User talk:Luwanglinux

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

past discussion at archive

Your mail[edit]

Hello Luwanglinux! I received your mail. Here's my reply:-

Haoreima thanks but most of these seems not peer reviewed sources and I doubt it can fulfil reliability of historicity 🐲 ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ ^{ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk)} 02:59, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Your recent editing history at Thangjing Hill shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Kautilya3 (talk) 22:49, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have done three reverts already. Better watch out! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 22:51, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Thangjing Hill. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 10:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Specific policy-based objections have been raised at Talk:Thangjing Hill#OR and SYNTHESIS for your new content. You cannot reinstate it without addressing those issues. Propose your proposed revisions on the talk page and obtain WP:CONSENSUS. Your sourcing, your understanding of those sources, and the reliability of those source are all under dispute'. You are attempting to railroad dubious content. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:05, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kautilya3 With due respect remove only the contested part from my edit but it seem you have continuously removed other NPOV of other events without giving any reason and reverted to your preferred version more than 3 times which include a disputed content from History section 🐲 ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ ^{ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk)} 11:24, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When you make lots of edits in quick succession, it is difficult to disentagle them. We need to discuss and achieve CONSENSUS on the big issues, which you have put at the very top of the History section. Please focus on that first. Wikipedia has no deadline.

As for my content that you have disputed, we have been discussing it continuously, and I believe that some suitable rewording can be found that satisfies both of us. For the present, I prefer my old content to remain because moving or removing it destroys the narrative. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You also need to exhibit more parience in dealing with disputed issues. You wrote three messages on the talk page between 5:06 and 6:00 UTC, and immediately did a massive revert at 6:25 UTC. That is bordering on WP:BATTLEGROUND editing. You need to give at least 24 hours for the other party to respond because people work in different time zones etc, not to mention other commitments they may have in their real life. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kautilya3 Ok, so is it ok for me to write the rewording as you suggested without moving the content? 🐲 ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ ^{ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk)} 11:43, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is best to propose revised content on the talk page, along with citations. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:08, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Vasa (ship) on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Laishang[edit]

The article Laishang has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources. Dictionary definition.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PepperBeast (talk) 20:59, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As suggested I have added references from books journal and removed the deletion tag. I will expand this stub article soon. Thanks 🐲 ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ ^{ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk)} 07:42, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Israel–Hamas war on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]