User talk:Locaterobin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Locaterobin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Peepal Farm, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms our use and policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! DBigXray 22:13, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion nomination of The Glossary[edit]

Hello Locaterobin,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Glossary for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Josu4u (talk) 10:10, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dhanotu has been accepted[edit]

Dhanotu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:09, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Chambi Khad) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Chambi Khad, Locaterobin!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank for creating this. Something seems to have gone wrong with your reference, can you please take a look?

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 13:45, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Robin Singh (entrepreneur) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:43, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suffering footprint[edit]

The article just isn't ready for the encyclopedia. It needs references and some suggestion of notability. Deb (talk) 13:17, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you.Deb (talk) 13:27, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robin Singh (activist) (October 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 13:44, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Locaterobin, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 13:44, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vegan Friendly requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. David.moreno72 14:12, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Robin Singh (activist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Recreation of article which is deleted earlier.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NANExcella (talk) 10:56, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself, at Robin Singh (activist). Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:35, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, Locaterobin. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Peepal Farm, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:35, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please don't use private email to discuss Wikipedia matters. The article talk page is the place to discuss this. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:17, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • And that there is another bad article doesn't mean all articles should be bad. Moreover, it is hard to see how someone would really have a conflict of interest with Nishtha. Drmies (talk) 17:18, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Read the references[edit]

Just because they may be a conflict of interest, does not meant there is! i am requesting you to read the references and then decide notability and see if the article seems biased by coi. Robin Singh (talk) 02:30, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please, read carefully the above message about conflict of interest. Whether the article is biased or not is irrelevant. You must comply with COI policies (or be blocked from Wikipedia). --MarioGom (talk) 11:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peepal Farm for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peepal Farm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peepal Farm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 03:40, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance of organization[edit]

unsure why the relevance is in question when links to articles about the organization and its work in major publications are cited Robin Singh (talk) 11:49, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Robin Singh, not relevance but WP:Notability is in Question, see our our guidelines for WP:NONPROFIT and WP:SIGCOV and then make your comment on the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peepal Farm page. --DBigXray 22:11, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
DBigXray thank you. It seems like after you cited sources for Peepal Farm's notability, the discussion was concluded and archived. -- Robin Singh (talk) 11:59, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Glad to help, Robin Singh . Me along with one more editor who agreed that this article is notable enough for an article deserve the credits. So the article stays. I have posted some messages above for you to review regarding Conflict of interest. Please do take care and always, post on the talk page of the article to request for a review of content that you would like to be added to the article. As always, include a reliable source for all your edits, Thanks for your contributions. cheers.--DBigXray 12:12, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Locaterobin (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 103.52.211.131. Robin Singh (talk) 08:53, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have confirmed this is a proxy via [1] and via my own test. You'll need to disable/shut down the proxy if you wish to edit here. Yamla (talk) 14:08, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That IP address is indeed a proxy. Are you editing in a different physical location than usual? Or, if you are using a VPN, you will need to turn it off. 331dot (talk) 09:00, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am editing from the same location :( Probably my ISP did some changes on their end. Robin Singh (talk)

Nomination of Vegan Friendly for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vegan Friendly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vegan Friendly until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MarioGom (talk) 22:10, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]