User talk:Mailer diablo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


How could a local chapter assist the copyright donation process?[edit]

Hi mailer diablo,

My name is Liang, and I am a board member from Wikimedia Taiwan. We are encountering an issue with OTRS now. Here's the story-- There is a family in our city who get in touch with our chapter, they meet us in person and express that their passed away father left a Taiwanese-Mandarin Dictionary. Their father authorize the dictionary to be printed in paper by a local publisher in 2000 here, and now the copyright is back to the family. Few weeks ago the family contacted Reke, our secretariat of the chapter, to express they want their father's work to be released on Wikimedia projects. They wish to make the work as accessible as possible.

This is a really exciting news for us in the chapter. There are programmer who is working on the modification of the printing files to Wiki source, and there are also some culture events ideas are brainstormed for demonstrating the way to use the dictionary. However, we are not quite sure how to handle this properly with the OTRS process.

Since the members in the family are all elders, it's highly difficult for them to use email to conduct the OTRS process. In the consent email template on Wikicommons, we found the following description: "If you are releasing a work that is not available online, you may be required to provide proof of your identity. If you are releasing a work where you are acting on the copyright holder's behalf, you may be required to provide proof of authorization to work on the copyright holder's behalf." Looks like we can provide some documents to the OTRS team without their direct email, is it correct? If so, then could you give us some previous cases or the paper consent template to show us what kind of "useful proofs" we should provide to the OTRS team.

Thank you for your patience and we are looking for your feedback.


Liang (WMTW) (talk) 05:08, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the advice, I have sent the . --Liang (WMTW) (talk) 15:59, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar Hires.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
This is the closest one I could find to indicate "Hey, you're still here after all these years: much respect". So, much respect, even respek. Drmies (talk) 15:29, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox train[edit]

Template:Infobox Underground stock has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox train. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:51, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

SIR I AM READY FOR THE QUIZ/TEST (talk) 19:28, 27 March 2015 (UTC) Hello Mailer Diablo,

Will you provide an adequate reason for why you deleted the Traditonal Britian Group in 2006? Are you a member?

I do not hereby agree to the following when I press "save page" below: <<By clicking the "Save page" button, you agree to the Terms of Use and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL with the understanding that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient for CC BY-SA 3.0 attribution>> — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 19:40, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dallas Buyers Club (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to M1
Odex's actions against file-sharing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to M1

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Protection from Harassment Act 2014[edit]

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 07:47, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Mailer diablo. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Rider ranger47 Talk 00:18, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Atomic Nucleus[edit]

In the second paragraph of this article, it states; the ratio of the nucleus of a hydrogen atom to it's overall size is 145,000:1. This does not compute; the nuclear diameter is 1.75x 10(to-15)M and the overall diameter is 40x 10(to-12)M this calculates to be 22,800:1 which is within 2.5% of the 23,300:1 ratio for U238!!!!!!!! This is a major error and very misleading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 10:56, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Request to use photograph on Clementi Bus Interchange for a smart phone trail[edit]

Dear Sir/Mdm,

I am writing to you to request permission to use your photograph of the old bus interchange in Clementifor a smartphone trail around Clementi that we would be carrying out for students and some members of the public. It is for educational purposes and used to educate our students and public on the rich heritage and history of Clementi Neighbourhood.

Do let me know it if is possible to use the photographs. You can email me at

regards, Yehidaah HOD/Humanities Clementi Town Sec School — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 01:53, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

  • Sure, as long as you follow the stated license. - Mailer Diablo 07:47, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Your assistance please...[edit]

You closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church Street as delete.

Could you please restore the revision history?

Almost ten years or so ago a small handful of contributors made a flood of nominations, and another flood of unilateral merges and redirections of articles on Toronto streets and roadways. Reviewing those AFD I see quite a few questionable arguments. I see the nominators claiming the deletions were based on policy, but most of their claims seemed specious, based on hand-waving, not based on policy at all.

In this AFD two of the respondents said "Delete this article on a Church Street, because, so far as I am concerned, the only notable Church Street is my local Church Street." If I were an administrator, and I had closed this AFD, I would have put on my hat as an educator, and explicitly stated I had discounted these opinions where were classic examples of the kinds of bad arguments warned about in WP:Arguments to Avoid.

It is almost ten years later, and almost all the deleted articles are now redirects, or have been turned back into meaningful articles. I've turned a dozen or so of them back into meaningful articles myself, and would have found this a lot easier if I had the original revision history to start from.

If those deletions were done today there is a good chance the deleting administrator would have left the revision history visible, for just this reason. Almost all the roads deleted in this flood of AFD measure up to our notability criteria. Almost all the deletions were made because the 2006 versions were badly written, lacked references, and lacked other information that established their notability. Nevertheless, articles on topics that are notable, should be deleted cautiously, when the sole problem lies with the current article being poorly written or otherwise falling short of our standards.

Restoration of the revision history assists anyone who wants to write an article that does measure up to the standards of 2015.

So, could you please restore the revision history?

Thanks Geo Swan (talk) 20:42, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

  • WRT my request for restoration of the revision history of Church Street (Toronto) -- could you please be explicit here? Did you simply overlook this request? Or did you wish me to interpret your missing reply as your way of telling me to make my request at DRV?
Personally, if you think you had a good reason why you shouldn't agree to restore the history, I would prefer you share it with me now. If I am convinced we will be saving the time and energy of all those fine people who would have ended up reading my request, if you hadn't talked me out of it. Geo Swan (talk) 20:07, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Kawasaki Heavy Industries C151[edit]

The Wikipedia Library needs you![edit]

Wikipedia Library owl.svg

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

  • Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
  • Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
  • Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
  • Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
  • Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
  • Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Dance Me This[edit]

The article of that name was recommended for deletion and significant new information now exists. Namely, the unreleased album has been released. Thus the primary objection is no longer valid and all objections stem from the primary one. Hagrinas (talk) 23:38, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Standard Offer unblock request for Technophant[edit]

Technophant (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Technophant has requested an unblock under the standard offer. As one of about 60 editors who has contributed to User talk:Technophant you may have an interest in this request. Sent by user:PBS via -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:48, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

You Have deleted My Page.[edit]


i want to start a page on West London Deep, i can not do this as you have deleted a page in 2007. Can you help please.


David — Preceding unsigned comment added by London Deep (talkcontribs) 13:44, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Please sign new Wikimedia confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information by 15 December[edit]

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.

Wmf logo vert pms.svg

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are beginning the transition to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 22 December 2015) to retain their access. You are receiving this email because you have access to nonpublic information and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. The general confidentiality agreement is now ready, and the OTRS agreement will be ready after 22 September 2015. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me ( Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 22 December 2015) to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

Thank you,
Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 23:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC) • TranslateGet help

Timothy Dwight Hobart[edit]

The copyright vio tag should be removed from this article. The tag has been there for months, but the article is correct. Billy Hathorn (talk) 02:44, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Singapore MRT disruptions, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages North-South Line and East-West Line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Page creation on Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Crystal Movers C810 and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Crystal Movers C810A[edit]

As we are telling you to be editing on the newest page called Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Crystal Movers C810 and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Crystal Movers C810A and create as much as you can. So they can find more information on what is C810 and C810A

Please be created C810 and C810A by Today onwards.

Unsigned comment at 00:17, 17 October 2015 from — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk)

Raphael Lataster[edit]

This page was deleted over eight years ago, but I don't want to contest that deletion process. It's just that Lataster has since stepped up his game, writing several more books and getting various coverages for them. He's fairly indubitably notable now. Blessings!! Pandeist (talk) 23:52, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

  • I've made essentially an all-new page and just moved it to Raphael Lataster. If it meets muster, could you undelete the previous page's history so I can pick through it for anything usable for the renovated? Blessings!! Pandeist (talk) 22:25, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Recent Edits to "The Battle of Nordlingen 1634"[edit]

Dear Sirs,

I have over the past few days made numerous edits to Wiki's "The Battle of Nordlingen 1634".

New information was added from Cecily V. Wedgwood's "The Thity Years War". A number of tweaks were made, mostly to improve usage.

I should mention my footnotes appear in the main body. What remains to be done is to integrate these in the proper order to the existing footnote section and then add the source to the bibliography as well.


Bob Holden — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kongabonga11 (talkcontribs) 08:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Korea Coast Guard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Help me,please.[edit]

Hi I am A9b6008 and I hope you can read my letter.Sorry my English is poor.So if you don't understand my mean. Please check Chinese. I am interested in write wiki in Ban Nan gu (Taiwanese)and it is sure that its website has 44000 information there.But I found that it was too low-quality for its page.And I try to fix that.But I couldn't since it's system use Roma alphabet,not for Chinese word. You are Singapore people,right?Perhaps you can speak a little Taiwanese.It is quite strange for China or Taiwan people to read Roma alphabet. We can't read it and that's why Ban Nan gu's quality was so low. I hope you can help to change the Ban Nan gu's system and policy.For Roma alphabet to Chinese word.Whatever,please communicate with me.Thanks!! 我對寫閩南語的維基感到有興趣,它有許多條目了,但我發現它的條目品質都不好,由於系統使用羅馬拼音而非漢字,導致我無法(99%的閩南語使用人口也無法)讀得百分百了解,也沒辦法做更好的修正。 你是新加坡人吧,或許你會一點台語(閩南語),要讓中國大陸或臺灣的民眾閱讀羅馬拼音是非常奇怪的事情,我們讀不懂,這也是為什麼閩南語維基的品質這麼差,我希望你可以協助更改閩南語維基的政策與系統,讓它全部使用漢字拼音,謝謝你,無論如何請與我聯絡。 — Preceding unsigned comment added by A9b6008 (talkcontribs) 15:58, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Canadian Maple Leaf Coins[edit]

Article is found at:

This statement is no longer true, and contradicts information in the article itself:

"In 2005, the Liberation of the Netherlands triple privy silver Maple Leaf—the rarest of all Silver Maple Leaf coins—was struck by the Royal Canadian Mint for the Royal Dutch Mint."

It is wrong, because in 2014 the Year of the Horse with Hieroglyphic Double Privy had a mintage of 1,000, while the 2005 issue referred to above had a mintage of 3,500.

Thank you!

Garry S. Shay

Picture of narrows bridge[edit]

Hi Mailer,

We would like to use your image on our new website as one of our projects. Back in 2001 Best Bar supplied the reinforcing steel for the bridge.

If you could get back to me at

Thankyou — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 02:03, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Need your guidance...[edit]

Hello Mailer diablo, I am re-writing a new Raquela article. I desperately need your guidance. Can you tell me what I should add, change or edit out? Iamroger (talk) 19:20, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

File:OpeningMRT.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:OpeningMRT.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Marchjuly (talk) 04:54, 24 December 2015 (UTC) -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:54, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Help decide the future of Wikimania[edit]

Wikimania logo with text.svg

The Wikimedia Foundation is currently running a consultation on the value and planning process of Wikimania, and is open until 18 January 2016. The goals are to (1) build a shared understanding of the value of Wikimania to help guide conference planning and evaluation, and (2) gather broad community input on what new form(s) Wikimania could take (starting in 2018).

After reviewing the consultation, we'd like to hear your feedback on on this survey.

In addition, feel free to share any personal experiences you have had at at a Wikimedia movement conference, including Wikimania. We plan to compile and share back outcomes from this consultation in February.

With thanks,

I JethroBT (WMF) (talk), from Community Resources 23:46, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Opinion of applying for administrator privileges[edit]

Hello, I was looking in the Wikipedia:Request an RfA nomination to see anyone that might consider reviewing a particular wikipedian

Their name is Titaniumman23. Over a 6 month period, they have made a lot of edits regarding sport, especially basketball and american football. Do you think this user is administrator ready or what advice could you offer.

Thank you, i really appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kane The Athlete (talkcontribs) 07:31, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Towards a New Wikimania results[edit]

Wikimania logo with text.svg

Last December, I invited you to share your views on the value of Wikimedia conferences and the planning process of Wikimania. We have completed analysis of these results and have prepared this report summarizing your feedback and important changes for Wikimania starting in 2018 as an experiment. Feedback and comments are welcome at the discussion page. Thank you so much for your participation. I JethroBT (WMF), Community Resources, 22:47, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

White paper edits[edit]

Hello. Shall we chat about the white paper page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 10:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Edits on Singapore buses[edit]

Hi, I'm wondering if the WAB logo should be included in List of bus routes in Singapore. Some UK people think that the logo makes the page a guide and reverted my edits under WP:NOTGUIDE. I would like to seek for help and if you can do anything about this issue. Thanks. 33ryantan (talk) 16:00, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Right, 33ryantan, please check on List of bus routes in Singapore everyday, this UK people don't know about Singapore very well, hope you contact to block UK users for 1 week. Hope you can take about that. I am shy of doing this. Why can't you do it? Hope will no get blocked.03:35, 6 March 2016 (UTC)FJY (talk)
Mailerdiablo, can you please semi protected for List of bus routes in Singapore for 1 month because these UK users got no knowledge. Please semi protect the page. And once you protect, i want to warn them to bother about London bus pages. 33ryantan i'm solving the case. And block them if they revert one more time. 03:38, 6 March 2016 (UTC)FJY (talk)

Changchun Bombardier Movia C951[edit]

Hello, there is only ONE Bombardier Movia to be served in Singapore, i know there is CNR Changchun that I understand, but just to let you know there is ONLY ONE Bombardier Movia which was C951. Pls revert back to usual Bombardier Movia C951 and don't ever revert until there is second batch of Bonbardier Movia to be tendered to Singapore. C751C and C830C is still okay because there is also C751A and C830 by Alstom Metropolis so should not be reverted. But when there is one train according to their train manufacturers don't need to revert unless if you need to move but just don't until when the another batch comes to Singapore MRT.03:54, 6 March 2016 (UTC)FJY (talk)

Also, can you help us by moving for C151C to Kawasaki Heavy Industries & CSR Qingdao Sifang C151C for the official name for C151C.03:56, 6 March 2016 (UTC)FJY (talk)

Updating SMRT Bus Photo ([edit]


The SMRT bus photo on this wiki ( is outdated. Is it possible to change it to an updated photo approved by SMRT?

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fjoannepc (talkcontribs) 04:38, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kawasaki Heavy Industries C151[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kawasaki Heavy Industries C151 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 14:20, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kawasaki Heavy Industries C151[edit]

The article Kawasaki Heavy Industries C151 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kawasaki Heavy Industries C151 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 20:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kawasaki Heavy Industries C151[edit]

The article Kawasaki Heavy Industries C151 you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Kawasaki Heavy Industries C151 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 05:21, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Paged.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Paged.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:38, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Dave Teo for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dave Teo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Teo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:26, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Self-reuqested block[edit]

From 18 April 2016, i requested to take a short WikiBreak for one month due to my examinations, if you know means I cannot ask any requires of each messages which i will take about one month to prepare. And i'll get back after one month break is over. And i'll be taking Exams soon again. My block will be email disabled, account creation blocked and I will not edit my own page for next one month.13:25, 17 April 2016 (UTC)Jepbdpop (talk)

The time, my talkpage access will be removed from 18 April 2016 to 5 May 2016. Once my exams is over, i'll ask to unblock me. But now i'm waiting for a self-requested block. My talkpage access will be removed from 18 April 2016 to 5 May 2016.13:30, 17 April 2016 (UTC)Jepbdpop (talk)

DYK for Kawasaki Heavy Industries C151[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 27 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kawasaki Heavy Industries C151, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that competition for the contract to build Singapore's first MRT trains (pictured) was so fierce that it involved last-minute discounts, offers of free parts, and allegations of sabotage? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kawasaki Heavy Industries C151. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Kawasaki Heavy Industries C151), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:37, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Kawasaki Heavy Industries C151[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:37, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for Adminship[edit]

HI Mailer, MY name is Syed Wasiq. I am an enthusiastic teen who thinks that he can change the general opinion of my country that Wikipedia contains irrelevant and vandalized information. Please make a nomination for me so that I can edit the information which is inaccurate and prove to the audience that Wikipedia contains highly accurate and factual information. Hope you nominate me. Yours, Wasiq — Preceding unsigned comment added by Syed Wasiq (talkcontribs) 17:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Glenn Jahnke.jpg listed for discussion[edit]


A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Glenn Jahnke.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 18:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

‎Amendment request on arbitration decision against Rodhullandemu[edit]

You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Amendment request: Rodhullandemu and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.

Thanks, --George Ho (talk) 06:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)


Do you have any views on the speedy deletion nomination of File:Lovebythebridge.jpg? Thanks, Mackensen (talk) 01:12, 14 July 2016 (UTC)