User talk:Michaelidarecis

Welcome...

Hello, Michaelidarecis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! _{Wiki11790 talk} 20:54, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Temple Mount, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 15:49, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Michaelidarecis. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 20:00, 31 May 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:48, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:07, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 22:23, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Michael, I saw your discussion in Malik Shabazz page. Please understand that when you are joining some community, you have to follow the rules accepted by the community. It is so not only for wikipedia. Before you get yourself into trouble here, I am strongly advising you to read the following fundamental rules of wikipedia: WP:NOR, WP:CITE, WP:VER. Also it would be helpful for you to know What Wikipedia is Not -M.Altenmann >t 23:27, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi M. Altenmann appreciate your comments and do understand about rules. My issue with this malik shabazz fellow is that he is a hypocrite since had pointed out other parts of the web pages in question that had no business there. There were no citations. This is about The Bible and again it isn't about a date per say when Malcom X was shot which is a known fact. It is about the revelation of God as He reveals the hidden truth in our day. That revelation of Truth that is being excluded because of some editor's personal views. Don't worry God is going to Do His Will regardless of the evil of man's will. This was unprofessional on his part since he had no knowledge whatsoever on the content that was deleted. If you are a good editor then lead the people instead of being some robot seeking to make a million edits to pat themselves on the back. Go look at my content that was deleted and read it for yourself and see the sheer power in the revelation. Then find a way for me to get that on the pages. You are all responsible for truth. That is the benchmark not process.

Praise I AM, Michael IdarecisMichaelidarecis (talk) 13:33, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:47, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]