If you leave a message for me here, I'll respond here. If I leave a message on your talk page, I'll look there for a response (but of course you can respond here if you want to).
The article Dopamine you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dopamine for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seppi333 -- Seppi333 (talk) 22:02, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for doing the review. It's always great to have an article reviewed by somebody who actually understands the topic. Looie496 (talk) 17:10, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Issues in Cerebellum article
I'm editor-in-chief of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, and we're about to consider a snapshot of the Cerebellum article for publication in this journal: Wikiversity Journal of Medicine/Cerebellum. This would make it easier for external sources to use and cite this work, and after we've advanced the journal these publications will be searchable in PubMed as well. First, however, all works need to undergo peer review. As you have perhaps been the most active contributor to this article, I am now asking you to look into the peer review comments of this article, and help amending the mentioned issues before publication in the journal: /Cerebellum#Peer review. You may also check at its history if another author has already done the corrections.
Mikael Häggström (talk) 12:26, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks. The comments all seem valid, and I think it should be possible to address most if not all of them over the next few days. Looie496 (talk) 13:56, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- The article is now published. Let me know if you have any further questions. Mikael Häggström (talk) 14:18, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
tysm for your contributions!
|the edifying me award|
|Thank you so much for your work on the page glutamate (neurotransmitter)! it's like, glutamate is so important in neuro, of course it deserves its own page :) morsontologica (talk) 01:29, 25 August 2016 (UTC)|
Publishing Hippocampus in WikiJournal
It seems you have been the most active contributor the Hippocampus article as well , and therefore, would you like to join the process of having this one as well published in the journal (which have since been renamed to WikiJournal of Medicine)? As with The Cerebellum article, it would be great if we could make it easier for external sources to cite it, and eventually bring it to PubMed.
We would now want all main authors of Wikipedia works to agree with an Agreement for having the article published in the journal (so that any conflicts of interests can be declared). After I've invited the other main authors of the article, it can then undergo peer review, and I'd appreciate if you could then help out in amending any issues raised therein.
- This article has now been peer reviewed by a neuroscientist, discovering several issues: Wikiversity:The Hippocampus#Peer review comments
- I hope you can help out in amending these issues. Mikael Häggström (talk) 14:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Nomination of Norepinephrine (medication) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Norepinephrine (medication) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norepinephrine (medication) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Leyo 07:48, 29 November 2016 (UTC)