User talk:Mo ainm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Hello, now be nice and see below.

Please place new messages at the bottom of this page. I will respond to comments here, unless there's a better place for them. Please read the following helpful hints, as well as our talk page guidelines before posting:

  • I am not an administrator. That means I cannot block, unblock, delete, undelete, protect or unprotect. You can report vandalism here and suspicious usernames here. Go here if you want something deleted.
  • I reserve the right to remove inappropriate comments. This includes vandalism and trolling. I also reserve the right to refactor ugly HTML, or to trim unnecessary stuff (e.g. to Article).
  • If you're here to inform me of a mistake I made while on recent changes patrol, please indicate which article is concerned by enclosing the title of the article in two sets of square brackets: [[example article]]. If you're an IP and got reverted for deleting text, make sure you use an edit summary next time.


Joulé is of notable status for example, such references as businesswire (notable and directly mentions Joule as a attendee of njBIO), NJBIZ( notable) and New Jersey Business Magazine (largest business magazine in the state of New Jersey, has a page on Wiki) Thank you and if you would like to give me feedback, please let me know :)

Bobby Sands[edit]

(Moved to Talk:Bobby Sands)

Northern Ireland flags issue is covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:TROUBLES[edit]

Commons-emblem-notice.svg This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding The Troubles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Please be reminded that articles about the Northern Ireland flag come under WP:1RR. A complaint about the flag issue was recently filed at WP:AN3. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:34, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

I was aware of the sanctions. Mo ainm~Talk 12:41, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Quick correction[edit]

Actually I was saying even if Rms had been reverting *in their opinion* vandalism. By the definition of WP:Vandalism it isnt vandalism and so not justified in breaking 1rr - I will edit my comment to be more explicit. Only in death does duty end (talk) 12:24, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

But you still want closure and warning on vandalism when vandalism is not the issue. And an editor who is here since 2005 really should know what vandalism is. Mo ainm~Talk 12:43, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
In the last few days I have seen an editor here ten years who genuinely has no idea what qualifies as a reliable secondary source and one who thinks BLP's can be entirely primary-sourced... I'm willing to extend good faith in that they have an incomplete understanding of policy. Otherwise its mountain-molehill time. Only in death does duty end (talk) 12:57, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Unfortunately competency is not a requirement to edit here, but an editor who was previously on a 0RR on an article involved in the Troubles arb case then goes on to breach the very strict 1RR with no explanation why they are doing it. Mo ainm~Talk 13:02, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Ah I didnt spot they previously had a 0rr. Only in death does duty end (talk) 13:09, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Flexible Stone[edit]

Hello, Mo ainm!

We have fixed all the information about Flexible Stone. Could you please check if it looks okay now? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamilona (talkcontribs) 22:53, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

An admin will be along shortly to make a decision on the article. It still in my opinion reads like an advertisement but I wont be the one making the final decision. Mo ainm~Talk 22:56, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Mo ainm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)