User talk:LuK3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
PC | UAA | AIV | RFPP | RFA | ACCG | BLP | New Pages | Filter Log | LOP | Teahouse | CSD Log | Feedback




ACC access[edit]

Hello Luke, I have unsuspended your account and welcome back, please subscribe to the ACC mailing list here, and IRC channel access will be set as soon as I can find someone to do it :P. Again welcome back Face-smile.svg P. S. Please review the guide as alot has changed. Mlpearc (open channel) 17:37, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

I've re-added the account creator right to your account. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 07:33, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi![edit]

Hi sorry I didnt know that was unreferenced since I was given the task by one of the people involed. I was hust paid to edit that. Sorry! Indiedesole (talk) 00:49, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

@Indiedesole: A few things. Number one, please read Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people, especially the policy on verifiability. You have to cite any additions to articles, especially of living people. In addition, you stated you were given the task of editing the article. You may want to read Wikipedia's policy about conflicts of interests. In addition, I'm not saying you are, however if you are paid for your contributions, you must disclose who is paying you. If you have any questions, feel free to reply back. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:56, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

About a page deletion[edit]

Hello LuK3,

I receive you massage right now and you ask me that not to remove Articles for deletion notice from a page but the problem is now I want to stop the discussion what I proposed as it take too long to delete the page so I want to apply speed deletion for the page.Now the problem I don't find any way to delete this page.Can you help me please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thikthik15 (talkcontribs) 13:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

@Thikthik15: I have closed your AfD nomination. Only administrators can delete articles. I highly recommend reading Wikipedia's deletion policy if you want to see if an article should be deleted. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:23, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

ACC[edit]

Hello Luke, can you fill me in on why acc:176483 is on hold? ~riley (talk) 23:38, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Riley, it looks like I was going to work on that request later, but unfortunately didn't have time. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:23, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
In the future please break reservation, this would have saved a five day delay in response which is unacceptable. ~riley (talk) 01:04, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Jim Miklaszewski[edit]

Source conflict? Does not adhere? http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/jim-miklaszewski-retiring-from-nbc-news/291405

AdWeek is a reputable industry publication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wxjunkie0 (talkcontribs) 14:32, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Wxjunkie0, thanks for the note. I read over that article and it seems to be a reliable source to be included in the BLP article. If you need any help with adding the information, feel free to message me back! -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:35, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
I'm not retyping everything you deleted. Thanks for wasting my time. Wxjunkie0 (talk) 14:37, 18 July 2016 (UTC)wxjunkie
@Wxjunkie0: here is the diff to the edit you made, if you want to re-edit the article. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:40, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Faiz Syed for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Faiz Syed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faiz Syed until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. for (;;) (talk) 14:22, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

American Solidarity Party[edit]

I see that you have supported deletion of the entry for the American Solidarity Party. The party has only become really active in the last couple of months - but membership has grown and there are now chapters in a number of states, a central committee was formed in early July, and folks are working to get on as many ballots as possible for this fall.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1CBGJpQYqOThtl1WBxXoeBv3LH_HDv1nLSVZiQjvEwLY/edit#gid=0

In addition, the party has now gotten mention in First Things - http://www.firstthings.com/tag/american-solidarity-party.

Please reconsider your vote to delete for now as the Party is seeking to grow.

Thank you.

Lee Strong — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.101.178.225 (talk) 15:08, 29 July 2016 (UTC)