibility barnstar. Here are fine examples of Hopiakuta's efforts -
I don't have as much time on Wikipedia as I used to, be please let me know if I can be of any assistance. –xenotalk 01:43, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is not directly related; I am simply adding this for separate various reasons, although national color is common:
I've unblocked your account Hopiakuta (or do you prefer to be called Persina, or DonFphrnqTaub Persina?). There was no consenus to keep the block, and no consensus to overturn it, and I believe where there is no consensus either way, the default should be to unblock. I've added my name to the box that User:Xeno put on top of your page, and will keep an eye on this talk page. However, I will not be watching every edit, so if there is a question or comment directed at me, please edit my talk page: User talk:Floquenbeam.
To be honest, I too am confused about this edit you made: [1], which apparently started the whole mess. We generally do not add a "see also" for non-existent articles, nor articles that sound similar to the article name. The "see also" section is for articles on a related subject, not homophones or partial-homophones.
I'm hopeful that you won't have any similar issues in the future. Please remember that people have a hard time understanding you sometimes, and make allowances for that in your responses to them. They are neither evil nor stupid because they can't clearly understand where you're coming from.
I believe you should be able to edit now. If you cannot (sometimes the software has a glitch), please note that here. --Floquenbeam (talk) 02:25, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am in complete quandary, as I assume that if I make any new comment beyond userspace or noticeboard, or revive an old comment, I would, again, lose my account function. &, I assume worse for any alternate account as well.
I am acting as if none of my accounts have any function.
& there is this persistent malware accusation; I have offered a comparison with a message that I have just received, which you can find in my * today * history.
Hello, Hopiakuta. You have new messages at Persina's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
DonFphrnqTaub Persina,
First things first. I don't think you should post anymore at the noticeboard. There is unlikely anything you can say there to help your case. People who are already convinced you are a troll will see every post you make that they don't understand as proof they are right. Confirmation bias. Those who believe you are not trolling will see every post you make that they can sort of understand as proof they are right. Confirmation bias again. Since those who think you are trolling evidently feel more strongly about this than those who don't, posting to the noticebaord now can only harm your case.
I should be clear that I hope you remain unblocked, but I don't guarantee it, and I am unsure what I actually expect to happen.
It is unfortunate that there will be several people watching your every post in article space, ready to pounce and say "aha! see? he's incomprehensible". I cannot change that situation. It is quite possible you will end up blocked because of it, and I cannot help that. The best I can suggest is to carefully consider each edit, and do what you think is best for the encyclopedia. If you see an edit you think is within policies and makes the encyclopedia better, make it. If you are right, great. If you are wrong, it will be reverted. If you are wrong repeatedly, then perhaps a block is unavoidable. If someone reverts an edit you made, don't reinstate it. Respond to bad faith with good faith, and let me know if you have an issue with someone that I can help clarify.
Other comments:
The malware accusation can be ignored *as long as* you don't repost the link to your blog on Wikipedia.
There is already a Wikipedia:WikiProject Accessibility; I cannot help make this place more accessible for you, or start a different disability access project for you; for one thing, I still don't understand what your access problems are. For another, I have limite time for Wikipedia.
Xeno appears to have retired from editing here.
I'm going to leave the other accounts blocked for now; there's no need to use them.
I will look at your comments re: Stericycle later.
Good luck and edit carefully. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:03, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Even prior to my first edit, some six years ago, I had hoped that the wikimedia complaints had been exaggeration; this month has proven them all as meiosis, which I have learned here, only because I have carefully searched for it, & which has a different definition @ wiktionary : meiosis.
Despite whatever is good here, it does not justify its existence.
Regarding your question about me, whether I violate anything; is it about my joke on my user page regarding the public lavatory attendant? If it is, then no, because I don't think it's an offensive joke. Regarding user:Niemti, the "I like turtles" on his page is from this viral video. [2]. {od}, the crooked line, is for separating replies when there are too many indents ( ::::::: ), too many indents make the replies go further and further to the right of the page and the {od} moves a reply back to the left of the page. Acoma Magic (talk) 18:19, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No, oh, please, wait, I am so sorry, there I am misunderstood again.
Yes, that's the joke. Theme and meme are quite different. The meaning of theme varies, for example it is different for books or music. In a general sense, a theme is attached to, for example, violence. "The book had a theme of violence" is an example. That means that violence is in the book, perhaps prominently or just in the background. A meme is a practise or idea that has spread and people in a culture know about it. For example, "I like turtles" can be described as a meme. It has spread through a culture and a lot of people know about it. Acoma Magic (talk) 06:57, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank You.
We have a different definition. I think that meme is merely slightly narrower than theme is. Neither one is more peaceful, in my perspective.
Until your message, & Niemti, I had thought of turtles regarding my pets, one of which is, some movies, televison series[es],...... Then, I saw that boy. But, then again, it took four years & fifty weeks to reach me; so, as it is very popular in some groups, it was not a sufficiently strong meme, nor a strong enough theme, to reach me in less than two years.
Hello again. Your signature has a link to my user page. I don't mind it being there but I thought I should let you know, just in case you added it accidentally. Acoma Magic (talk) 05:58, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the signature links to Special:MyPage, so it isn't yours in particular it links to, Acoma. Hopiakuta, if you intended that to be a link to your own userpage, you should replace:
Certainly, not about singular you [ versus plural you ]. But, there are many administrators who attack for a variety of reasons; but, allot themselves huge exemptions.
No one could really complain about it in your own user space. I certainly wouldn't care if you used it outside user space, but... yes, it could easily be used as ammunition by people who seek to prove you're "disruptive". Not sure you'd want to make it so easy for them. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:08, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I do assume that everything that Don does, including, especially, seeking to distinguish my screenname identity from my actual identity, is construed as violation; but, I do infer that most of what they accuse me of has not yet been written into anything.
« Koch writes: “You may be interested in the information that we uncovered on the insurance and other benefits that would be available to you in this country. Since you have paid into the United States Social Security Program for a full forty quarters, you are entitled to Social Security payments while living anywhere in the Free World. Also, at any time you are in the United States, you are automatically entitled to hospital coverage.”
« Then, taking on the unlikely role of Social Security Administration customer service rep, Koch adds, “In order to be eligible for medical coverage you must apply during the registration period which is anytime from January 1 to March 31. For your further information, I am enclosing a pamphlet on Social Security.” »
« As part of Cato’s campaign, the institute has launched various groups and projects, including the Project on Social Security Choice, whose co-chair is José Piñera, architect of Augusto Pinochet’s controversial pension privatization scheme in Chile. Cato Institute members and alumni also dominated President George W. Bush’s commission on Social Security in his first term and spearheaded Bush’s failed attempt to privatize the program in the early months of his second term. »
« Unfortunately, the militarism and the promiscuous intervention it gives rise to are only likely to abate when the Treasury is exhausted, just as it happened to the Dutch Republic and the British Empire. »
« ‽ »
« If you think Paul Ryan and his Ayn Rand-worshipping colleagues aren't after your Social Security and Medicare, I am here to disabuse you of your naiveté. They will move heaven and earth to force through tax cuts that will so starve the government of revenue that they will be "forced" to make "hard choices" - and that doesn't mean repealing those very same tax cuts, it means cutting the benefits for which you worked. »
« ‽ »
« The GOP cult of Ayn Rand is both revealing and mystifying. On the one hand, Rand's tough guy, every-man-for-himself posturing is a natural fit because it puts a philosophical gloss on the latent sociopathy so prevalent among the hard right. On the other, Rand exclaimed at every opportunity that she was a militant atheist who felt nothing but contempt for Christianity. Apparently, the ignorance of most fundamentalist "values voters" means that GOP candidates who enthuse over Rand at the same time they thump their Bibles never have to explain this stark contradiction. And I imagine a Democratic officeholder would have a harder time explaining why he named his offspring "Marx" than a GOP incumbent would in rationalizing naming his kid "Rand." »
« So tonight I announce the Advanced Energy Initiative -- a 22 percent increase in clean-energy research at the Department of Energy to push for breakthroughs in two vital areas. To change how we power our homes and offices, we will invest more in zero-emission coal-fired plants; revolutionary solar and wind technologies; and clean, safe nuclear energy.
« We must also change how we power our automobiles.
« We will increase our research in better batteries for hybrid and electric cars and in pollution-free cars that run on hydrogen. »
« ‽ »
« Tonight I ask you to pass legislation to prohibit the most egregious abuses of medical research: human cloning in all its forms; creating or implanting embryos for experiments; creating human-animal hybrids; and buying, selling or patenting human embryos. »
Nonsense: « Noravank church and canyon, as well as Areni wine country are in the wrong direction, but quite worthwhile. Yeghegnadzor has a few monuments in the surrounding area, but some are harder to access. Boloraberd, Spitakavor, Mozrov Caves, and such are not so easily accessible. A bit outside of Yeghegnadzor however are the ruins of Glazdor University and the adjoining monastery. »
« Faithful to the 'self-evident' truths enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, we assert the sanctity of human life and affirm that the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed. We support a human life amendment to the Constitution and endorse legislation to make clear that the Fourteenth Amendment's protections apply to unborn children. »
Not sure what just happened here, but I see you're blocked again. Unfortunately I have absolutely no time this weekend to do anything Wiki-related, but since you've been mostly editing your talk page the last few weeks anyway, I imagine it won't be the end of the world if everything waits until Monday. --Floquenbeam (talk) 13:34, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry to see things went this bad; I guess things are irreversible now. Once you came to the attention of the hyenas at WP:ANI, the writing was on the wall. Anyway, thanks for 6 years and 6000 edits. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:52, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thanks for the time you spend improving Wikipedia, you can be proud of it really. I did not found a way to write a convincing enough unblock request, as many editors and admins were not even trying to investigate anymore, they wanted a hasty decision. So I can't do much about your block, but I feel sad about it. I know you put your heart into this, and you probably feel bad at the moment. I thank you for your efforts and participation, and I wish you the best. Yours, Dodoïste (talk) 16:20, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
User talk:71.102.35.65, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:71.102.35.65 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User talk:71.102.35.65 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Nouniquenames (talk) 21:52, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you'd like to request an unblock, please contact the Arbitration committee via their e-mail: arbcom-appeals-enlists.wikimedia.org. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:25, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
User:Hopiakuta/ ∴, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hopiakuta/ ∴ and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Hopiakuta/ ∴ during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:46, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Bhuto requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. StAnselm (talk) 03:20, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Peruse, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 03:10, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Peruse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bongan®→TalkToMe← 14:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Other use. Since you had some involvement with the Other use redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 03:13, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Handicrap. Since you had some involvement with the Handicrap redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Tavix(talk) 04:15, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mars won. Since you had some involvement with the Mars won redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Tavix(talk) 05:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
North Atlantic Treaty Organisation Organisation du Traité de l'Atlantique Nord listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Edmund Reade. Since you had some involvement with the Edmund Reade redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION(talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:44, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect O'bama. Since you had some involvement with the O'bama redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION(talk) (contributions) (logs) 06:41, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Washin. Since you had some involvement with the Washin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — JFGtalk 16:28, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Openserving. Since you had some involvement with the Openserving redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:33, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wk42lawzt. Since you had some involvement with the Wk42lawzt redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. WCQuidditch☎✎ 23:54, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tont. Since you had some involvement with the Tont redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question(in question) 19:58, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Andy Stepanian requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.balestramedia.com/team. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Calton | Talk 09:25, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Keep ass. Since you had some involvement with the Keep ass redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:55, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
![thumb | don't do it! [ 30 April 2006 ]](/wiki/File:DoNotFeedTroll.svg){kind=link}
lists.wikimedia.org. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:25, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
