User talk:Looie496

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

If you leave a message for me here, I'll respond here. If I leave a message on your talk page, I'll look there for a response (but of course you can respond here if you want to).

DYK for Emerods[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors![edit]

please help translate this message into the local language
Wiki Project Med Foundation logo.svg The Cure Award
In 2015 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs, and we would love to collaborate further.

Thanks again :) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 03:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dopamine[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dopamine you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seppi333 -- Seppi333 (talk) 16:40, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Million Award#Million Award Hall of Fame[edit]

Million award logo.svg The Million Award
For your contributions to bring Dopamine (estimated annual readership: 1,300,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Seppi333 (Insert ) 21:49, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dopamine[edit]

The article Dopamine you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Dopamine for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seppi333 -- Seppi333 (talk) 22:02, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for doing the review. It's always great to have an article reviewed by somebody who actually understands the topic. Looie496 (talk) 17:10, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Congrats! T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 04:06, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Issues in Cerebellum article[edit]

Hi William,
I'm editor-in-chief of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, and we're about to consider a snapshot of the Cerebellum article for publication in this journal: Wikiversity Journal of Medicine/Cerebellum. This would make it easier for external sources to use and cite this work, and after we've advanced the journal these publications will be searchable in PubMed as well. First, however, all works need to undergo peer review. As you have perhaps been the most active contributor to this article, I am now asking you to look into the peer review comments of this article, and help amending the mentioned issues before publication in the journal: /Cerebellum#Peer review. You may also check at its history if another author has already done the corrections.
Best regards,
Mikael Häggström (talk) 12:26, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. The comments all seem valid, and I think it should be possible to address most if not all of them over the next few days. Looie496 (talk) 13:56, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
The article is now published. Let me know if you have any further questions. Mikael Häggström (talk) 14:18, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Also, we would like to keep you as corresponding author of the article. You should preferably have a public email address in in the article, but if you don't want that then you may use the Email this user function. Mikael Häggström (talk) 17:24, 15 July 2016 (UTC)