This user created and primarily contributed to The Conservatism Portal become a featured portal.
This editor created and nominated Timeline of modern American conservatism, the best list in all of Wikipedia, for Featured List. The FLC was sabotaged on ideological grounds.
This user uploaded and was responsible for Commercial-LBJ1964ElectionAdDaisyGirl.ogv become a featured picture.
This editor helped Ronald Reagan filmography become a featured list but it was delisted.
This user uploaded File:First colored senator and reps.jpg become a featured picture.
This user significantly contributed to "Southern Adventist University" become a good article.
This user contributed to "Knights of Columbus" become a good article.
This user significantly contributed to "First Motion Picture Unit" become a good article.
This user helped get "Louis Cottrell, Jr." listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "Franklin Canyon Park" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "Chicken Hawk: Men Who Love Boys" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "Star Trek Concordance" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "Instinto Asesino" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "CatholicVote.org" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "Bill Andriette" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "Mount Carmel High School (Los Angeles)" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "Homosexuals Anonymous" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "ProtectMarriage.com" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "October Baby" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "Cristiada (film)" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "First Motion Picture Unit" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "Dan Oates" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "Speeches and debates of Ronald Reagan" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "2016: Obama's America" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "What a Beautiful Name" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "Paul, Apostle of Christ" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "Pulpit Freedom Sunday" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "Charles LiMandri" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "List of court cases involving Alliance Defending Freedom" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "Both Lives Matter" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "Sister Jean" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This user helped get "Destiny Herndon-De La Rosa" listed at Did You Know on the main page.
This editor helped rescue Nancy Heche
This editor helped rescue Parental Rights Amendment to the United States Constitution
This editor helped rescue Timeline of conservatism
This editor helped rescue Begin (computer game)

User talk:Lionelt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Thank you[edit]

Thank you for the barnstar. AgeOfPlantagenet (talk) 10:12, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Sister Jean[edit]

Updated DYK query.svgOn 24 May 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sister Jean, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a bobblehead of Sister Jean, the chaplain for the Loyola Ramblers men's basketball team, sold for more than $300 on eBay? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sister Jean. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sister Jean), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:52, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Joice Hasselmann[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Joice Hasselmann at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:02, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Lionelt, please return to this nomination as soon as possible; there are issues that you need to address. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:49, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:52, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I promoted the hook, and then realized it was over 200 characters. I piped the link. If you want to do it another way, please let me know. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 23:10, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Ichthus June 2018[edit]

Ichthus dark yellow.png

ICHTHUS

June 2018

Project news
By Lionelt

Here are discussions relevant to the Project:

The following articles need reviewers for GA-class: Type of Constans nom. by Gog the Mild, Tian Feng (magazine) nom. by Finnusertop. Your assistance is greatly appreciated.

Stay up-to-date on the latest happenings at the Project Watch


Did You Know
Nominated by Gonzonoir

... that in 1636, Phineas Hodson, Chancellor of York Minster, lost his 38-year-old wife Jane during the birth of the couple's 24th child?

Featured article
Nominated by Cliftonian

The Kidnapping of Edgardo Mortara, painting by Moritz Daniel Oppenheim, 1862. This depiction departs significantly from the historical record of how Mortara was taken—no clergy were present, for example.
The Kidnapping of Edgardo Mortara

The Mortara case was a controversy precipitated by the Papal States' seizure of Edgardo Mortara, a six-year-old Jewish child, from his family in Bologna, Italy, in 1858. The city's inquisitor, Father Pier Feletti, heard from a servant that she had administered emergency baptism to the boy when he fell sick as an infant, and the Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Roman and Universal Inquisition held that this made the child irrevocably a Catholic. Because the Papal States had forbidden the raising of Christians by members of other faiths, it was ordered that he be taken from his family and brought up by the Church. After visits from the child's father, international protests mounted, but Pope Pius IX would not be moved. The boy grew up as a Catholic with the Pope as a substitute father, trained for the priesthood in Rome until 1870, and was ordained in France three years later. In 1870 the Kingdom of Italy captured Rome during the unification of Italy, ending the pontifical state; opposition across Italy, Europe and the United States over Mortara's treatment may have contributed to its downfall. (Full article...)


Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity • Get answers to questions about Christianity here
Discuss any of the above stories here • For submissions contact the Newsroom • Unsubscribe here
Delivered: 11:58, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Re: 3RR block[edit]

I just came across the editor with 4 reverts on the article, left him a note, and blocked him for 24 hours per WP:3RR. I'm sorry if you feel I reverted to the WP:WRONGVERSION. I'm sure there will be a discussion on the talk page as to which version is the right version going forward. Andrevan@ 01:08, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

3RR is a bright-line rule. The user's only edits are violating 3RR. The user may request unblock if they wish. Andrevan@ 01:18, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
I didn't block him under the 1RR or special edit warring discretionary sanctions, just the regular 3RR. Andrevan@ 01:28, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
  • The only way you get to 4 reverts is by counting 2 consecutive edits as separate reverts. But they're not separate, they count as a single revert which you'd know if you had any business being an administrator. Even worse, the article is under 1RR. 1RR is the bright line; so you managed the right outcome only by being wrong twice! Realistically you have two options - resign or be forced out. The former saves our time and your dignity. 192.40.95.30 (talk) 01:37, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

DYK for National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra[edit]

Updated DYK query.svgOn 10 June 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that at oral argument in NIFLA v. Becerra, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan questioned whether a California law was "gerrymandered" in order to discriminate against crisis pregnancy centers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 11:12, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Mass message sender granted[edit]

Wikipedia mass messenger.svg

Hello. Your account has been granted the "massmessage-sender" user right, allowing you to send messages to multiple users at once. A few important things to note:

  • Messages should only be sent to groups of users who are likely to be interested in the topic.
  • For regular mailings such as those for WikiProjects, localized events, or newsletters, users should be informed of how they can unsubscribe from future mailings.
  • The mass messaging tool should never be used for canvassing with the intention of influencing the outcome of discussions.

For more information, refer to the guidance for use. If you do not want mass message sender rights anymore, just let me or any other administrator know and we will remove it. Thank you and happy editing! — xaosflux Talk 13:26, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Some special notes[edit]

Hi Lionelt, just wanted to give you a few special notes and tips on this.

  • You should create a "test" mailing list with just yourself and maybe 1 other person on it, and use it to test your mailings.
    After sending a mailing, check if any layout on the talk page has been broken, especially when replying to that section, or creating another section. (This could be caused by bad or mismatched html tags for example).
  • If you want to help at WT:MMS and send mailings for others, that is great - but take care that anything you send on their behalf is appropriate.
    Certainly check the page and even do a test to yourself if you are not sure.
    Check their recipient list, especially checking how was it created? (E.g. anything opted in to is generally safe, a load of project participants that signed up are usually as well -- a list that was only edited by the requester, and its not clear where the recipients came from- this is suspect).
    Consider adding a html comment at the end of the message, like <!-- Message requested by User:Username at WT:MMS-->
  • Be sure there is a timestamp in the message, normally near the bottom - these are used by archiving bots.

Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 13:32, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

The Right Stuff June 2018[edit]

The Right Stuff
June 2018
FROM THE EDITOR
The Right Stuff Returns

By Lionelt

Fellow members, I'm pleased to announce the return of the newsletter of WikiProject Conservatism. And considering the recent downsizing at The Signpost the timing could not be better. The Right Stuff will help keep you apprised of what's happening in conservatism at Wikipedia and in the world. The Right Stuff welcomes submissions including position pieces, instructional articles, or short essays addressing important conservatism-related issues. Post submissions here.

Add the Project Discussion page to your watchlist for the latest updates at WikiProject Conservatism Watch (Discuss this story)

ARBITRATION REPORT
Russian Agents Editing at American Politics?

By Lionelt

After a series of unfortunate events largely self-created, bureaucrat and admin Andrevan was the subject of an Arbitration case for conduct unbecoming. Prior to the case getting underway Andrevan resigned as bureaucrat and admin. A widely discussed incident was when he suggested that some editors he described as "pro-Trump" were paid Russian agents. This resulted in a number of editors from varied quarters denouncing the allegations and voicing support for veteran editors including Winkelvi and the notorious MONGO.

Editors who faced Enforcement action include SPECIFICO (no action), Factchecker atyourservice (three month topic ban ARBAPDS), Netoholic (no action) and Anythingyouwant (indef topic ban ARBAPDS). (Discuss this story)
IN THE MEDIA
Breitbart Versus Wikipedia

By Lionelt

Breitbart News, in response to Facebook's decision to use Wikipedia as a source to fight fake news, has declared war on our beloved pedia. The article in Haaretz describes the Facebook arrangement as Wikipedia's "greatest test in years" as well as a "massive threat" to the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Breitbart's targeting of Wikipedia has resulted in an "epic battle" with respect to editing at the Breitbart article. The article has also recently experienced a dramatic increase in traffic with 50,000 visitors according to Haaretz. There is no love lost between Breitbart and Wikipedia where editors at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard have criticized the news websites unreliability and have compared it to The Daily Mail. (Discuss this story)

DISCUSSION REPORT
Liberty and Trump and Avi, Oh my!

By Lionelt

Liberty is one of the largest Christian universities in the world and the largest private non-profit university in the United States. Described as a "bastion of the Christian right" in American politics, the university plays a prominent role in Republican politics. President Donald J. Trump gave his first college commencement speech as sitting president at Liberty University.
President Donald Trump Speaks at Liberty University Commencement Ceremony
There are several open discussions at the Project:
Recently closed discussions include Anti-abortion movements which was not renamed, and an RFC at Trump–Russia dossier. (Discuss this story)

Delivered: 11:12, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Good job with this!!!!! Glad to have it back. --Chlorineer (talk) 13:47, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
This is great! Kudos! CsikosLo (talk) 14:49, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Sandbox[edit]

Hi Lionelt, I published the article in my sandbox. Thanks!--Biografix (talk) 14:59, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Your revert[edit]

Hi, Could you explain why you reverted my edit? You did not leave an edit summary. –dlthewave 12:41, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Destiny Herndon-De La Rosa[edit]

Updated DYK query.svgOn 17 June 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Destiny Herndon-De La Rosa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Destiny Herndon-De La Rosa's feminist group New Wave Feminists was removed as a partner of the 2017 Women's March after organizers discovered the group was pro-life? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Destiny Herndon-De La Rosa. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Destiny Herndon-De La Rosa), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

25 DYK nominations medal[edit]

Dyk25N.svg The 25 DYK Nomination Medal
It took a while, but you finally got there. Well done Lionelt on completing 25 DYKs! Gatoclass (talk) 10:21, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Ruddock[edit]

It seems pretty absurd as an Australian to rank a not-particularly-influential, if long-serving Australian Cabinet minister as "high importance" in the scheme of international conservative politics on the basis that they were Father of the House (a little-known courtesy title) - but if you want to do strange things, I'm not going to stop you. The Drover's Wife (talk) 11:45, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions FAQ[edit]

Thanks for the link! It's far far more user friendly than the default alert. I've made a couple of changes - mostly minor grammars tweak which I hope you won't object to, plus added a link to explain what 1RR is as I had to look up what that meant. 人族 (talk) 04:55, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Correcting, per request[edit]

[1] - no. I voluntarily agreed not to edit the article Donald Trump for one week. This does not apply to the talk page, nor does it apply to the Presidency of Donald Trump article.Volunteer Marek (talk) 08:51, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Inspector General Report on FBI and DOJ's Actions in the 2016 Election[edit]

Hello. I'm currently reviewing this nomination, and partly due to concerns raised by FallingGravity, I've struck both of the hooks. As you were involved in the nomination, your feedback and immediate response is appreciated. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:48, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

List of American Conservatives and 1776[edit]

Would you care to join this discussion? Some seem to believe that conservatism began in 1776 and want more of the Founding Fathers in the article. They oppose the 1932 cutoff. --GHcool (talk) 22:51, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Ichthus: July 2018[edit]

Ichthus dark yellow.png

ICHTHUS

July 2018

The Top 7 report
By Lionelt

The big news was the marriage of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. The Top 7 most popular articles in WikiProject Christianity were:

    1. Elizabeth I of England – legendary monarch who ushered in the Elizabethan Era over the dead body of her half-sister (#5)
    2. Henry VIII of England – on his deathbed the last words of the king who founded the English Reformation were "Monks! Monks! Monks!"
    3. Martin Luther King Jr. – can't wait to see the new US$5 bill featuring the "I Have a Dream" speech
    4. Seven deadly sins – surprisingly "original research" is not one of the Seven deadly sins
    5. Mary, Queen of Scots – arrested for Reigning While Catholic (RWC)
    6. Michael Curry (bishop) – our article says that he upstaged Meghan at her wedding. Did you see her wedding pictures? All I can say is {{dubious}}
    7. Robert F. Kennedy – when informed that missiles were being installed in Cuba he famously quipped, "Can they hit Oxford, Mississippi?"


Did you know
Nominated by The C of E

... that the little-known 1758 Methodist hymn "Sun of Unclouded Righteousness" asks God to send the doctrine of the "Unitarian fiend ... back to hell", referring to both Islam and Unitarianism?

Our newest Featured list
Nominated by Freikorp

The Last Judgment by painter Hans Memling.
The Last Judgment by painter Hans Memling.

List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events. Predictions of apocalyptic events that would result in the extinction of humanity, a collapse of civilization, or the destruction of the planet have been made since at least the beginning of the Christian Era. Most predictions are related to Abrahamic religions, often standing for or similar to the eschatological events described in their scriptures. Christian predictions typically refer to events like the Rapture, Great Tribulation, Last Judgment, and the Second Coming of Christ.

Polls conducted in 2012 across 20 countries found over 14% of people believe the world will end in their lifetime, with percentages raging from 6% of people in France to 22% in the US and Turkey. In the UK in 2015, the general public believed the likeliest cause would be nuclear war, while experts thought it would be artificial intelligence. Between one and three percent of people from both countries thought the apocalypse would be caused by zombies or alien invasion. (more...)


Help wanted

We're looking for writers to contribute to Ichthus. Do you have a project that you'd like to highlight? An issue that you'd like to bring to light? Post your inquiries or submission here.


Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity • Get answers to questions about Christianity here
Discuss any of the above stories here • For submissions contact the Newsroom • Unsubscribe here
Delivered: 06:39, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

The Right Stuff: July 2018[edit]

The Right Stuff
July 2018
DISCUSSION REPORT
WikiProject Conservatism Comes Under Fire

By Lionelt

WikiProject Conservatism was a topic of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard/Incident (AN/I). Objective3000 started a thread where he expressed concern regarding the number of RFC notices posted on the Discussion page suggesting that such notices "could result in swaying consensus by selective notification." Several editors participated in the relatively abbreviated six hour discussion. The assertion that the project is a "club for conservatives" was countered by editors listing examples of users who "profess no political persuasion." It was also noted that notification of WikiProjects regarding ongoing discussions is explicitly permitted by the WP:Canvassing guideline.

At one point the discussion segued to feedback about The Right Stuff. Member SPECIFICO wrote: "One thing I enjoy about the Conservatism Project is the handy newsletter that members receive on our talk pages." Atsme praised the newsletter as "first-class entertainment...BIGLY...first-class...nothing even comes close...it's amazing." Some good-natured sarcasm was offered with Objective3000 observing, "Well, they got the color right" and MrX's followup, "Wow. Yellow is the new red."

Admin Oshwah closed the thread with the result "definitely not an issue for ANI" and directing editors to the project Discussion page for any further discussion. Editor's note: originally the design and color of The Right Stuff was chosen to mimic an old, paper newspaper.

Add the Project Discussion page to your watchlist for the "latest RFCs" at WikiProject Conservatism Watch (Discuss this story)

ARTICLES REPORT
Margaret Thatcher Makes History Again

By Lionelt

Margaret Thatcher is the first article promoted at the new WikiProject Conservatism A-Class review. Congratulations to Neveselbert. A-Class is a quality rating which is ranked higher than GA (Good article) but the criteria are not as rigorous as FA (Featured article). WikiProject Conservatism is one of only two WikiProjects offering A-Class review, the other being WikiProject Military History. Nominate your article here. (Discuss this story)
RECENT RESEARCH
Research About AN/I

By Lionelt

Reprinted in part from the April 26, 2018 issue of The Signpost; written by Zarasophos

Out of over one hundred questioned editors, only twenty-seven (27%) are happy with the way reports of conflicts between editors are handled on the Administrators' Incident Noticeboard (AN/I), according to a recent survey . The survey also found that dissatisfaction has varied reasons including "defensive cliques" and biased administrators as well as fear of a "boomerang effect" due to a lacking rule for scope on AN/I reports. The survey also included an analysis of available quantitative data about AN/I. Some notable takeaways:

  • 53% avoided making a report due to fearing it would not be handled appropriately
  • "Otherwise 'popular' users often avoid heavy sanctions for issues that would get new editors banned."
  • "Discussions need to be clerked to keep them from raising more problems than they solve."

In the wake of Zarasophos' article editors discussed the AN/I survey at The Signpost and also at AN/I. Ironically a portion of the AN/I thread was hatted due to "off-topic sniping." To follow-up the problems identified by the research project the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-Harassment Tools team and Support and Safety team initiated a discussion. You can express your thoughts and ideas here.

(Discuss this story)

Delivered: 09:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Why is MediaWiki message delivery delivering "The Right Stuff" to the sandbox?[edit]

Hi, Lionel. See [2]. That can't be right. Some misclick? I tried the message delivery talkpage, but it asked me to take it to you. Bishonen | talk 10:48, 9 July 2018 (UTC).

That was a test. Sometimes I do a test run before the live mailing. This time around the pie chart wasn't previewing correctly in the mass message preview screen so I tested it. – Lionel(talk) 10:56, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Joice Hasselmann[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Joice Hasselmann at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:38, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

The Right Stuff[edit]

Hi,

I really appreciate what you do with the newsletter. Just a suggestion though, unfortunately "The Right Stuff" is also the name of The Right Stuff (blog), a white supremacist blog, so it might be wise to perhaps considering changing the name as some people may try to draw connections.


Really unfortunate that this kind of stuff happens.


Marquis de Faux (talk) 22:56, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your support. Yeah, I recently became aware of the blog. Our The Right Stuff newsletter was founded before the white supremacist blog. As to changing the name, I'm not inclined to capitulate to white supremacists particularly since I'm Black. I'm of the opinion that the phrase "the right stuff" should be "reclaimed" (as they say in multicultural studies). – Lionel(talk) 01:58, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Ironically, I came here with the same comment, but a thread already exists :-). I think it would be difficult to reclaim the name, given the present-day concerns that the GOP can be perceived as too welcoming to the fringe element. Just today I saw this article: Self-described Nazis and white supremacists are running as Republicans across the country. The GOP is terrified..
I respect your decision to keep the name, but I always think of blog when I see the newsletter. I was thinking of subscribing, but can't bring myself to. Just some reader feedback. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:17, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

WikiConference North America 2018[edit]

We should propose a panel about being a minority editing community and difficulty experiences in creating neutral content.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:59, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Given the recent discussion at ANI perhaps we roundtable panel at the WikiConference would be good to have. Perhaps it should be titled "#RESIST : An editors round table"
The primary topic of editing relating to current events in the United States since November 2016, with sub-topic discussions on notability of new subjects/articles from reliable sources with a bias against the present federal government administration, and the reaction of the editing community to individual editors seeking to improve content which is not left of center, and Neutrality in editing within the WP:ARBAPDS sphere of articles.
@Lionelt: Thoughts?--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 03:30, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Battle For America[edit]

Notice

The article Battle For America has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is literally just a listing for a propaganda film.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Calton | Talk 05:25, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Hope and the Change[edit]

Notice

The article The Hope and the Change has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is literally just a listing for a propaganda film.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Calton | Talk 05:27, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Torchbearer (documentary)[edit]

Notice

The article Torchbearer (documentary) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This just a listing for a propaganda film, one which its creator is using to promote it https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wesley_Craig&diff=prev&oldid=850058571

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Calton | Talk 05:28, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Battle For America for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle For America is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle For America until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - MrX 🖋 10:34, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Torchbearer (documentary) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Torchbearer (documentary) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torchbearer (documentary) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Calton | Talk 11:18, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of The Hope and the Change for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Hope and the Change is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hope and the Change until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk • ✍️ Contributions) Please ping me if you had replied 11:34, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Free Speech Fairness Act for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Free Speech Fairness Act is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free Speech Fairness Act until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave 16:27, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Scare quotes[edit]

There's an issue at Political activity of the Knights of Columbus and Knights of Columbus regarding the use of scare quotes around culture of life. Since you weighed in before on the topic, I thought you might be so kind as to do so again. We got two third opinions, but one user is ignoring the consensus. --BrianCUA (talk) 02:54, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

ANI[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Black Kite (talk) 13:15, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Just for ease of finding it, the thread is Possible political POV pushing onto the Main Page using DYK. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 17:34, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

knights of columbus[edit]

Hello. I wanted to give you a heads up that I mentioned you in a dispute on the edit warring notice board. --BrianCUA (talk) 14:22, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Steve King[edit]

I notice that someone else slightly changed your comment on the Steve King talk page, here. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 21:17, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

BAGBot: Your bot request LioneltBot 2[edit]

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/LioneltBot 2 as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT 03:56, 27 August 2018 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place {{bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded}} anywhere on this page.

User:Snooganssnoogans has a history of personal attacks[edit]

I read your section on "Snooganssnoogans"'s talk page. Snooganssnoogans has also used similar language against other WP users. For example, here. 74.109.177.105 (talk) 23:09, 2 September 2018 (UTC)