User talk:Metaclock

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


January 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Potato chip has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Potato chip was changed by Metaclock (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853805 on 2014-01-11T19:59:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:59, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lipoic acid. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lipoic acid was changed by Metaclock (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.903247 on 2014-01-13T02:51:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:51, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Gates, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Robert Gates was changed by Metaclock (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.896123 on 2014-01-13T03:08:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:09, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

April 2014[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Jill Kelley, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. v/r - TP 04:18, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, Metaclock. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Jill Kelley, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. v/r - TP 19:47, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

  • I agree with TParis that your account is used almost exclusively to promote one single person and I have blocked it accordingly. Drmies (talk) 20:34, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Drmies (talk) 20:35, 13 October 2014 (UTC)