User talk:Mendaliv

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Vandalism
Level 4

TWL Questia check-in[edit]

Hello!

You are receiving this message because The Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to Questia. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

  • Make sure that you can still log in to your Questia account; if you are having trouble feel free to get in touch.
  • When your account expires you can reapply for access at WP:Questia.
  • Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
  • Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, email us and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services The Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thanks! Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of National Names 2000 10:46, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Adam Matthew account check-in[edit]

Hello Mendaliv,

You are receiving this message because you have a one-year subscription to Adam Matthew through the Wikipedia Library. This is a brief update, to remind you about that access:

  • Please make sure that you can still log in to your Adam Matthew account. If you are having trouble let me know.
  • Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, to include citations with links on Wikipedia. Links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed.
  • Do you write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let me know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate it if you filled out this short survey. Your input will help us to facilitate this particular partnership, and to discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thank you, Wikipedia Library Adam Matthew account coordinator HazelAB (talk) 13:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Oppose at Talk:US RfC[edit]

Interesting dismissive comment at your Oppose for the lede sentence RfC at United States. The reasoning "insufficient prominence to the ambiguity" is actually better than the notation itself. It would be instructive if you were to share what the American Jurisprudence Encyclopedia uses to define the geographic extent of the US in an RfC Comment.

American Jurisprudence is a tertiary reference, inferior by WP policy wp:psts to both primary sources and the six scholarly sources published in US and Canadian reliable sources.

I would appreciate your reconsidering the discussion and sources available for reference at Talk:United States#Mediation update Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/United States. Thanks for any additional time on this matter. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 12:40, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

No thanks. I've said my piece, and I'm not about to let you drag me into your battlefield. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 16:07, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Elijay redirect page[edit]

Tell you what -- let's see how the pageview numbers come in on the L.E.J article and also let's look at the pageview numbers for the Elijay redirect page. If pageview tallies start to shoot up, almost certainly it is not folks looking for a river or city in Georgia, but fans wanting to learn more about this hot French trio, and then we should change the redirect accordingly. Another option: turning Elijay into a disambiguation page, with links to the river, the city, and the French trio.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:27, 8 August 2015 (UTC)