User talk:Metropolitan90

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Administrators' newsletter – August 2017[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017).

ANEWSicon.png

Administrator changes

added AnarchyteGeneralizationsAreBadCullen328 (first RfA to reach WP:300)
removed CpromptRockpocketRambo's RevengeAnimumTexasAndroidChuck SMITHMikeLynchCrazytalesAd Orientem

Guideline and policy news

Technical news


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

RE:[edit]

A question. Why do you warn me, when I only intervened twice and very briefly? Google traslate --Jcfidy (talk) 18:51, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

(Refiriéndose a Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colección Patricia Phelps de Cisneros/Publication list.) Sólo era un consejo. Si yo fuera a es:Wikipedia:Consultas de borrado y les pidiera el borrado de un artículo de la Wikipedia en español, pero dando mis razones solamente en inglés, algunos lectores no me entenderían. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:33, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of Katharine Gorka[edit]

Could you please explain why you deleted this article? It was marked as G4, but I contested that on the talk page for multiple reasons. First, the nominator, User:Randykitty, said it had the same sources as the original article. This was a false claim, because two of the six sources (at the time) were news reports from yesterday. Second, I pointed out (twice) that the previous page was deleted because of a COI on the part of its creator and a lack of coverage of the subject independent of her husband. Neither was true this time. Aside from Randykitty response that the sources were not new, none of my points were ever addressed. I strongly believe this was a bad CSD tag, and a bad delete. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:35, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

In general, if someone is going to re-create an article that was deleted via AFD (especially a recent one) as this was, the article has to unambiguously establish that the reason it was deleted no longer exists. I don't have access to the original text, but adding a couple of sources, probably isn't going to pass that test. I suspect that the subject of this article may be worthy of an article about her at some point but it looks like this is a case of WP:TOOSOON. Toddst1 (talk) 13:16, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Argento: The main factor in my decision to delete the article under WP:CSD#G4 was that Katharine Gorka was considered non-notable at the AfD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katharine Gorka) just last month and it seemed unlikely that the situation had changed significantly in the short time since then. However, you can take the article to Wikipedia:Deletion review if you prefer. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 13:22, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
I don't believe a review is needed - if it had gone through AfD again I'm not sure 100% I would have voted keep myself. That's why I only contested the CSD instead of removing it. I was just frustrated that everyone seemed to assume the situation hadn't changed and didn't acknowledge the points I raised.
Would you please restore the material to my sandbox so I can merge the relevant information to Sebastian Gorka? Argento Surfer (talk) 13:36, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Seconding restoration to sandbox and complete preservation to entire history--Wikipietime (talk) 13:55, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

If the history's important, it may be easier to restore the article and I'll merge/redirect it to Sebastian. Argento Surfer (talk) 14:11, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
It was deleted after an AfD, so restoring the complete history is akin to undoing the AfD. It would be more appropriate to copy just the sources that were used (such as they were, some were only rather irrelevant in-passing mentions), for possible inclusion in the article on her husband. --Randykitty (talk) 14:33, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
This history was not deleted after an AfD. But I don't care about that - I just don't want to dig through the sources again. I'd rather save time and prune from the work I did yesterday, whether it be through my sandbox or a restored article. Argento Surfer (talk) 14:45, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Okay, I've moved the article to User:Argento Surfer/Katharine Gorka so you can work on it. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:18, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Thanks! Argento Surfer (talk) 16:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

I am not convinced that he, Sebastian Gorka, should not be mentioned on an article of Katharine Gorka. There may be some chauvinistic basis at play that he is the most worthy. After all, she apparently has the family connection and was a US citizen; whereas, he immigrated and I assume became a citizen via marriage. May very well have it reversed. ( for listening enjoyment! https://wiki2.org/en/Katharine_Gorka )--Wikipietime (talk) 19:46, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

  • Is that a double negative -- that is, do you mean that Sebastian should or should not be mentioned in the article about Katharine? But in any event, Wikipedia would normally mention a person's spouse in an article about them, and especially if the spouse is notable enough to have an article about them as well. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:26, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2017[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017).

ANEWSicon.png

Administrator changes

added NakonScott
removed SverdrupThespianElockidJames086FfirehorseCelestianpowerBoing! said Zebedee

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • You will now get a notification when someone tries to log in to your account and fails. If they try from a device that has logged into your account before, you will be notified after five failed attempts. You can also set in your preferences to get an email when someone logs in to your account from a new device or IP address, which may be encouraged for admins and accounts with sensitive permissions.
  • Syntax highlighting is now available as a beta feature (more info). This may assist administrators and template editors when dealing with intricate syntax of high-risk templates and system messages.
  • In your notification preferences, you can now block specific users from pinging you. This functionality will soon be available for Special:EmailUser as well.

Arbitration

  • Applications for CheckUser and Oversight are being accepted by the Arbitration Committee until September 12. Community discussion of the candidates will begin on September 18.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to Admin confidence survey[edit]

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)