Jump to content

User talk:Ludington Historian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Information icon Hello, I'm SandyGeorgia. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.

Also, be sure to have a look at WP:EDITWAR and WP:3RR. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:59, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Spicy (talk) 19:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ludington Historian (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am writing to request an unblock for my account on Wikipedia. I understand that my actions in creating a hoax and using multiple accounts were a serious violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and I deeply regret my actions.

I understand that my actions have caused harm to the Wikipedia community and its readers, and I am willing to take full responsibility for my actions. I am willing to cooperate with Wikipedia administrators in any way necessary to make amends for my behavior and to help ensure that such violations do not occur in the future.
I would like to assure the Wikipedia community that I have learned from my mistake, and I am committed to following all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines in the future. I understand that the trust of the community must be earned, and I am willing to work hard to regain that trust.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Ludington Historian

Decline reason:

It appears that you used ChatGPT or similar to write an unblock request on your behalf, which is not a persuasive way to assure anyone that you are not going to continue editing disruptively. Please see Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks and write an unblock request in your own words. Aoidh (talk) 04:28, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ludington Historian (talk) 23:09, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ludington Historian (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I am writing to request an unblock for my account on Wikipedia. I understand that my previous actions were in violation of the site's policies, and I deeply regret any harm or inconvenience that I may have caused.

I admit that I was using multiple accounts on Wikipedia, which is strictly prohibited. I was also caught using ChatGPT to write responses, which is a violation of Wikipedia's policy on automated editing. I understand that these actions were unethical and that they undermined the integrity of the site.

I would like to take this opportunity to apologize to the Wikipedia community and to the administrators who were tasked with dealing with my misconduct. I assure you that I have learned from my mistakes, and I am committed to following all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines in the future.

If you decide to grant me an unblock, I will be grateful for the opportunity to contribute to the site once again. I promise to conduct myself with honesty and integrity, and to work collaboratively with other editors to improve the quality of the articles on Wikipedia.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely, Ludington Historian

Decline reason:

Please write a request in your own words. We don't need a lengthy apology, please simply tell us what you did wrong, what you will do differently in the future, and what edits you plan to make. If you appear to make another bot generated request, you will lose access to this page. 331dot (talk) 08:07, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment - It is very obvious that this is another ChatGPT-generated unblock request. I advise you to rewrite this request in your own words. - Aoidh (talk) 06:52, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ludington Historian (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I won't use computer aided text any further. I didn't know it was against policy to use chatgpt to help write responses. If unbanned, I will make edits to pages about science fiction novels mostly

Decline reason:

A review of your contributions and my use of the CU tool indicate quite strongly that you're here to troll, and I think we've had enough of that. TPA revoked. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:54, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can you discuss the specific reasons for the block(Clearly not here to build an encyclopedia: addition of hoaxes, probable sock, cf. User:Lynn who is ready, User:Toenails as a substitute for parmesan etc.)? Please place your responses below. 331dot (talk) 08:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]