User talk:Largoplazo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Thanks for reviewing Grupo paranga, Largoplazo.

Unfortunately Jackmcbarn has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Article has a lot of issues other than the COI, so it needs further review (and quite possibly tagging for deletion)

To reply, leave a comment on Jackmcbarn's talk page.

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Thanks for reviewing Evans Sylvestre, Largoplazo.

Unfortunately Josu4u has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

I think someone needs to review this, whether it meets speedy deletion or not.

To reply, leave a comment on Josu4u's talk page.

Futuristic[edit]

brooooooooooooooooooo, I took 1-2 total hours on that page instead of doing the homework.

Sorry[edit]

I appreciate towards your efforts in Wikipedia, I am Sorry for what I have done.
Sincerely:
Pakelectrical talk 21 May 2016 (UTC)

FOGEL GROUP page[edit]

Hi Largoplazo, thank you for the heads up about deleting of the page.

First, I'm really sorry if the article didn't meet with Wikipedia's guideline. Rest assured it wasn't my intention to violate those guidelines. I still have no clear which rules I didn't comply with.

The company I work for (FOGEL GROUP www.fogel-group.com) has entitled me to create a Wikipedia page about our company which has currently 1000+ employees and presence on 50+ countries around the world.

We want to create this article for people all over the world to be informed about the company, absolutely no advertising purposes are intended.

Therefor, in order to comply with your guidelines and create the best informative content possible, can you please help me creating the page in the correct way? I can send you the information for your review and you can tell me how to proceed from there. I see many companies pages on Wikipedia such as PepsiCo, The Coca Cola Company, Anheuser Busch InBev to name a few which happens to be our customers as well.

Thank you very much for your help, and hope to hear from you soon.

Kind Regards.

Otto. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MktFoca (talkcontribs) 18:17, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi there. Well ... for a company to have an article written about itself to inform the world about it is advertising, by definition. The article as you wrote it was clearly written to give a good impression of the company. Wikipedia articles, even though they will list a topic's accomplishments and awards, maintain a neutral tone and point of view, including avoidance of peacock language.
Also, you are writing with a conflict of interest, which is strongly discouraged, though permitted. Wikipedia isn't meant to be used by authors for their own ends, not being a social media or networking site like Facebook or LinkedIn. But if you go ahead with this, you need to pay strict heed to the guidelines at WP:COI, including adding a {{connected contributor (paid)}} tag to the article's Talk page, and so forth.
Certainly, there are articles on many companies here—ideally, written by people who are independent of those companies, just as whoever wrote an article on lactobacillus has no conflict of interest with respect to the lactobacillus. Also keep in mind that articles have to be about topics that meet the guidelines for what Wikipedia calls notability. For a company, these are the general notability guidelines and guidelines specific to corporations and other organizations. If Fogel Group isn't notable, then an article on it here will probably end up deleted anyway. Largoplazo (talk) 18:27, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

copyvio[edit]

Please see report here CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

OK, thanks. I didn't see that content myself when I looked at the Facebook page but, of course, a lot is hidden on those pages until you click the right "show more" links. It's also the same material that I removed as promotional however, so, assuming the page isn't deleteable for other reasons, those versions will need to be revdel'ed. Largoplazo (talk) 19:04, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Sandro suzart[edit]

Hello Largoplazo. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sandro suzart, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:42, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jewish diaspora[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jewish diaspora. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 22 April 2017 (UTC)


Lorin O'Neil Caccamise[edit]

Please be mindful of WP:BITE when reviewing articles like this one. The three edits that started this article were the editor's first three edits of any kind. Their fourth edit was to go to the Help Desk and ask what they were doing wrong. All within their first hour of editing. I'm not saying that your analysis of the article is wrong, necessarily - just that sometimes WP:AGF comes into play as well. FYI. Thanks. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 19:03, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

I understand WP:BITE and WP:AGF, but I'm not sure where they come into it. The subject of the article, I believe, doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. If that's true, then the article does need to be deleted. New editors sometimes ask me directly "What was wrong?" after I submit and article for deletion, and I explain, nicely, that Wikipedia has requirements that articles and their topics have to meet. If a new editor writes an article about a topic that doesn't qualify, it's the guidelines that are creating the disappointment. Largoplazo (talk) 19:07, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
I think BITE came into play when the editor got warned that their article is up for deletion before they got welcomed. Many many first articles get nominated for deletion, as you know - and most of them (correctly) end up deleted. We bite the new editors when they get the impression that the problem is them, rather than their subject. We even have a template for this - {{First_article}} - that refers specifically to the fact that their first article probably ain't gonna work. Like I said, just something to think about in the future. Best. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 19:29, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing that out. I've been fuzzy on when Twinkle posts Welcome messages automatically in conjunction with other actions and when it doesn't. I'll pay closer attention to that. Largoplazo (talk) 20:03, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
No worries. Thanks. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 12:47, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Uesr:Meters/OPNsense[edit]

Thanks for moving that. it would be nice if I could spell my own username! Meters (talk) 21:53, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:John Fleming (American politician)[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:John Fleming (American politician). Legobot (talk) 04:34, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of scandals with "-gate" suffix[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of scandals with "-gate" suffix. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 29 April 2017 (UTC)