|On 24 January 2014, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Catherine Samba-Panza, which you recently nominated and substantially updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Memorial Gymnasium (Virginia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University Hall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Egyptian Revolution of 2013
Partisan sources? → The New York Times FrontPage Mag Jadaliyya ChicagoNow DW The Guardian Der Spiegel Voice of America Financial Times Time World Al Monitor openDemocracy
Those "partisan sources" call this a revolution, while other sources call the coup d'état a coup d'état. You abandoned the discussion in Talk:2013 Egyptian coup d'état, but i remember you saying that it is "logically impossible" to have a revolution and a coup at the same time. Carnation Revolution, Saur Revolution, Revolución Libertadora, Brazilian Revolution of 1930, Young Turk Revolution and Egyptian Revolution of 1952 were all military coups.
Care to point out/discuss an example of POV in the article? I'll be glad to remove or change it but you can't just say there is a neutrality issue without starting a discussion about it. And i'm trying to improve the article so i would be grateful if you showed me an instance. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 21:08, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- You can also help writing the "Coup d'état and aftermath" section of the article if you're interested. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 23:06, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- It appears Lihaas that you like to neglect discussions and you also fail to specify where is this POV, but you seem to think it's easy to tag an article and leave the editors wondering what could possibly be wrong. If you don't participate in the discussion i will remove this tag because it appears you're the one who's POVishly and flagrantly opposing the word "revolution" without any good reason and with poor arguments. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 12:44, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
My talk page
For some bizarre reason, I have been having huge trouble loading wikipedia after dinner for the last few days, and because of that haven't been checking talk. I saw your comment, but at this point I don't remember what it refers to. Please don't think I was being intentionally rude--whatever it was we were disagreeing on I would have explained better if I could. μηδείς (talk) 21:38, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Is it possible to merge this page with the existing Indian general election, 2014#Opinion polls section. I still don't think we should unnecessarily increase the number of pages, while we are discussing the same thing over different pages. Need some more opinion. Thanks. Logical1004 (talk) 06:51, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- User:25 Cents FC User:Lihaas If we are agree on this, can you give your opinion on the page Talk:Opinion polling for the Indian general election, 2014#Necessity, where I have raised the same question there. Need more opinions, then we can proceed with the merge, if decided. And like User:25 Cents FC said, we can make the page semi-protected or protected as this event is a future related important event, and to ensure the neutrality, its necessary. Indian general election, 2014 is already a semi-protected page. Logical1004 (talk) 16:51, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Central African Republic conflict under the Djotodia administration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jorge Castaneda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.