User talk:LittleWink

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This user prefers to be notified by Notifications. Please use {{ping}} or {{reply to}} when you reply to this user. No talkback messages are needed.

New Page Reviewing[edit]

Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg
Hello, LittleWink.

As one of Wikipedia's most experienced Wikipedia editors,
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 08:41, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Exponential map[edit]

Sorry about not giving a reason for reverting the change to a SIA. The page should be a disambig page since the concepts, exponential map in Riemann geometry and exponential map in Lie theory are distinct concepts. That they both happen to belong to the same field doesn't make the page a SIA. Two personals of the same nationality still need to be disambiguated. -- Taku (talk) 23:27, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Articles for Creation Reviewing[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
Hello, LittleWink.
AfC submissions
Random submission
2+ months
3767 pending submissions
Purge to update

I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged.
Would you please consider becoming an Articles for Creation reviewer? Articles for Creation reviewers help new users learn the ropes of creating their first articles, and identify whether topics are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Reviewing drafts doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia inclusion policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After requesting to be added to the project, reviewing is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the reviewing instructions before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 02:31, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

I would like your input in this discussion[edit]

Hi,

I would appreciate it if you could give your input regarding https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_naval_ship_classes_in_service#Split_this_article_into_multiple_articles Thanks in advance Dragnadh (talk) 21:26, 1 January 2018 (UTC)