User talk:LABcrabs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

May 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Template:Canadian mobile network operators. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Me-123567-Me (talk) 02:32, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Coast to coast (Canadian mobile network)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Coast to coast (Canadian mobile network) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Me-123567-Me (talk) 02:35, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:Canadian mobile phone companies. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Me-123567-Me (talk) 20:08, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

It doesn't matter what you or I believe. It's what consensus is about the article. That's why each article has a talk page, and the coast to coast deletion has its own discussion page which you can participate in. Me-123567-Me (talk) 20:16, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppets[edit]

Hello... FYI, while it is great that you're declaring your sockpuppets, there is no real need (and the potential for confusion) in creating socks solely to work on topic areas that your main account is also working in. Cheers. --Ckatzchatspy 05:31, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Love All the Way[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Love All the Way has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, non-charting song. Fails WP:NSONG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravendrop 23:11, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Zeddy.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Zeddy.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:02, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

  • Works for me. Thanks! (ESkog)(Talk) 17:07, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In Snow Miser, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Tooth & Nail (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Bell TV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Worst-case scenario (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Nice changes to the Skillet articles[edit]

It's good to see them cleaned-up and filled-out. However, could you keep WP:NUMERO in mind when adding chart positions. I've standardized on "No. " across the articles I edit (Christian music articles) particularly the Skillet articles, so if you could avoid add "#1" or "number one", that would help with consistency. If not, I'll likely come in and "fix" them later. Thanks again for the research and hard work in improving the articles. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:56, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Jump5 discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All the Time in the World (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

February 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Even If (ZOEgirl song), please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 03:21, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 29[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Rental shop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cassette (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Open Mic Karaoke[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Open Mic Karaoke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:MUSIC.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 01:13, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of New Release Tuesday for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Release Tuesday is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Release Tuesday until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Proposed deletion of Open Mic Karaoke[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Open Mic Karaoke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not able to be established.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- DanielKlotz (talk · contribs) 02:11, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Zellers[edit]

This is regarding the Boxing week sale part and Youtube 'controversy' part of the article you added.

The Youtube part has been completely removed because it violates Wikipedia's Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth policy. Youtube commentators are not sources. Wikipedia has a policy that Verifiability is most important.

Regarding the Boxing week sale addition, much of it was rewritten. A lot of what you wrote was never in the article you cited. This violates Wikipedia's Wikipedia:No original research. You can't do your own research and post it on wikipedia articles. You can only post 'articles' findings.

Please be familiar with those two policies as they are an integral part of Wikipedia.--Everyone Dies In the End (talk) 09:39, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Re:Why did you un-nominate Zellers.jpg for deletion?[edit]

Re:Why did you un-nominate Zellers.jpg for deletion?

Bulwersator (talk) 13:51, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Zellers.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Zellers.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bulwersator (talk) 13:52, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Zeddy.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Zeddy.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:56, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Followup RFC to WP:RFC/AAT now in community feedback phase[edit]

Hello. As a participant in Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion article titles, you may wish to register an opinion on its followup RFC, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion advocacy movement coverage, which is now in its community feedback phase. Please note that WP:RFC/AAMC is not simply a repeat of WP:RFC/AAT, and is attempting to achieve better results by asking a more narrowly-focused, policy-based question of the community. Assumptions based on the previous RFC should be discarded before participation, particularly the assumption that Wikipedia has or inherently needs to have articles covering generalized perspective on each side of abortion advocacy, and that what we are trying to do is come up with labels for that. Thanks! —chaos5023 20:30, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Summer? When's summer[edit]

Please see WP:SEASON. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:58, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, LABcrabs. You have new messages at Walter Görlitz's talk page.
Message added 23:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

May 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Toronto Transit Commission may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:19, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback @ user:jerem43[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, LABcrabs. You have new messages at Jerem43's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Canadian video rental shops[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svgTemplate:Canadian video rental shops has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 22:50, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Barlow Girls[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Barlow Girls has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet WP:NSONGS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:36, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Barlow Girls for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barlow Girls is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barlow Girls until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:42, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Entertaining Angels single.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Entertaining Angels single.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

DRN Filing[edit]

Please list and notify the other editors who have been discussing BarlowGirl. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:06, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, LABcrabs. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

The BarlowGirl Dispute[edit]

After you complained about the handling of the BarlowGirl dispute, I have looked at its editing history and yours in more detail. I see that you have a history of editing Wikipedia for a period of time, then taking a break, and then coming back. That is entirely acceptable, but taking long breaks from editing will interfere with resolution of disputes, which may require discussion for a period of time. You complained to me on my talk page that you had taken a break from editing Wikipedia to avoid the drama, but you started the drama. You need to decide whether you want to edit Wikipedia only when you feel like it, which is fine, but doesn't resolve any disputes in your favor, or that you will follow disputes through to resolution. You are welcome to re-open a discussion of BarlowGirl, but you will need to list the editors in the case header, and to take part in the discussion long enough (maybe two weeks) to resolve the issue. Also, it would be useful to avoid having your edits display anger (and your edits display a lot of anger). Anger is human, but people on the other side of the screen are also human and can be turned off by anger. You may refile at DRN if you wish. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:47, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Tommy2[edit]

First, no byline that I can see so the source fails RS. Did you read what was written? You saw that the Lady Gaga song was performed by Supercic[k], not BarlowGirl, right? So now being on the bill with someone who performs a song is an influence. Stop pushing this nonsense. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello Walter. If you read and cross-reference, you would know that Superchic[k] (brackets optional) is a notable artist in terms of BarlowGirl's history and success. Yes, BarlowGirl is on the hook for allowing the Black Eyed Peas and Lady Gaga to be played at the BarlowGirl & Superchick Live tour in 2009. Notice how the first name listed is BarlowGirl. If it was Superchick, you might have a case, but you don't. These bands talk together about organizing the event. If they really had an issue with Gaga or BEP, they would have sorted it out instead of allowing it on the tour's third (?) show. The news site is maintained by Tommy Ramirez and was used on Wikipedia before, so there is no issue. I am asking you to stop removing content that was originally removed by a PAID BarlowGirl staff member. If you continue removing this content, I will ask Wikipedia to examine your motives. --LABcrabs (talk) 16:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
I did read it and you stated that Supercic[k] performed the music and because they were on the same bill as them, somehow that means that Lady Gaga is an influence. Now you are suggesting that the band influenced or could prevent Supercic[k] from performing the song. If they had an issue. No of course they don't have an issue with Lady Gaga, you do, and you are grasping at straws. Sticky to facts not innuendo. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:38, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:51, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

The BarlowGirl article is covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:BLPSE[edit]

Commons-emblem-notice.svg This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

EdJohnston (talk) 17:12, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed topic ban[edit]

It appears that the ANI thread may not reach a conclusion on whether a community ban should be issued in your case, but I have pointed out that you could be subject to a ban under WP:BLPSE if further problems occur. If you do intend to keep editing this article, my suggestion is to try to get consensus on the talk page for any further changes before making them. A BLPSE ban would not be retroactive, but could be issued if you make any more problematic edits. The best way to avoid this is to be sure you have consensus. Thank you EdJohnston (talk) 19:51, 28 May 2017 (UTC)