This user helped "Julia Gillard" become a good article on 21 May 2016.
This user has autopatrolled rights on the English Wikipedia.
Email this user
This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.

User talk:MelbourneStar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:MelbourneStar1)
Jump to: navigation, search


Alt text
usercontribscountemaillogspage moves

Stop hogging all the vandal edits for yourself![edit]

Seriously, I can't get one good vandal edit without you coming in and taking them away from me. :P Your Anti-Vandal game is on fire today. CyanoTex (talk) 14:01, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Sorry @CyanoTex: -- could not help myself! ;) I'll probably take a step back for now, and let someone else step in. Kind regards, —MelbourneStartalk 14:11, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

As you can imagine, I'm new to editing Wikipedia. I appreciate the helpful links. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.39.203.128 (talk) 15:03, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

@73.39.203.128: welcome!
I hope they help. Also, please don't forget to use edit summaries -- that will explain to editors your [wonderful] edits! Kind regards, —MelbourneStartalk 15:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Blindspot[edit]

Hi,

I received your message about the alternative title for an episode of Blindspot. My apologies for not including my source.

Here is the link : http://www.tvshowtime.com/show/295647/episode/5736184/comment/4543859?ref=3a776fa6062765d2490be62865a249e4/

Sorry again,

Sincerely Lucas — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.56.10.73 (talk) 09:33, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

@81.56.10.73: That's alright Lucas!
Please ensure you add said source next time you edit. Kind regards, —MelbourneStartalk 11:01, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

melissa Breen's page[edit]

I was a bit disappointed to have you censor the changes I made to her page. I feel my inserts were appropriate as they were informative as to her progress over the years. Mentioning weakenesses as such don't equate to hate mail. What it does is simply provide more than just basic information so that the article could mean so much more to people (i.e. most) who don't follow track more than for every Olympic Games or so. Anyway, your call. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.106.25.70 (talk) 07:17, 24 September 2016 (UTC)