User talk:MaoGo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome!

Hello, MaoGo! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 09:16, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carlos Medina (December 29)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 18:43, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Carlos Medina has a new comment[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Carlos Medina. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 23:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carlos Medina has been accepted[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
Carlos Medina, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Mr. Guye (talk) 14:43, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diamagnetism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Effective mass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SciPost Physics (March 5)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Headbomb was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:56, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fermi gas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plasma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Free electron model, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloch's theorem (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Didn't see my mistake that I did to Robinson Technologies with the Android link. But, thanks for fixing it for me!―YoloMaxi  (contribs) 22:58, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 12[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fine electronic structure, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamiltonian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Page Move Discussion[edit]

Hello, I see that you've edited the article on Rajneesh. I would like to ask you to give your thought on the page move discussion. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Rajneesh#Requested_move_11_June_2018 Accesscrawl (talk) 07:17, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi here is the pdf of reference [1][edit]

Before speaking too soon I advise you to actually read the paper first and don't make please any rush conclusions....

and reconsider you vote on the AfD. Rememeber even Hall effect sensors are ferromagnetic...


see fig. 8 in pdf, there were there all the time, right under our nose!...

https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.08751 (pdf)

I guess there is a lot a confusion on the matter. The confusion relies because you think as monopoles as magnetic charge particles like electrons are for Electricity. These are not definitive discovered as we all know although there is much research ongoing.

This paper does not talk about magnetic monopoles directly. However paper is giving out all the hints suggesting that the poles of a magnet itself are each a macro scopic monopoles. This is because the lower potential ground state flux made possible to be observed by the superparamagnetic (not ferromagnetic) ferrolens shows no immediate and direct flux between the two poles of a magnet but rather loops between each pole and the domain wall of the magnet in the middle (see fig.8) which is about 100nm thick. Therefore making up two distinct magnetic monopole bubbles. So, dipole magnet consists of two opposite separate monopole fields tangent at the Bloch domain wall since there is no direct flux connection between the two pole of a magnet. Imagine it like a brain structure.

Kind Regards,

sorry I forgot to sign,

I saw you post on the AfD, I did not know that this was for bitten.

Markoulw (talk) 21:52, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

@Markoulw: Ok, I just edited my comment. --MaoGo (talk) 22:20, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Orbital angular momentum of free electrons[edit]

@MaoGo:, thanks for the nice theory section! I adjusted the figure as you suggested, and made one sentence in the theory section more specific to distinguish between preparation and measurement of OAM states (both of which can produce an electron OAM eigenstate).Tyharvey313 (talk) 12:22, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svgHello, MaoGo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 29[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jurin's law, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Meniscus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Capillary action into Jurin's law. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:52, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:SciPost Physics[edit]

Hello, MaoGo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SciPost Physics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 19:39, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

@Dolotta: thanks for the notice. I wish to recover the article but not recover the title of the draft, I would like a userfication, how do I do this? --MaoGo (talk) 21:37, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
MaoGo -- Go to WP:REFUND and request undeletion using the exact title (Draft:SciPost Physics). The only thing different you have to do in the request is to ask for it to be userfied. -- Dolotta (talk) 00:02, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Guaido[edit]

Hi Any source said that Guaido is acting president. --Panam2014 (talk) 15:18, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

@Panam2014:, I have not found an "explicit" source either. --MaoGo (talk) 16:39, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
he was ready to assume the country's presidency. See here He is not acting president. --Panam2014 (talk) 18:33, 13 January 2019 (UTC)