User talk:Ladislav Mecir

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

A barnstar for you![edit]

Team Barnstar Hires.png The Teamwork Barnstar
Thank you for keeping Bitcoin in shape. you are an awesome wikipedian ! Wuerzele (talk) 20:13, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstar of Diligence Hires.png The Barnstar of Diligence
Ladislav, thanks much for improving and maintaining legality of bitcoin working with Fleetham, so it has become useful and reliable ! Wuerzele (talk) 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Bitcoin Core[edit]

Are you watching Bitcoin Core? I've expanded it by a factor of more than 10 over the last week. Could you check it and never-mind about that. His heart is mostly in a good place. - Shiftchange (talk) 10:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Ladislav Mecir. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Move of "first blockchain implemenatation" to history paragraph[edit]

Hi Ladislav Mecir, just saw that you put back the paragraph on blockchain_(database) starting with "The first blockchain was conceptualised ..." to its former place. I enhanced the history section today and found that the above paragraph makes better sense in a chronological context. So I put it down to the history section, but neither deleted nor changed it. What speaks against moving it to the history? With your restore we have a duplicate paragraph now. Best --W w smith (talk) 18:29, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, W w smith. Your edit putting the information to the history section is an improvement, since, indeed, it should be present there. Also, per WP:MOS, the informations in the lead section should be the most important informations discussed in the article body. Therefore, it is not a problem that the information is both in the lead section and in the history section. Ladislav Mecir (talk) 06:24, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Fair point. Thanks. --W w smith (talk) 16:25, 30 November 2016 (UTC) Ladislav Mecir, quick additional question reading the full article again. Wouldn't the work of Adam Back on Hashcash qualify to also be mentioned on the history section on top? Wdyt? --W w smith (talk) 16:50, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
To your question whether hashcash should be mentioned in the history section - yes, I guess that it deserves to be mentioned. Ladislav Mecir (talk) 08:58, 1 December 2016 (UTC)