User talk:LeadSongDog

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors![edit]

please help translate this message into the local language
Wiki Project Med Foundation logo.svg The Cure Award
In 2013 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you so much for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date medical information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do!

We are wondering about the educational background of our top medical editors. Would you please complete a quick 5-question survey? (please only fill this out if you received the award)

Thanks again :) --Ocaasi, Doc James and the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation

Royal S. Copeland[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, LeadSongDog. You have new messages at Talk:Royal S. Copeland#"See also" section contents.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

He's baaaack[edit]

@Jytdog: See [1]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for noticing and paraphrasing this copyvio. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Monoclonal_antibody_therapy&type=revision&diff=667710656&oldid=667298294 --Lucas559 (talk) 00:50, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Well, there's a bot that found it, I just paraphrased, but thanks for noticing. LeadSongDog come howl! 05:10, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXI, June 2015[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 26 June[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Re: Bots and talk page[edit]

You made a comment [[2]] to the effect that talk page aren't being watched because they don't have a lot of content. That's simply wrong, because if you watch an article, you automatically watch the talk page. You can't separate the two. This is why they are so annoying, you get tons of articles popping on your watchlist for little to no reason. Updating a parameter is fine. Bypassing a redirect is not, and things like WP:EASTEREGG certainly don't apply because that's about linking to something that looks like X, but links to Y. Where putting {{WPUSA}} on a talk page someone clearly and unambiguously tags the page with WikiProject United States' banner (and not say WikiProject Union of South Africa).

No need to reply to this. I just wanted to point out that talk pages are watched by just as many people as the main articles are. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 05:32, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, Headbomb. Yes I understood that watchers see both talk and article. For articles about most journals, neither are widely watched. Most have had only a few distinct human editors, sometimes only one.[3], [4], [5] (see the entry at Total number of distinct authors) The only editors likely to be annoyed by this are the few actively engaged in WikiProject Academic Journals. LeadSongDog come howl! 06:13, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

A cookie for you![edit]

Choco chip cookie.png Thanks for your interest in the Eranbot project [6]. Feel free to leave comments to improve its interface or efficacy. Lucas559 (talk) 18:16, 5 July 2015 (UTC)