User talk:MFlet1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, MFlet1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  DS 18:22, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Bretch hill[edit]

in an edit to the article bretch hill you included orchard fields into the schools section, i would consider orchard fields in neithrop especiaqlly as it used to be neithrop infants and junior school. seing as many people think that they are the same estate do you think i should merge the article neithrop i was about to create? Thatperson 07:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Yes, that might be a good idea. I included Orchard Fields based on the fact that I grew up on the Bretch Hill estate and went to that school myself (when it was still called the Neithrop) and knew lots of other children from the estate who went there too (though admittedly this was before William Morris existed). Perhaps the main article should be Neithrop and Bretch Hill should be a subsection within it. MFlet1 11:39, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

ive expanded the article to include neithrop, also do you have any idea about the boundries of neithrop/brecth hill, i say this because i may add some more on churches later and im not sure which estate the fairway church falls into. Thatperson

I'm not sure there's any official boundary but I tend to think of Hastings Road, Prescott Avenue and Edmunds Road as all being part of the Bretch Hill estate as they were built at the same time, and The Fairway, Withycombe Drive etc as being part of Neithrop.MFlet1 14:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

i glad i found you online, do you know anything about other estates in the town because i think it would be good if we could have an article (or conjoined ones) about ewach estate in the town, i may do hardwick ruscote later as i know quite a bit about them both. i notice oxford has articles on each ward so it may be a good idea to sdo the same for banbury. Thatperson 19:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi again, in answer to your question, I don't really know anything about the other estates as I've hardly ever visited them! MFlet1 21:54, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar[edit]

Original Barnstar.png The Original Barnstar
A lot of hard work, A lot gone unnoticed. I cant believe you havent got one of these before, keep up the good work. :) Thatperson 17:03, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Cheers TP!

Samantha Juste[edit]

See my comments on the talk page. Bit patronising to say it, I know, but if you were in your 50s and not 40, you would KNOW that S Juste was the only British Samantha of the 1960s! Even so, have taken our for now. The Bewitched link is probably relevant - most likely the source of her adoptive name - but, again, although I didn't say it was, some evidence is needed. So I suppose I agree with you, in a way!IXIA 06:37, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. I do apologise for its tone: you are almost certainly right that she couldn't have got the name from Bewitched, but there's no doubt that - as every schoolboy knew at the time! - there were really only two Samanthas - Elizabeth M and Sam J. Anyway, I've revised and will try to improve further. Really grateful for comments. Best wishes. IXIA 18:15, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Henry Cosby[edit]

Hi I guess, you misunderstood the Edit on this page. It was not vandalism but an actual fact. Hi did die after a cardiac bypass sugery at that hospital 162.82.215.199 19:29, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

You're right, and in fact I found this out afterwards by Googling and re-instated his death date in the article. I suppose I assumed it was vandalism because of the "GO HANK!" at the end of it. MFlet1 23:09, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Cheers[edit]

thanks for the barnstar, banbury now has a 1:960 article:population ratio lol :) Thatperson 12:31, 21 January 2007 (UTC)


Hey MFlet1, my apologies if you feel the added reference to the banbury page (after Kraft Foods) was not relevant, but I thought it was for the following reason: Kraft food's is the world's larget coffee producer, Westminster is one of the few (if not the only) UK independent Anti-Terror company. Also, Banbury is its hometown, and Tony Baldry, the Banbury MP, has even spoken of the company which led to a debate in the House of Commons over supplying hardware to the British forces in Iraq. Hence, why I assumed it was relevant?! It hosts some of the world's most sophisticated equipment and many famous foreign representatives, to mention no names, who end up spending time in Banbury. Your thoughts? Mcneillg 12:38, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

re: Category:Date of birth missing[edit]

Good evening. Per the discussion about privacy concerns expressed at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Privacy of birthdays, date of birth should generally not be added to the biographies of living non-public or semi-public figures. So far, that policy has been interpreted fairly strictly with a pretty high bar being set for the definition of "public figures" who are assumed to have given up their rights to privacy.

By the same token, we should not be adding Category:Date of birth missing to articles unless we have made the case that the person meets the "public figures" threshold. Otherwise, we're just baiting new users into adding content even though the community has already said that we shouldn't include that particular data point. Category:Year of birth missing is okay but the exact date is often not. Thanks for your help. Rossami (talk) 23:37, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

The article I tripped over was [Bredin]. Thanks. Rossami (talk) 14:48, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Crime in Leeds[edit]

Are we adding the crime section in Leeds from the discussion page or not. If no-one has any objections then I'll add it, and if they do, then I'd like to hear their reasons. I've lived in Leeds my whole life and can say all the crime roumers people hear are all true.

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice[edit]

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 23:49, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Reversed modification about "Substitute" by the Clout[edit]

Hi Mflet1, I have reversed you redirect to the Righteous Bros. I'm could not complies with your opinion since this page is dedicated to the Clout single, using the cover. Another wikipedian had moved the content of this page to the one named Righteous Bros, Substitute song. If the content is so similar, this is the answer. I have also moded the Righteous Bros page in the past, in order to avoid duplicate in the fair use licence devoted to the single cover. I hope you will agree, despite of my poor grammar. Kumeon (talk) 16:29, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Banbury Cross[edit]

Hi. You've just removed my image on Banbury. If Banbury is known for one thing it is its cross. Yet there was no picture of it, despite the article describing it in detail, and its approximation to the new 'fine lady' statue. My carefully composed picture shows both. Perhaps you should have removed the other picture if you consider two pictures to be 'overkill'? ♦ Jongleur100 talk 13:53, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

You've got a point actually. I didn't realise there were no other photos of the cross in the article... Have now reinstated your photo and removed the other one. MFlet1 (talk) 21:53, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. ♦ Jongleur100 talk 23:43, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Jessica Alba/Larry David[edit]

Hello, You reverted my edits on these pages. I think ethnic background is appropriate for wikipedia. I have references for the statements, as follows. I have been trying to replace the edits but keep getting error messages, as I think wikipedia is having problems today.

Trailmixjustin (talk) 15:18, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

York meetup[edit]

Hi MFlet1. Just to let you know there is a Wikimedia meetup being planned in York for Tuesday. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:34, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jegsy Dodd[edit]

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Jegsy Dodd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, Speedy delete contest button.png. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 01:30, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Paul Heaton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Woolwich attack[edit]

What was said was said. You cannot correct the grammar of a direct transcript. If the man said "a eye for a eye" then that is the way it must remain.

Amandajm (talk) 11:51, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

I agree, but I have to admit I didn't watch the video and thought it was an error by the person transcribing rather than an exact quote. If it's the latter then arguably it ought to say "[sic]" to make this clear. MFlet1 (talk) 12:11, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Leeds meetup[edit]

Hello! I don't know if you're aware but there is a wikimedia meet up in Leeds this Saturday (14 June) if you're interested. Hopefully you can make it. Regards IJA (talk) 17:51, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of the Smiths' live performances, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lancaster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Steve Coogan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Thomson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of the Smiths' live performances, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Royal Concert Hall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

David Brough[edit]

Hi, I see that you made this edit - I don't need to check the source to know that it's correct. David and I were in the same year at the same school when he decided to run. The legality of his nomination was questioned because of his age - he was still 17 years old at the time (I was 18) - until we found out that it was perfectly legal for him to stand for election, although if elected he wouldn't be allowed to take his seat until his 18th birthday. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:54, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi - yes, I was also at the same school at the same time, though in the year below. In fact the minimum age for MPs was 21 in those days so even if he'd already turned 18 he wouldn't have been able to take his seat in the (to say the least) unlikely event of getting elected. One other fact I remember, and which I've been able to verify thanks to Wikipedia, is that he got more votes than Lord Sutch himself who was standing in the same election in Finchley! MFlet1 (talk) 12:22, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Great - were you at that school from age 11, or did you transfer there at 16? --Redrose64 (talk) 13:35, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Transferred at 16 (from Drayton). MFlet1 (talk) 14:34, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
I was Warriner until 16. I do remember some kids from Drayton, but forgot all their names years ago. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:12, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Regarding the 1979 election - "M White" was our history teacher at Warriner. I'm pretty sure his first name is Martin or possibly Malcolm.
Regarding the October 1974 election - "J Barbour" might be Julian Barbour, who has lived at South Newington since at least 1969. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:50, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
OK, thanks for that. I've tried to find sources for that but haven't found anything. Also, if it really was the physicist Julian Barbour who stood as an "Independent English Nationalist", you'd think that there'd be something on his website that would hint at such a worldview, but I can't see anything. MFlet1 (talk) 11:21, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Julian Barbour was certainly involved in politics - he stood in local elections in the late 1970s or early 1980s, although I don't recall whether for Labour or Liberal/SDP - he definitely didn't stand for the Conservatives. His brother David also stood occasionally, again I don't recall whether for Labour or Liberal/SDP. --Redrose64 (talk) 12:11, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
In chapter 16 of "The End of Time" (found via Google Books) it states that for a couple of years in the early 1980s he gave up physics and was active in the SDP. Also I found this Banbury Guardian article about him taking part in an anti-war protest in 2003. So it could be him standing in '74, though being in the SDP doesn't seem to chime with being an "English nationalist" very well. MFlet1 (talk) 11:58, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Ah, chapter 16 (p. 238) - I've not read that far, giving up round about chapter 11. --Redrose64 (talk) 13:50, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, MFlet1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

  1. ^ "Jessica Alba stunned as TV show DNA test shows she is descended from Europeans". Retrieved 2009-12-02. 
  2. ^ "Extra TV Larry David's Surprising DNA Test on Lopez Tonight". Retrieved 2009-12-02.