User talk:Ladislav Mecir
A barnstar for you!
|The Teamwork Barnstar|
|Thank you for keeping Bitcoin in shape. you are an awesome wikipedian ! Wuerzele (talk) 20:13, 10 September 2015 (UTC)|
A barnstar for you!
|The Barnstar of Diligence|
|Ladislav, thanks much for improving and maintaining legality of bitcoin working with Fleetham, so it has become useful and reliable ! Wuerzele (talk) 15 October 2015 (UTC)|
Are you watching Bitcoin Core? I've expanded it by a factor of more than 10 over the last week. Could you check it and never-mind about that. His heart is mostly in a good place. - Shiftchange (talk) 10:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Move of "first blockchain implemenatation" to history paragraph
Hi Ladislav Mecir, just saw that you put back the paragraph on blockchain_(database) starting with "The first blockchain was conceptualised ..." to its former place. I enhanced the history section today and found that the above paragraph makes better sense in a chronological context. So I put it down to the history section, but neither deleted nor changed it. What speaks against moving it to the history? With your restore we have a duplicate paragraph now. Best --W w smith (talk) 18:29, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hello, W w smith. Your edit putting the information to the history section is an improvement, since, indeed, it should be present there. Also, per WP:MOS, the informations in the lead section should be the most important informations discussed in the article body. Therefore, it is not a problem that the information is both in the lead section and in the history section. Ladislav Mecir (talk) 06:24, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
- Fair point. Thanks. --W w smith (talk) 16:25, 30 November 2016 (UTC) Ladislav Mecir, quick additional question reading the full article again. Wouldn't the work of Adam Back on Hashcash qualify to also be mentioned on the history section on top? Wdyt? --W w smith (talk) 16:50, 30 November 2016 (UTC)