User talk:Mosesben

Policies[edit]

Hi,

I have noticed taht a few of your edits appear to be including personal attacks and other issues that may not be beneficial towards Wikipedia as an encyclopedia.

When making edits you need to be aware that you should remain civil and refrain from personal attacks as you did here[1].

When adding informationt to articles there are guidelines for styles of writing that should be followed such as not having blocks of caital letters. These guidelines can be found here.

If you need any hep movign forward feel free to drop me a message on my talk page. Amortias (T)(C) 12:13, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014[edit]

Your recent editing history at B. R. Ambedkar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Acroterion (talk) 14:21, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attack[edit]

Hi Mosesbem. I'm surprised that you perceive my reply as a personal attack; that's not how it is intended. Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 14:58, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 17:44, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mosesben (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello I am not a Sock Puppet. I have been editing from my Ip previously and that also months ago. And you haven't mentioned of whose Sock Puppet I am User:Bbb23. Unbblock me please. I request you. Mosesben (talk) 18:21, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You give appear to have forgotten what a sockpuppet is, somewhere between this edit and your next one. The evidence is very convincing, and your denial less so. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 13:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your block log and your user page identify the master.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:33, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I didn't get you what were saying as I don't know many things? Please tell me in detail. User:Bbb23 tell me and Unblock me kindly.

I can't follow you, but if you're saying you don't understand what I said, the name of the sock master is User:Siddheart.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:51, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Bbb23 what do you mean by master, Unblock me kindly. Why have you blcoked me? Is it because I made some changes on wikipedia? What is Sock Puppet? Tell me please. I request you. I don't know Siddheart. Mosesben (talk) 09:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mosesben (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I looked out for the meaning of sock earlier and I found out over here >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sock. I thought someone was abusing me. Then I found that Sock Puppet from here. I seriously didn;t know what it was. Please unblock me now.Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please . I apologize.Mosesben(talk) 17:31, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As much as I hate it when people beg, I will tell you that you need to either make that request from your master account (Siddheart) or, if you wish to use this account and this account only, clearly state as such in your request. You will also need to disclose all accounts you created, regardless of whether you used them or we know about them. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:31, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mosesben (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear, Seriously, I am not a Sock Puppet of Siddheart. He is innocent. I was having a watch on the page so that's why I knew what was the Editing sequence. I will only use this account from now onwards. Previously I was editing from Ip Addresses. But Siddheart is not to be blamed. Will you unblock me now? This is my 4th request. Mosesben (talk) 09:06, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Decline per WP:DUCK. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:04, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mosesben (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Whatever happened is unfortunate. I adorably ask for forgiveness. Please unblock me kindly. Mosesben (talk) 08:57, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You can make a full and frank admission. Or you can stay blocked. Your choice.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:51, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mosesben (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am going to use this Id for my future edits. I have been making several requests after my block. Please tell me what else I have to state in writing other than this. I also plead for forgiveness in my above request. I am also taking oath today that I will use this Id only. Even if still to get unblocked I have to state any other thing then please tell me. Please Unblock me. This is my 6TH REQUEST. Is there any other thing to get unblocked? I have clearly stated each and everything. Thanks. Mosesben (talk) 10:30, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is a sock account, and won't be unblocked. If you want to make another unblock request, use your main account. PhilKnight (talk) 21:53, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You admit to being a sock (although at first you denied it). You say you want to use this account. Sock accounts normally are never unblocked. Sometimes master accounts are unblocked. I'm going to allow your last unblock request to remain, but I'm revoking access to this page. If you want to discuss your block, log in to your main account and use that talk page, not this one.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:35, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]