User talk:Lmatt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

C Sharp (programming language): Not supplying edit summary[edit]

Hello, Lmatt

I see that you have deleted contents from C Sharp (programming language) without supplying an edit summary. Given what I read in the "versions" section the article, your removal seemed highly controversial and so I revert it. But perhaps you would like to explain what you were thinking, in case you'd like to follow up B.R.D. (No pressure though.)

Regards,
Fleet Command (talk) 01:52, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Spoilers in episode lists?[edit]

Hi, I see you've been involved in Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Television. I have begun a discussion on spoilers in episode lists and would appreciate your input. -- ke4roh (talk) 02:25, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

(Move log); 17:20 . . Lmatt (talk | contribs) moved page Bristol Parkway railway station to Bristol Parkway over redirect ‎(more concise)[edit]

This move is bad. ALL railway stations articles for the UK follow a naming convention which (put simply) says "use ... railway station if it's a railway station and that's all, use ... station if more than 1 mode of transport (eg trams, LU, etc). Furthermore, the Bristol Parkway is the M32 motorway. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:57, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Could you provide me a link to the naming convention? I'm having trouble finding it myself. Lmatt (talk) 17:11, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Naming conventions (UK stations). --Redrose64 (talk) 17:34, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Another reason is for a while there were signs for the Avon Ringroad saying the Bristol Parkway, this is another reason for the naming. Mark999 (talk) 17:39, 20 July 2012 (UTC) Please in future do more research and view similar articles before making "major" edits and moves.

Buses[edit]

Oi! I have changed the lead of the article to explain what you were trying to get across, so there is really no need to change the rest of the article. It does not meet the format used by all other articles and leads to excess confusion, as you have already pointed out people do not associate Flights Hallmark with anything in Bristol. And to be fair this is only the legal position, if we were to use the legal name of every company no one would have any idea what was what. Mark999 (talk) 17:23, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Template: Psychology subscript text?[edit]

Your edit to Template:Psychology puts in a leading subscript text for some reason. See Martin Seligman for an example (or the source) RDBrown (talk) 07:01, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

I added that subscript text accidentally, probably by a misplaced click in the edit window. Redrose64 has now removed it. Lmatt (talk) 16:20, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Manual of Style (punctuation) listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Manual of Style (punctuation). Since you had some involvement with the Manual of Style (punctuation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Dicklyon (talk) 05:58, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

WP:STABLE listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:STABLE. Since you had some involvement with the WP:STABLE redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). John Vandenberg (chat) 05:30, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Lmatt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Light bulbs listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Light bulbs. Since you had some involvement with the Light bulbs redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 19:44, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Lmatt. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed[edit]

Hello Lmatt! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MusikBot II talk 20:24, 9 January 2018 (UTC)