User talk:Moreau1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! If you need help or just want to say hello, click here and leave a message! [1] -- Phgao 05:16, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

McMillan Reservoir on NRHP list?[edit]

Hi ... I've updating the NRHP lists and see that you added McMillan Reservoir to the District of Columbia list. However, I can't find anything that says this site is on the list. I looked for it using the search features on the [www.nr.nps.gov National Park Service website] and also ran a Google search. Can you give a citation for this? Thanks. --Sanfranman59 (talk) 19:16, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

It appears that McMillan was designated as a historic landmark by the DC government, but has not been added to the NRHP.
OK. Then I'm going to remove it from the DC NRHP list here. Thanks --Sanfranman59 (talk) 05:42, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

BMP[edit]

I suspect you are part of a student project. Please come clean and declare yourselves at Wikipedia:School and university projects. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 07:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm not a student & not part of any project. Moreau1 (talk) 15:10, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Federal Water Quality Association[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Federal Water Quality Association, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bongomatic (talk) 01:31, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


I am suggesting that I be allowed to create a page on the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF). It saw that another user tried to create this article but it has been rerouted. Its sister program the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) has its own page. The Drinking Water State Revolving Fund has received $2 billion under ARRA 2009 and much attention has been placed on this program. I find it important to create a page that is informational for those wanting to know more about the construction or repair of drinking water infrastructure here in the United States and Puerto Rico. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueRoyal1974 (talkcontribs) 14:24, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

DYK for WEPS[edit]

Updated DYK query On 17 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article WEPS, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 11:03, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Environmental monitoring[edit]

Totally agree with your comments - I have ended up writing just about all the article but my background is rivers and lakes. If you can add air, ground, sea etc. please do so. You are also right that soon it may have to spawn off daughter articles leaving short summaries on the main page. Before we do that however, it would be good to get at least all the heading and short paragraphs present.  Velela  Velela Talk   08:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Culverts[edit]

Hello. It seems to me, to you is what to tell about Culverts. Help us to develop the correct point of view.--Andrey! 16:11, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Stream Update[edit]

Thanks for the updates and references on Stream. SBaker43 (talk) 20:43, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Silt fence[edit]

Thank you for adding the copypaste tag (and providing the source too!) on that article. I have confirmed that some of the content added by Fireandwater33 was a copyright violation. So I have removed the content from the source mentioned and also, the template appropriately. Minimac (talk) 13:15, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Regulation of ship pollution in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Research Council (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Deadlink?[edit]

Re this edit: the google books link you tagged as deadlink links fine for me. Is there anything I should know? Staszek Lem (talk) 16:55, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Water pollution[edit]

I guess it's that time of night !  Velella  Velella Talk   22:04, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Sedimentation[edit]

I invite your comments in a discussion of organization of Wikipedia coverage of water treatment sedimentation at Talk:Sedimentation (water treatment).Thewellman (talk) 16:08, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

February 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bacteriological water analysis may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • in which serial dilutions of the sample are vacuum filtered through purpose made ppmembrane filter]]s and these filters are themselves laid on nutrient medium within sealed plates.<ref>EPA (2002). [

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drinking water quality in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mercury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Public water system, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sewer overflow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Drug pollution[edit]

Dear Moreau1, Actually, it is on topic. Your reaction, that Milorganite is fertilizer is correct. However, the pharmaceutical and personal care waste stream has a very real impact on the down stream products, and is interrelated to it. I don't want to get into an edit war over relevancy, as I tend to view that as being in the eyes of the beholder. However, the readers of wikipedia could better make that decision on their own, and may not know of that facet of the problem, if it isn't in this article. The reference to the problem are in the Milorganite article (perhaps you missed that). So I am asking you to reconsider. 10:47, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you![edit]

Kitten (06) by Ron.jpg

You erased a link to Alexandra Dunn.

Bearian (talk) 13:35, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aqueducts on the C&O Canal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mosby's Raiders. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Industrial wastewater treatment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mercury. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clean Air Act. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Moreau1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

February 2017[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Environmental impact of aviation. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:37, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Stormwater into Industrial stormwater. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

I am the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. Moreau1 (talk) 00:57, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Your addition to Early Amatuer Radio Teletype History[edit]

The addition of the partial sentence, "...Surplus equipment distributed by US government and military agencies provided other models available to radio amateurs, including Teletype Models 14, 15, and 28..." in the 1940's part of this paragraph is incorrect. Teletype Model 28 equipment was not distributed to Amateur Radio operators until the late 1960s. As such, while correct as a partial stand-alone sentence, the placement is factually incorrect from a timeline perspective. Wa3frp (talk) 13:31, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

It sure looks to me[edit]

that your renaming the Department of Labor building the William Jefferson Clinton Federal Building is way wrong. Please take a look at it and fix it. Carptrash (talk) 03:29, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

What a mess. Well it seems to me that you are being as conscientious as is possible trying to sort it out. With the recent cutbacks in the US Federal government I doubt that updating web sites is much of a priority. Carptrash (talk) 16:40, 22 August 2017 (UTC)