User talk:Laszlo Panaflex
|This is Laszlo Panaflex's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Laszlo Panaflex.|
|Archives: 1, 2|
New update about Silk Road.
The Silk Road is now found as 35,000 Kilometer's according to Nation Geographic after recent discovery. I'm sorry if i changed it unexpectedly but it needed to be updated. Jeffwood2001 (talk) 19:36, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Jeffwood2001: Please see the discussion at Talk:Silk_Road#Length regarding this issue. There are a number of different distances listed in sources for the extent of the route. However it is unclear whether they mean the length from east to west or if they include various off-shoots. The route was also different lengths in different periods, and it eventually includes sea routes as well. As a result the length has been removed from the page as the sources vary and appear to be imprecise. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 20:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Sourced to what?
- File:Structure of the First Bulgarian Empire during the IX-X century.png
- File:Bulgaria Samuil raster.png
- The first has the source cited in the description and links to this map. The second states the source under "Notes," below the Licensing statement. There is a discussion on the talk page of the article regarding the maps. Please keep the discussion there as there are a number of editors involved. @22.214.171.124: Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 22:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
A Dobos torte for you!
|7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
Thanks for the tip-off, Laszlo (and your recent lynx-eyed edits). If you think that 'by' really does require some work on it, let me know. I'm in a rush so I hope I haven't missed anything or misinterpreted. Cheers Nishidani (talk) 18:57, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
- Just checked. See for the source Dan Shapira, which I think I paraphrased pretty closely. I've tired eyes though. Thank goodness, people like you are around to keep me on my toes. Cheers Nishidani (talk) 20:08, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
The change to Joan was also made recently by a mobile IP; I reverted to 1313. Setton gives a date of July 1313; this makes sense because it was tied to one of the elaborate Angevin marital pacts involving the Crusader states in Greece. Choess (talk) 02:52, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Regarding - India
Hello, the term India was coined by British much later even though they came to India in 1600 and the country of India was formed only in 1947. So all the spice trade was made only to the Tamilagam country which was existing at that time. Please do not mislead the history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Givetoalex (talk • contribs) 17:25, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
- Givetoalex Hello, da Gamo is noted for reaching India, not Tamilagam. Your wording makes it appear that his mission was to reach Tamilagam, specifically, and that he is noteworthy for reaching Tamilagam. But that would require reliable sources in support. Perhaps it is worth noting that that was where he landed, but replacing all instances of India is WP:UNDUE. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 17:40, 7 July 2016 (UTC)