- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Limit of a sequence was changed by MahbubAlam03 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953121 on 2013-11-14T09:26:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:26, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
- I agree with ClueBot; your edit is not constructive. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 09:58, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thinking it over, there is no need for additional examples with a known limit. A sequence with an unknown limit might be more interesting. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 10:06, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
- Would you please stop making unnecessary changes to articles, and adding proofs without reason. Also,
Your recent editing history at Limit of a sequence shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 10:17, 14 November 2013 (UTC)