User talk:Lee Vilenski

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Most recent poster here: DYKUpdateBot (talk)

Content requiring reviews!

Cue Sport Alerts All WP:CUE project participants should watchlist this alerts page.
Did you know

Featured article candidates

Good article nominees

All project participants should watchlist this alerts page. Did you know

Articles for deletion

Proposed deletions

Featured article candidates

Good article nominees

Requested moves

My additional content

Service Award
"Experienced Editor, awarded for being a registered editor for at least 1.5 years and making at least 6,000 edits"
This editor is an Experienced Editor and is entitled to display this Service Badge.

Currently, this editor has earned a Experienced Editor (or Grognard Mirabilaire) service award.

To get to the next level, Veteran Editor (or Tutnum), he needs to meet the time requirement.

Progress towards the next level (by time): [ 164.1 days / 182.6 days ]

89.9% completed

   

Your GA nomination of Kristina Tkach[edit]

Passed GA
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


The article Kristina Tkach you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Kristina Tkach for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 19:21, 4 September 2019 (UTC)


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Your GA nomination of David Alcaide[edit]

Passed GA
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article David Alcaide you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:21, 7 September 2019 (UTC)


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Your GA nomination of Oliver Ortmann[edit]

Passed GA
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


The article Oliver Ortmann you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Oliver Ortmann for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:22, 7 September 2019 (UTC)


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

DYK for 2019 Riga Masters[edit]

Updated DYK query.svgOn 7 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2019 Riga Masters, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2019 Riga Masters. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2019 Riga Masters), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 14:02, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Ding Junhui[edit]

Hey, as a followup to this discussion, the article Ding Junhui has been copy edited by the GOCE. There is some feedback I've gotten on my talk page, which I will resolve when I get free time. I've nominated it for GA, so if you could review it (given your expertise in snooker), that would be great. Bobbychan193 (talk) 02:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

I have added it to my to-do list. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 12:47, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Sounds good, thanks. Take your time too. Bobbychan193 (talk) 18:31, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Montenegrin language[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Montenegrin language. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Veronika Ivanovskaia[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Veronika Ivanovskaia at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:53, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 23:33, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

request for help with DYK[edit]

can you please help me with my DYK nomination? it is under September 8th. thanks! --Sm8900 (talk) 01:09, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

never mind, it has been fixed. --Sm8900 (talk) 01:41, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Sm8900 is this the Template:Did you know nominations/Sulfur-breathing organisms nom? It is both a stub and too short (minimum is 1,500 bytes) to be nominated. It's currently at under 500, so would need to be expanded 3x in the next eight days to be valid. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 13:28, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2019 WPA World Ten-ball Championship[edit]

Passed GA
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


The article 2019 WPA World Ten-ball Championship you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:2019 WPA World Ten-ball Championship for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:42, 9 September 2019 (UTC)


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Your GA nomination of David Alcaide[edit]

Passed GA
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


The article David Alcaide you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:David Alcaide for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:02, 9 September 2019 (UTC)


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Karuka[edit]

You mentioned on Discord: "Looking at Karuka, it's got a really weak lead summary, which is an instant issue for me." Could you explain further? Leads need a summary? --Nessie (talk) 15:48, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Leads are a summary. They shouldn't need citations, as they are a summary of the information in the rest of the article. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 16:18, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2016 World Snooker Championship[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2016 World Snooker Championship you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrLinkinPark333 -- MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:41, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 11[edit]

Done
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1985 World Snooker Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Skit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 11 September 2019 (UTC)


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

DYK for Veronika Ivanovskaia[edit]

Updated DYK query.svgOn 11 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Veronika Ivanovskaia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when learning to play pool, Veronika Ivanovskaia stood on a crate of Coca-Cola? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Veronika Ivanovskaia. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Veronika Ivanovskaia), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 12:02, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marcus Chamat[edit]

Passed GA
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Marcus Chamat you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 15:00, 11 September 2019 (UTC)


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019[edit]

Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg

Hello Lee Vilenski,

Backlog

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Coordinator

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.

This month's refresher course

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.

Paid editing

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion
  • Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
  • Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.
Not English
  • A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.
Tools

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Marcus Chamat[edit]

Passed GA
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


The article Marcus Chamat you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Marcus Chamat for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:01, 12 September 2019 (UTC)


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Your GA nomination of Marcus Chamat[edit]

Passed GA
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


The article Marcus Chamat you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Marcus Chamat for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 19:01, 12 September 2019 (UTC)


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Flagicon[edit]

Hi, re your revert on 2019 Six-red World Championship, can you point out to me where in MOS:FLAG it states flagathlete should be used instead of flagicon? Apologies, I can't seem to find it and wasn't aware there had been a change. Andygray110 (talk) 20:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi Andygray110! I hope you are well. It has been a big issue recently, it's an issue with both the MOS:FLAG and WP:ACCESS. It has been pointed out in a few discussions that the first viewing of a flag needs more than just a visual representation (thus flagathlete).
the best conversation to read would be at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2018 World Snooker Championship/archive1 which failed due to these flag issues. Elsewhere, WT:SNOOKER has had some commentary of ghe situation. For much the same reason, we no longer have flags for century breaks, as they are purely decorative, and break MOS:FLAG. I hope thats enough info! happy wiki'ing Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 21:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Having read that article I note that it doesn't mention any consensus for flagathlete, nor that the use of flagathlete is explicitly mentioned in MOS:FLAG, hence my surprise at the summary reason for the revert. However I do see in the discussion the issue with flagicon, and the solution you came up with seems a good one. The issue now is that the infoboxes of the new tournaments differ markedly from past tournaments (as they are still using the flagicon template). Is it on your radar to adjust the old tournaments? I can try and lend a hand if so. Andygray110 (talk) 21:15, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Andygray110 It is on my to-do list; but I am super deep into content creation for the Wikicup final round. Realistically, I need to update the MOS for this, but I suspect I'd need a new consensus and wording to do so, and I simply do not have the time to do it.
if there is a better way to do this, I am all ears, however, we should follow our featured content and MOS. If you would be willing to do some updating for this, I would be greatful. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 21:21, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Sounds good, if I have the time I'll give it a go. Good luck in the cup! Andygray110 (talk) 21:23, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Who are you?[edit]

To think that you can decide what the content of my talk page is supposed to be? You also want to come and decide which furniture I should have at my home? --Sb008 (talk) 07:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Well, clearly the conversation you was having was regarding information that had already had a consensus at FOOTY, so I would have thought you would have wanted to follow this and gain a new consensus. If you weren't looking to do this, the conversation is moot. I'll leave it alone, as it's clear you do not want to gain any consensus on this. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 07:48, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
  1. You can copy things from my talk page, you can link to items on my talk page, but you do not delete things from my talk page unless it's one of you own contribution or you consulted me on the matter. How would you like it if I would come and organize your talk page to my liking?
  2. You claim there's a consensus, in other words there is a standard for league pages. Does this mean you're refering to this? If so, let's have at the first sentence on the page "This page is part of the WikiProject on Football and is a proposal for the general style and contents of an article on a league season.". Proposal indicates it has no real status. Furthermore, even if it would be a standard, let's look at the most relevant statement in the stats section "The inclusion of this section is not decided yet". That line actually says there's no consensus on stats data. Frankly I would define the whole page as immature and incomplete.
  3. Or is this supposed to be the consensus? A quick exchange of unmotived opinions by a select few within a time period of less than 48 hours. You yourself call it WP:FANCRUFT. From my earlier posts you can see that 3 major sites consider this kind of data relevant enough to include in the standings table. To get an idea of how well my team will do in their next match, I'm more interested on how the oppononent is ranked and how well they performed in the last few matches, than who is their kit manufacturer. If according the proposal for the general style and contents of an article on a league season, the kit manufacturar is cnsidered important relevant imformation which is of interest not only to a small population of enthusiastic fans, but to the general public, there isn't much left which possibly could qualify as WP:FANCRUFT. Maybe you should consider listing the tattoo artist of players as well.
  4. As far as I'm consider the module Module:Sports rbr table represents far more a standard than an immature proposal or unmotived opinions of a select few. In general the purpose of templates and modules is to simplify common practices.
  5. You can join HawkAussie in the mission to get the module Module:Sports rbr table removed. Information "we" don't want on pages, should surely not be facilitated by modules to do so in an easy way.
--Sb008 (talk) 09:54, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
I'm sorry if I upset you - the information has been returned to your talk page by your own undo, and I won't touch your page again. The additions for general round-by-round table for a league this size, is in my opinion, a ridiculous addition of stat-cruft. I think that the information should be discussed at FOOTY, as this is where we would get the best input, and where the conversation should be; and it would be wise to add your own opinions as above there. However, if you would like to raise these points at that destination, I would be obliged, as my talk page is not a suitable venue for this. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 10:08, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
If you had put the part "The additions for general ....... at that destination" on my talk page with the addition "so I'll copy this discussion to the FOOTY page, it had been perfectly fine with. I don't mind the discussion being moved there, I mind you deleting stuff on my talk page. And on that kind of behavior I address you on your talk page and not on FOOTY. Furthermore, if you clain in your response there's an existing consensus, I dispute that claim over here. I only came here to address you on your behavior regarding my talk page, not to discuss the results table. You connected the two issues by using a consensus on that issue as defence for your behavior. --Sb008 (talk) 10:38, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2019 Riga Masters[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2019 Riga Masters you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:42, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2016 World Snooker Championship[edit]

The article 2016 World Snooker Championship you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2016 World Snooker Championship for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrLinkinPark333 -- MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:21, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of 2017 World Women's Snooker Championship[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of 2017 World Women's Snooker Championship at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:09, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:TERF[edit]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:TERF. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Daryl Peach[edit]

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Daryl Peach has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:35, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

DYK for 2017 World Women's Snooker Championship[edit]

Updated DYK query.svgOn 17 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2017 World Women's Snooker Championship, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the final of the 2017 World Women's Snooker Championship was the longest ever recorded best-of-11-frames match, lasting over eight hours of playing time? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2017 World Women's Snooker Championship. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2017 World Women's Snooker Championship), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:02, 17 September 2019 (UTC)