User talk:Morel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Hello, Morel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Studia Humaniora Tartuensia, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Abductive (reasoning) 12:43, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Studia Humaniora Tartuensia[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Studia Humaniora Tartuensia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Studia Humaniora Tartuensianews, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 12:43, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category talk:Flemish Classical scholars[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category talk:Flemish Classical scholars, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

See talk page comment!!

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:22, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

My reversion[edit]

Thanks for reverting that. I was trying to do it myself but I was on the fifth captcha. (talk) 00:37, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome!--Morel (talk) 21:41, 7 March 2012 (UTC)


Wikipedia Rollbacker.svg

I have granted rollback rights to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:20, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, I will certainly use these rights for reverting vandalism only.--Morel (talk) 16:10, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

I just wanted to say thanks for the quick reverts of the vandalism on my talk page. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:16, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome!--Morel (talk) 21:41, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Trade in the Mayan civilization[edit]

Per your request in the edit summary here [1] I restored back to here[2] Hoping this is the correct version. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:25, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much!--Morel (talk) 18:31, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Merkin edits[edit]

Hello, I took the liberty of tagging User talk:69annieapple69 with a level 3 joke warning for their Merkin edits. Have a good day.Trilobitealive (talk) 03:12, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

This is the page where joke warning templates are found if you need them: Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace. Trilobitealive (talk) 03:14, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! I will try to use them when necessary.--Morel (talk) 10:10, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Wim Crusio[edit]

Hi, I wonder why you self-reverted there. Talk pages are specifically not intended to vent one's opinion about the subject of an article (see WP:TALK), let alone this kind of attacks. Just curious. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 17:04, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I must have been lost for a moment. It's probably because I usually try to avoid reverting user talk pages unless I see obvious vandalism. I now see that this comment may have been reverted.--Morel (talk) 17:07, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
  • It's not a user talk page, but an article talk page, being attacked by an IP troll. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 17:12, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Yes, sorry, my fault.--Morel (talk) 17:14, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
No prob. :-) --Guillaume2303 (talk) 17:15, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ministry of Magic. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 23:31, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

An anonymous user repeatedly included the sentence "They rape her and she is later rescued by Dumbledore." Although "supported" by two citations ([3] and [4]), I consider this as vandalism, as it presents an interpretation of the situation, and no rape is mentioned in the text.--Morel (talk) 00:54, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Studia Humaniora Tartuensia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Studia Humaniora Tartuensia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Studia Humaniora Tartuensia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 16:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)