User talk:MioAkiyama26

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:38, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, MioAkiyama26, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Baguio have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tagaytay, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:38, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Tagaytay and other PH places. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Only change climate data if you have other reliable references! P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:37, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Benguet. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:14, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Manila. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:59, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018[edit]

Stop changing climate data if you don't add reliable references. If you make changes that contradict existing references you better add new references, see WP:RS and WP:CITE. Last warning. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:50, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Manila. Last warning now! P 1 9 9 ✉ 12:50, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ mazca ^talk 18:58, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Over an extended period you have continued to edit climate data and other information without providing sources of where your updated information is coming from. You have completely failed to respond to others' concerns about this, so I've blocked you indefinitely until you respond to these concerns. I am happy for any administrator to consider unblocking you once you indicate that you understand the issues; see the instructions in the template above to appeal. ~ mazca ^talk 19:00, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]