User talk:LaundryPizza03

Archives

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 60 days are automatically archived by if there are more than 5.

Disgraceful lie

here! See Prehistoric Britain, Prehistoric Europe etc etc. You've never I think edited the article, so wtf!!! In fact any such move would be pretty certain to be contested, as any experienced user should have known. Please don't abuse processes. Johnbod (talk) 02:34, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnbod: Please appeal to WP:RM, maybe those pages will get moved as well if the move is not overturned. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 02:36, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Small note about G12

G12 doesn't apply to inwiki unattributed copying since you can always repair it (or G6 for a cut-paste move), but the G5 took care of the tagged article regardless. Just a little heads up for the future ^-^ Sennecaster (Chat) 23:38, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Cheers on nominating the Bike Boy draft for MFD. Conspiracy theory crap like that should never be pushed as the object of legitimate scrutiny. TarnishedPath^talk 12:00, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you!

Thank you for properly bundling a nomination of three pages and tagging them properly. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:04, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Polonium dichloride dibromide moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Polonium dichloride dibromide. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Weak, inaccessible, or non-existent sourcing for key details, and generally just apparent remnants of AI slop. doi:10.1039/jr9550003959 might have info, but is it notable even with that?. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DMacks (talk) 15:23, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't create this page; why did you notify me? –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 03:43, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You made some improvements to it while it was in mainspace, so the AFC tools recommended notifying you. The wording is "contributions to" not "page creation". But I agree that "your article" is not a good phrase even if you were the creator--bug filed at User talk:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft#User talk notification wording. DMacks (talk) 05:20, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your technical move request

Hello LaundryPizza03, your recent request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests has been removed because it remained inactive for seventy-two hours after being contested. If you would like to proceed with your original request, please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Controversial.

This notification was delivered by TenshiBot. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=TenshiBot}} on the top of your current page (your user talk page) TenshiBot (talk) 00:00, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reread U7

One of the criteria which qualifies WP:U7 tags is that the work be at least six months old. Find other applicable criteria (like G11) if you can. I'm required to decline U7 tags which don't meet the standard. Thanks for your many positive contributions and the sharp eyes which make such contribs possible. BusterD (talk) 12:37, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for calling my attention to my failure to log deleted G5 CTOPs. This is something I've been quite sloppy on. I'll do better. Looking backwards now. BusterD (talk) 11:01, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good work

I didn't know you could do [1]. Logoshimpo (talk) 03:23, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Some bubble tea for you!

Kinda jealous of your username ngl. Polygnotus (talk) 04:57, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Siberian Soviet Republic

Hello LaundryPizza03. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Siberian Soviet Republic, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: CSD G3 previously declined, please use MfD or just leave it for 6 months. Thank you. CoconutOctopus talk 21:30, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages

Hi, I noticed that you request technical moves at WP:RMTR relatively frequently. It's ok to continue doing that, but since you are a page mover, you can perform most bold moves yourself via WP:ROUNDROBIN. You can use this script for that. Make sure to review WP:RMUM (you can use this to check the move history) and relevant naming conventions if there are any, and perform the needed cleanup (which is retargeting redirects, updating the page name in navboxes and disambiguation pages, and updating the page itself if needed). HurricaneZeta^C 03:27, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I was able to use this just fine. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 08:44, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

TfD

Why are you nominating so many editnotices for deletion at TfD? voorts (talk/contributions) 23:53, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Large-scale cleanup of ones placed at redirects. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 23:54, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But why? voorts (talk/contributions) 23:55, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know of any policy that says redirects can't have editnotices. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:56, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that they are useless because they are barely visible. You are invited to participate at Wikipedia_talk:Templates_for_discussion#Category:Editnotices_whose_targets_are_redirects or the TfD's. At this point, I think I have checked all the editnotices, just in time for Christmas. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 23:58, 24 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have a broader objection so I'm going to raise it at WP:VPP rather than participate in each of the individual TfD discussions. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:02, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Or I suppose you could merge the TfDs. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:07, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello LaundryPizza03, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026.
Happy editing,
Abishe (talk) 09:04, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 09:04, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Anniversary LaundryPizza03 🎉

Hey @LaundryPizza03. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 8 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey and a joyful Merry Christmas and a wonderful, happy 2026 ahead. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 16:59, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: User:0hiostae0099/sandbox

Hello LaundryPizza03. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:0hiostae0099/sandbox, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not blatantly vandalism or a hoax. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:45, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging of Draft:Shimul Borman

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Draft:Shimul Borman. I do not think that Draft:Shimul Borman fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because it isn't patent nonsense, although I admit it's undeveloped.. If you wish, you may try using the simple proposed deletion (PROD) process, or the full articles for deletion (AfD) process, instead, if this was an article, or another process such as MfD or XfD as appropriate. Chess enjoyer (talk) 02:08, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not applicable there, but understood. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 02:10, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you're referring to the part about PROD/AFD, it's baked into the template. Chess enjoyer (talk) 02:13, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LaundryPizza03, I also removed the tag you placed on Draft:The Pillars of game development, as it wasn't a test page. I see that you've made quite a few requests recently, which has created an administrative backlog. Might I ask what prompted this? Chess enjoyer (talk) 02:37, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why I started this, but I found that a surprisingly large fraction of declined drafts in certain subcategories are likely CSD-able. Thus far, most of the G3 and G11 nominations have been successful. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 03:01, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see. So it's just a couple outliers I've caught then. They're all going to be deleted eventually under G13, but I guess there's nothing wrong with finding a reason to delete them a little sooner. Chess enjoyer (talk) 03:30, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Porter Bliquez

Hello LaundryPizza03, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Porter Bliquez, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. asilvering (talk) 03:44, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Priyadarshini Himatsingka

Hello LaundryPizza03, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Priyadarshini Himatsingka, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The draft has already been rejected. There is no need to also summarily delete it. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. asilvering (talk) 03:45, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Tsukurude

Hello LaundryPizza03, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Tsukurude, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. asilvering (talk) 04:03, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Menchaca & Rodríguez

Hello LaundryPizza03, I've already improved Cristian Menchaca's article by adding sources that directly discuss him.

The article has now been revised: the incorrect URL has been fixed, and the references have been replaced with realiable secondary sources that explicitly mention and discuss Menchaca. If you feel that these changes adress the concerns raised, I would kindly ask whether you could remove the proposed deletion template, please.

Regarding Rodríguez, I'll follow up shortly.-- Carigval.97 (talk) 13:24, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 13:25, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kavanaugh stop

Hi. I was going to create a new article on Kavanaugh stop. I was going to begin with the existing material from June_2025_Los_Angeles_protests_against_mass_deportation#Vasquez_Perdomo_v._Noem. I noticed you have a draft of that article ... your draft looks nice, but it looks like you've not yet gotten to adding cites yet. I'll go ahead and create the new article in main space (by copying the text from June_2025_Los_Angeles_protests_against_mass_deportation#Vasquez_Perdomo_v._Noem, and you can then add your material any time you feel is right. I hope that is okay? Normally, there is no rush on these kinds of things, but I've seen "Kavanaugh" stop in the news the past few days, so I think WP needs an article on it fairly soon. Let me know what you think. Noleander (talk) 17:47, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't create the draft originally. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:47, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sorry to bother you. I've created the new article at Kavanaugh stop. Maybe I'll try to merge the draft text into it. On the other hand, it is usually better to start with sources & go from there. Noleander (talk) 17:51, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

270 Park Avenue (2025–present)

Just a heads up, we don't revdel unattributed copying within Wikipedia. RD1 is reserved for blatant violations of the copyright policy. Thanks. The4lines |||| (talk) 19:01, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For all your contributions this year! - RevelationDirect (talk) 20:32, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, LaundryPizza03!

Happy New Year!

LaundryPizza03,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Volten001 ^☎ 18:14, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Volten001 ^☎ 18:14, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey bud

Its the muffin man. Now you know the muffin man. Thanks for sending me a message. TheMuffinMan (jeckyll) (talk) 03:17, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Esporte Clube Limoeiro

Hello LaundryPizza03. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Esporte Clube Limoeiro, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This looks like an editor unfamiliar with wiki syntax attempting to start a draft. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 03:47, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You should consider requesting Template Editor Rights

Hey there. I've noticed your Template edit requests a few times here and there, and figured I should send you a note. You should absolutely request Template Editor rights. It definitely looks like you meet all the requirements, and I think you'd breeze right through the process. While it wouldn't have helped in the case of Template:Editnotice, as it was fully protected, the right would have saved you from a decent number of edit requests in recent times. phuzion (talk) 12:34, 6 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:1347

Hello LaundryPizza03. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:1347, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Alrteady declined speedy - DO NOT ADD back. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 22:36, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:4654

Hello LaundryPizza03. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:4654, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Already previously declined - DO NOT ADD BACK . Thank you. Whpq (talk) 22:37, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Declined speedy deletions

Regarding the above two declines, user:ONUnicorn had already declined the speedy deletion requests. If you think it was a mistake, you can discuss it with the declinging admin but you should not add the speedy deletion tag back. It's edit warring and you really should know better. -- Whpq (talk) 22:40, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've opened an MfD about this dispute. It requires assessment by a language expert. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 22:45, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on The Sims Mobile

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Sims Mobile, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:33, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Radio band AfD bundle

Hello, I see that you, in good faith, named all the articles by wavelength/radio band, but it becomes completely unfeasible for the community to evaluate more than 300 nominations simultaneously. I propose this be discussed directly in the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Radio Stations or or be nominated gradually. Thank you for your attention. Svartner (talk) 08:09, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The reasoning behind the AfD implies that all the articles should be deleted. There have been similar bulk nominations in the past, like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transit of Venus from Uranus. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 08:14, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]