User talk:Mark1tex

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Stop hand nuvola.svg This is your only warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of fatal bear attacks in North America, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --CutOffTies (talk) 01:47, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Mark1tex! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking Insert-signature.png if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:14, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

November 2010[edit]

Stop x nuvola with clock.svg
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mifter (talk) 02:00, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Artículo bueno.svg

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Please be more careful with your edits in the future.

Request handled by: Stephen

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Checking with blocking admin. --Stephen 02:49, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Non-Admin Comment: Yep, there was inappropriate content, but it wasn't in the article anymore. Yet, this user felt it necessary to insert the offending content back in the article. And it just happened to occur soon after the IP inserted the original vandalism. --CutOffTies (talk) 02:59, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
In my Thursday morning WP:AGF mode, to me it appears that the editor was making a complaint that information was there, and contrary to policy that he was unaware of, he reinserted it to highlight his point. If nothing else, you now have a whack of reading at the top of this page that you will need to understand as you move forward (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:14, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Indeed. I'd be happy to unblock per AGF if you can show that you know what to do if you see this happen again. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 13:21, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

This seems to be an honest, albeit ill-informed, mistake. I have contacted the blocking admin, but will be prepared to unblock (unless said admin objects) on your agreement carefully to read the instructions contained in the "getting started" template above to avoid this happening again. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:46, 11 November 2010 (UTC)