Email this user
This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.

User talk:MelbourneStar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Alt text
usercontribscountemaillogspage moves


Happy New Year![edit]

Fuochi d'artificio.gif

Dear MelbourneStar,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--FWiW Bzuk (talk)

This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").

THANK YOU[edit]

Thank you for your kindness to me and I apologise I destroyed the article of Louis Tomlinson.I'm curious why they erase the article of Louis that HE WILL HAVE A BABY WITH BRIANA JUNGWIRTH?Chandelia16 (talk) 02:49, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstar of Humour Hires.png The Barnstar of Good Humor
Thank You For You Kindness To Me And All Of The Users!!! Chandelia16 (talk) 08:42, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Talk page vandalism[edit]

Your recent reversion of my edit was an example of a talk page guideline violation. If you do not like when people notice you engaging in meat puppetry then perhaps it would be better for you to simply refrain from engaging in meat puppetry rather than deleting comments on your behavior? Chrononem  12:17, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

You mislabelling edits as vandalism, and accusing editors of meat-puppetry (without evidence) is something that if done plenty of times, could land you in hot water. The very next time you do this, I'll be taking this issue to WP:ANI quick smart. Regards, —MelbourneStartalk 12:29, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
I feel like you have more to worry about by posting yourself on the WP:ANI than I possibly could. Especially if they review your POV edits on the varrious HRC related pages. As always, the best way to stop people from calling out your misbehavior is to stop misbehaving. Chrononem  12:47, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
I think my edits, and the way I have handled myself in such situation speaks for itself. Hence, I have taken your conduct to ANI. All the best, —MelbourneStartalk 13:43, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
I definitely think you have done the right thing here. The folks at WP:ANI will take a dim view of Chrononem's disruptive behavior. -- Scjessey (talk) 16:11, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Thanks @Scjessey: Good on you for closing the non-constructive discussion in the first place Face-smile.svg. I can see Chrononem has been blocked by Swarm for incivility, personal attacks, edit warring and disruptive editing for a week. Hopefully, should they return, they are ready to contribute to discussions constructively, exercising some due dilligence. Best, —MelbourneStartalk 08:16, 4 August 2015 (UTC)