Think before you write.
If you want to talk with me, follow these simple rules:
- Make sure I can understand the message you are trying to convey
- Please link back to the article to which you are referring
- English only please, my native tongue of "New Yorker" was forcibly removed by NYC Dept of Ed speech therapists
- In the words of Winston Churchill: "short words are best, and the old words, when short, are best of all"
To start a new conversation create a new section at the end of the page, easily done by clicking "New section" along the top menu. Putting something in the middle will not be seen.
- 1 22.214.171.124 aka JCama 2
- 2 July 2016
- 3 Seminole Heights Page
- 4 Seminole Heights
- 5 Why did you undo my changes to the Penn Jillette article?
- 6 New Page Reviewer Newsletter
- 7 You reverted my edits on Harry Chapin page
- 8 Roller Hockey World Cup and Women's Roller Hockey World Cup pages
- 9 New Page Reviewer Newsletter
- 10 A barnstar for you!
- 11 A question
- 12 Reply (removed infobox)
- 13 ArbCom 2017 election voter message
- 14 New Page Reviewer Newsletter
126.96.36.199 aka JCama 2
I just want to tell you that the Information I put on Mary Ingalls and Carrie Ingalls are very true. Thank You— Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 11:30, 27 December 2015-(talk.— Preceding unsigned comment added by JCama 2 (talk • contribs) 11:30, 27 December 2015
Seminole Heights Page
Hello. My edits were completely constructive and factual. They provide a source that the "official seal" of Seminole Heights is a hoax. It also provides the original source the false seal claims to have come from—the 1912 Hillsborough High School Yearbook. I have access to the yearbook and this false seal does not appear anywhere in it's pages, and the faked seal doesn't even have the company name correct. Please cease reverting my changes as they are valid and sourced. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 4thgenTPA (talk • contribs)
When the source claims an image as proof that a seal existed in a year book, the only source that can refute that is an image of the original, unaltered source. What other source would you like me to provide? Certainly any other source would be second hand in this case. This isn't an image that disproves another image as factual, it's not being provided as a source to make a claim.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 4thgenTPA (talk • contribs)
Why did you undo my changes to the Penn Jillette article?
I linked several words which have Wikipedia pages devoted to them. Why did you un-link these words? It seems to me that un-linking them makes it that much harder for readers to find out more about some of those words...so what's your reasoning behind doing it? Chillowack (talk) 00:06, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- Please read MOS:OVERLINK about which words should generally not be linked. Also, the link to best-selling author is actually a redirect to a list of books of which Jillette is not listed and therefore should not be used. The explanation was given in the edit summary as well.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 00:11, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
You reverted my edits on Harry Chapin page
Please undo your revert of my edits. I added something to the biography section of the page that I feel should’ve been added. I cited evidence for this edit, therefore what I said is truthful. What did you find wrong with my edit? If it is a legitimate argument then I’ll gladly fix it. But if it isn’t I’m putting my edit back. Thanks. 2600:1004:B100:92B4:388E:12A5:EF4A:4C62 (talk) 16:30, 20 September 2017 (UTC)Brandon --☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 02:09, 3 September 2017 (UTC)\
- There is a generic format to follow which can be found at MOS:BLPLEAD. Basically, the lead is a summary, generally should not contain citations (references) as they would be in the body of the article, or contain subjective puff phrases or peacock statements. Also, as mentioned on the talk page of your other anonymous IP account, read up on edit warring.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 19:27, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. I understand my mistake now. Thank you for pointing that out for me. I read both wiki pages that you sent about puffing. That lead me to rephrase. I put at the end of the section, "Chapin has been described by many sources as one of the most popular songwriters of the 1970s" This is a verifiable fact. And the statement in general isn't false either. Chapin was one of the most popular songwriters of the 70s. Also, the editing war was solved with an agreement.
Roller Hockey World Cup and Women's Roller Hockey World Cup pages
Sorry, but could you change these two page titles' to World Skate Roller Hockey World Cup and World Skate Women's Roller Hockey World Cup like you did in this FIRS Intercontinental Cup to World Skate Intercontinental Cup? I'd be grateful.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk • contribs)
EDIT: Actually, It would be better if you removed the World Skate part from the Intercontinental Cup title (and the Roller Hockey World Cup and Women's Roller Hockey World Cup) and just let the Roller Hockey name because I don't know if in spite o being organized by World Skate the competitons' name changed.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk • contribs)
- Before any other renaming, find out the actual name of the tourney.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 23:08, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
A barnstar for you!
|The Minor barnstar|
|Thank you for reverting my accidental edit. All the best! Llacb47 (talk) 21:53, 30 October 2017 (UTC)|
Hi there. I thank you for issuing this warning. I am the blocking admin for that account, so I was wondering if you could let me know of what IP address that you suspect that editor is using to block evade. Let me know if you get the chance. Thanks! Sergecross73 msg me 14:05, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not absolutely certain and did not want to initiate an SPI, but seeing how Patricia CV just blanked the talk page it may be more convincing. It started with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio Disney Music Award for Best Band, an article the user created, then dispersed into the various RDMA award years. They were specifically asked to comment on this creation but apparently declined. Recently an IPv6 had the knowledge/experience to specifically undo my removal of these entries, (see  and ), followed by a user making a comment  and attempted to comment on the closed AFD. Although potentially unrelated, all of this is a bit on the suspicious side.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 23:12, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Reply (removed infobox)
Hi, rather message you than get into a stupid editing war. My reason for removing the infobox on this page link was that it, in my opinion is of very poor quality and could be done a lot better, if you disagree then so be it. My intention was to remove it until I had a better one as a replacement. apologies for the rushed response --JoshuaTaylor 02:18, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Rather than remove, improve or fix the infobox. They exist and seemingly serve a purpose.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 02:25, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Indeed. Remove this section if you wish. Regards --JoshuaTaylor 02:27, 29 November 2017 (UTC)