User talk:Melonkelon/Archive 2

"mid-1870s"

Hi Melonkelon - I note you amended the new article I wrote on Bendigo, New Zealand, fixing the accidental double "the" (thanks), but also replacing "mid 1870s" with "mid-1870s". In New Zealand English (and, to a lesser extent, in Commonwealth English overall), the hyphen is in general more often than not omitted, although it remains a viable option. See, for example the first sentence of this, the second paragraph of this, the first item listed here, the first paragraph of this, and the paragraph starting "During the mid 1960s" here — these references are from the New Zealand Government's official website, the National Library of New Zealand, the country's main online news source, the National Encyclopedia of New Zealand, and the official national online history archive. Theoretically, all New Zealand articles which contain "mid-" should be changed by bot to "mid ", though it is (as I said) optional, and as such that might be a waste of bot-time. Grutness...wha? 11:43, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Is that so? I have trouble remembering all the differences, so sorry about that. I'll have to keep that in mind. Melonkelon (talk) 11:51, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

'Salright - as I said, it's optional anyway, so it doesn't make much difference. Grutness...wha? 01:35, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Penis

Think you didn't mean to do this? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Wow, I didn't even notice, sorry. I'm not sure how I did that. Thanks for reverting. Melonkelon (talk) 02:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Delta (2007 album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Advertiser (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi

Could you take a look at my Rebecca Simonsson article. Any improvements are welcomed. :)--BabbaQ (talk) 23:03, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Take a look at my newly created articles Cecilia Uddén and Emma Knyckare. Cheers.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:36, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

And Kitty Jutbring while you are at it. :)--BabbaQ (talk) 21:48, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Enchanted Kingdom Contribution

Hello. I just recently read your message about my contributions to Enchanted Kingdom that did not appear constructive. I was really shocked about it for I honestly didn't know what you're talking about. So, I think you made a mistake for as long as I can remember I never did contribute anything to the page of Enchanted Kingdom.

Anyway, because of your message I decided to create an account to protect myself like the Wiki suggested.

BlueButterfly20 (talk) 15:51, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi

Take a look at Carolina Gynnings article. I rewrote it completely today is it was unsourced and badly formatted. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 20:30, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

And Linda Thelenius. Same situation as with the Gynning article. Thank you!--BabbaQ (talk) 21:17, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Could you take a look at Eva Rydberg, Sussie Eriksson and Kvitt eller dubbelt. Thank you!--BabbaQ (talk) 21:44, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abner Louima, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Tina Arena pic

I would just like to ask as to why did you have to revert to the previous Tina Arena image when in fact I have mentioned the copyright owner and indicated the rationale of its use? Just asking because the photo I uploaded is current and in fact more visualizing. Would you be kind enough to tell me how to post that photo again without being deleted or reverted? Thank you.

Derrick — Preceding unsigned comment added by DerrickGavinLam (talk • contribs) 11:19, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Lars-Inge

I have created articles on Mille Markovic and Lars-Inge Svartenbrandt. Some crime basically. Take a look.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:39, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

I have created an article about Lexbase.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:59, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Reed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Evening News (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Enbridge may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{cite web

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:22, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Matt Ritter may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | birth_place = [[Nicolaus, California]], [U.S.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:56, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi, Thank you for the the three thanks you've given me. L1975p (talk) 11:50, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Ann

Could you please take a look at Ann Heberleins article that I created a few days ago. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:19, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Question

Hi, Melonkelon:

Kindly explain why you deleted my contribution to the Korean Martial Arts page. I'm trying to keep the page neutral and sensitive to its historical context.

Regards,

Ohm (username) May 19, 2014 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohmfamily (talk • contribs) 01:58, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Ohmfamily: I'm not Melomkelon, but your edits removed (blanked) content and removed references. Although you fixed a typo, I would assume Melonkelon was reverting your edit, then planning afterwards to fix the typo himself. Just an observation. Acalycine^{(talk/contribs)} 13:49, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Politics

Please take a look at Soraya Post, Kristina Winberg and Peter Lundgren (politician). Thank you :)--BabbaQ (talk) 21:58, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

And Almstriden :).--BabbaQ (talk) 11:25, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Gynning

Please take a look at the Carolina Gynning article when you got time for it! Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:53, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bruce Jenner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page McFarland. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lil' Kim may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:04, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

If you want a greater than sign and not have it be interpreted as markup you just use > which gives you: > Chillum 07:59, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

I did not add the greater than signs, but thanks for the info. Melonkelon (talk) 09:23, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jack Joseph Osbourne

Hello Melonkelon,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jack Joseph Osbourne for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Steve Lux, Jr. (talk) 00:36, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Redundant hatnote?

For this edit (and others like it with the same shared name), why is the hatnote redundant? Alansohn (talk) 13:59, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

I applied WP:NAMB in this instance, because all of these articles have distinct names and would not be confused with each other, and Washington Township, New Jersey redirects to the disambiguation page. But at the same time, I think the hatnote could be useful as all of these townships share the same name and are all in the same state, so I'm somewhat conflicted. Feel free to revert. Thanks, Melonkelon (talk) 22:10, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Cunnilingus

You reverted an emendation that I made under "General Practices" because "I'm not sure this information is relevant to the article". I'd like to explain why I believe it is relevant and ask for your approval to restore it. The preceding sentence says that "personal hygiene" in that area is important, because if not followed, the giving partner may find the results (odors, sweat, micro-residue) unpleasant. My addition - and I went to quite some trouble in adding documentation from legitimate sources - is intended to show that the preceding sentence is not completely correct. The existence of the used panties trade shows that those things that personal hygiene would remove are in fact of considerable value to some (economic value, even). The many men who purchase used panties (and in most cases, the dirtier the better, which I could have documented but didn't) demonstrate through their behavior that the hygiene, to them, is not only unimportant but undesirable. There are no statistics that I know of that would establish how many men this is true of, but the size and vigor of the panty-selling industry indicates that this is not a fringe belief or behavior. (I almost put that if you put "buy dirty panties" into Google, there are 1,000,000 results. I stopped looking at the results after the first 10 pages.) So I think I was making a legitimate point which is relevant to the preceding sentence and takes issue with it. Therefore I would like your permission to restore the deletion. deisenbe (talk) 10:45, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Everything you have said is true, but I'm not sure I see the relevance in the context of cunnilingus. Why is it relevant? Melonkelon (talk) 11:15, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

First, the starting point is the assumption that the opening sentence of the paragraph is relevant in this context, that women may consider personal hygiene important, because if not, various items may be unpleasant for the giving party.

If this statement is relevant, then it is relevant to take issue with the statement. Is your point that I'm not taking issue with it, but talking about another matter altogether? My intent was to illustrate that the items in question may NOT be unpleasant for the giving party, using as supporting evidence that some men pay for the presence (transmitted to panties) of the very same items that the feminine hygiene was going to eliminate.

Rereading it, it might be more clearly worded by saying:

However, the vigorous trade in soiled panties -- in Japan, they were sold for years in vending machines - shows that some men do not find poor hygiene in this area objectionable.

Does this make the relevance clear? deisenbe (talk) 16:07, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

I understand your point, but I'm still not sure if it should be included. I'd like to move this discussion to the cunnilingus talk page and see what other people think. Melonkelon (talk) 21:33, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

I have copied this discussion to the talk page. Melonkelon (talk) 21:41, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Faith Hill may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |"[[Like We Never Loved at All]]" {{small|(feat. Tim McGraw]])}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:38, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heather Holley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mercedes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Daniel Davis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• aux Folles (musical)|La Cage Aux Folles]]'' with [[Gary Beach]] from November 2004 to March 2005. (Reportedly, he clashed frequently with Beach and others. He was eventually replaced by [[Robert

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:52, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MTV Year End Countdowns, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Goin' Crazy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andy Bull, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kings Canyon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Rakuen (album)

I renamed the article back to what it was. I added template in redirect page, so moving the article will be impossible without requesting a move. --George Ho (talk) 07:06, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Needs new image

I'm not too good at uploading images and using flickr. I was wondering if you could find an image to use in Drake Bell, Drake Bell discography, and Meghan Trainor. Thanks! -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 07:04, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi @Joseph Prasad:, unfortunately I couldn't find anything for Meghan. I found six of Drake performing, maybe not the best quality and they are also from 2007, but they could be used. Have a look here: Commons category. Thanks, Melonkelon (talk) 08:08, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Ok, @Melonkelon:. Those probably can't be used, but Thanks anyway! It's just annoying when some wiki page has a pic from 2013 that someone thinks need an update. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 08:14, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

@Joseph Prasad:, no problem. Thanks, Melonkelon (talk) 08:18, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Meghan Trainor discography dispute

Can you comment on the dispute about the separating a chart so the bubbling singles are shown as well, at Talk:Meghan Trainor discography -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 08:45, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014

Dear Melonkelon,thank you for your solution on Iggy Azalea's talk page, I really appreciate it. I was wondering if you could do the same thing with Ariana Grande. You don't have to do it if you don't want to. Thank You, JoyUnity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joyunity (talk • contribs)

Hi @JoyUnity:, I have moved your comment to my talk page. Unfortunately I couldn't find any new images for Ariana. But, you may also want to talk a look at the images currently on Commons. Have a look here. Thanks, Melonkelon (talk) 21:58, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

I don't see why that one needs a new image anyway. It's fine. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 01:45, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

I don't think anytings wrong with the image that is presented on her page, it's just that some of her photos are repeated on different parts of her page. And I want to fix that User:JoyUnity — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joyunity (talk • contribs) 05:18, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Eric Diesel

Hi Melonkelon. Regarding Eric Diesel, would you have any objection to me added back the sections now that the Road Grading subsection is back in there (as it was a part of his Career section, before Eric's current IP removed it)? So the article would look like this, less the External Links section and the Infobox. Bromley86 (talk) 18:48, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi Bromley86, feel free to add them back. I only removed them because the article was really short after the road grading section was removed. Thanks, Melonkelon (talk) 01:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Cheers Melonkelon. Bromley86 (talk) 09:45, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015

Hi Melonkelen I just would like to know how do you edit pages that are protected vandalism — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tough Critic1126 (talk • contribs) 23:05, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi Tough Critic1126. What do you mean? Are you talking about protected pages? Melonkelon (talk) 23:12, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Sia (musician)#Requested move 4

I invite you to an ongoing move request; you were involved in one of previous discussions. --George Ho (talk) 01:46, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shaynna Blaze, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jazz singer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Cashmere Cat

On the Cashmere Cat article, I just wanted to let you know that I didn't remove the bold from his name. The previous edition of the article had the name in italics, which I removed (and subsequently forgot to add the bold). Just wanted to clear that up. --Bathes (talk) 23:22, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Yes, sorry about that. I should have checked more clearly. I noticed it as soon as I undid your edit. Melonkelon (talk) 23:33, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

No worries. --Bathes (talk) 14:32, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

My recent changes to Christopher Lee's page

i got the wrong date on there and made a mistake. you removed the entire section regarding his death in the personal life section of his page. the info that was on there before my edit was correct. my bad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZOMGITSABEAR (talk • contribs) 12:02, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mary Millar in Phantom of the Opera.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mary Millar in Phantom of the Opera.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 13:13, 21 June 2015 (UTC)