User talk:Moxy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Master Editor IV
Editorrib17.png
Animated-Flag-Canada.gif
Hello!!
'
Click here to post a message to me
'


Qxz-ad163.gif

More about me: See here
Noia 64 apps karm.svg This user has been on Wikipedia for 11 years, 7 months and 21 days.
Nohat-logo-XI-big-text.png Moxy is one of the most active Wikipedians on English Wikipedia.
Editor - orichalcum star.jpg This editor is a Master Editor IV
and is entitled to display this
Orichalcum Editor Star.
Wikipedia-logo.png This user has made over
65,000 edits on Wikipedia.
Namespace Wikipedia.1.svg This user is not an administrator and has no desire to be one.
Crystal Clear app clock.svg It is approximately 10:48 PM where this user lives.

About becoming an administrator[edit]

Wikipedia needs you! Take the poll.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia so far; they are very much appreciated. Your experience and tenure have been an asset to the project.

I know you ran for adminship a long time ago. Would you consider running again? If you would like to find out about your chances of a successful RfA, please visit:

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll

Thank you!

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:08, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

User:Anna Frodesiak.....thank you very much for the invite...but I will have to decline. As someone who now contributes alot to our policies and other admin pages I think it's best I stay above the fray of being an admin. I have been here a very very long time and think it's best if I am interpreting community consensus.... that I not be involved in daily implementation of thoses policies. I also think its best the next generation of Wikipedians police themselves. That said there are some tools I would like to use.....but not so much so that I would take on the burden of being an admin. Again thanks for thinking of me.--Moxy (talk) 03:15, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Eskimo page[edit]

Thank you for doing the latest changes. They are more or less similar to what I have been trying to make. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aldep77 (talkcontribs) 03:36, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Date ranges[edit]

Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Dates_and_numbers#Ranges you might find this helpful. Keith-264 (talk) 23:02, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

??--Moxy (talk) 00
03, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
just noticed your revert....the MOS is MOS:FORLANG. Thanks for the title link...dame automated moves.--Moxy (talk) 02:07, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Spain in the War of 1812[edit]

Spain has been included in the War of 1812 infobox since 2014, I did not put it there. The reason Spain is there is because of the Battle of Pensacola (1814). Charles lindberg (talk) 03:34, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Makes sense to me.....Pls bring that up on the talk page....got to get involved in the talks happening. Are you not getting the notices when people ping you.? --Moxy (talk) 04:05, 26 April 2017 (UTC)6

Dispute over a listing of something.[edit]

I have a question on how to dispute a claim that something on a page is supposedly true when it's only opinion and the truth is different from what is there. Escape49 (talk) 08:24, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello[edit]

Hey Moxy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Javascript132 (talkcontribs) 02:35, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi Phyo Phyo Maung (talk) 07:48, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

hi Snowipine (talk) 04:54, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

The emoji at RFCN[edit]

http://emojipedia.org/face-with-tears-of-joy/ - Mlpearc (open channel) 03:42, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

I can see them on my cell phone!!!! But is there a chart that says a square is a smile with a tear....and a triangle is whatever.--Moxy (talk) 03:46, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, that I don't know :P - Mlpearc (open channel) 03:52, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Collages[edit]

Not sure at the moment. If these photos were taken from Commons, then they need to be listed as such. File:Bentworth photo montage.jpg This is one of Bentworth, Hampshire, I did a while back; see how the photos used are identified and linked. I'll have to try looking them up at Commons; we have no other clues as to where they may be from. If the images aren't there, then it looks like they need to go to DR at Commons. We hope (talk) 23:55, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Toronto Collage, 2017.png This one is fine-all Commons files. Haven't had a chance to start looking re: the other one yet. We hope (talk) 01:31, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
File:History of Canada collage.png This one is OK too-all files at Commons. We hope (talk) 01:55, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Great work. So fascinating

Breurly Bert (talk) 02:18, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

hello, i tried to correct a data yesterday but failed- dont know how to correct it now[edit]

pierrelaurentiPierrelaurenti (talk) 21:45, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Election maps[edit]

Canada 1867 Federal Election.svg

These elections maps are significantly flawed. Someone who doesn't know the history of Canadian elections, and the Conservative and Liberal-Conservative parties, might look at this and think that they we're actually running against each other. the Lib-Cons, and Conservatives had candidates that ran under the two different names, in different ridings, however there was never a time when a Liberal-Conservative was running against a Conservative in a riding, like the map makes it seem. This is the same reason we don't list the Lib Cons and Conservative as two different parties in the infobox. Would it not make more sense for the map to match the information in the infobox? Charles lindberg (talk) 14:46, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

The Canadian federal election, 1904 election map shows the Lib-cons and Conservatives as one party, matching the information in the infobox. This is a good exemplar for the previous elections. Charles lindberg (talk) 14:56, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Agree...will work on them.--Moxy (talk) 04:23, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Numbering NS premiers[edit]

Howdy, Moxy. You're more clued in on Canadian politics then I. There's a little dispute at John Buchanan concerning whether he (and the other NS premiers) should be numbered or not. GoodDay (talk) 17:15, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

font-size on Help:Maintenance template removal[edit]

Hi there. I've boldly changed your change from font-size:120%; to font-size:110%; to font-size:larger;, which I believe may be a bit more device-neutral. I also removed the duplicate links to Template:xxx, leaving just {{tlx|xxx}}, as I don't really see the need for that duplication, and the source usage should be the most familiar to all. Shortening the box titles like that may well help with whatever you had in mind. I've looked at it in portrait mode on a not-huge Android 6 phone using Chrome, in mobile view, and I think it looks reasonable. I don't know the specific case you had in mind when you changed it, so giving you the chance to review my change. Thanks. Murph9000 (talk) 14:42, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Change works fine in mobile view.....all good.--Moxy (talk) 20:22, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

I want to know how many following step are taken to join indian navy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vivek Baba (talkcontribs) 03:11, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Isildurada[edit]

There is no doubt that it is a sockpuppet of Melroross. Same editing style, same English, same obsessive editing on Portuguese racial "purity" issues and interest in celticism. Not sure how to report. But not sure it matters. Main issue is he is a non-constructive edit warrior who does not understand wikipedia or how it functions and accuses science of having an anti-Portuguese agenda. Another wacko basically.Asilah1981 (talk) 11:57, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:April wine Rocks.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:April wine Rocks.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

wrt Star Wars[edit]

I'm laughing so much at your edit summary. Yeah, the article has gotten into a very poor state since its been promoted, and it's unfortunate. But, anyway, just wanted to know I was actually laughing ;P ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 15:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Boxes[edit]

Those boxes are not America style, it is modelled after Theresa May, and Jeremy Corbyn. Charles lindberg (talk) 23:32, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Another obvious non-American with a series is Narendra Modi. Also I didn't think there was a standard for Americans that is different than non-Americans on WP. I though it was one standard for all. Charles lindberg (talk) 23:41, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

I'm going through other major world leaders. Malcolm Turnbull has a series, as well as Tony Abbott, and Matteo Renzi. Charles lindberg (talk) 23:46, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board#New templates for politics--Moxy (talk) 00:02, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

ping requirements[edit]

Regarding this edit: note a ping won't work unless the edit includes a signature at the end. isaacl (talk) 20:05, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Shit really ? been doing it for a long time never noticed. Thank you so-much :-)--Moxy (talk) 20:10, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Yes, it's that way so simply copyediting a post won't retrigger a ping. A signature (I think at the end) is needed so the edit will be interpreted as a new post. isaacl (talk) 22:25, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

American Archaic humans[edit]

You removed the insertion of the American Archaic humans. This entry has a source: Incredible discovery places humans in California 130,000 years ago, Arstechnica There maybe doubts about the discovery and dating but this should be mentioned in Wikipedia and not dismissed out of hand. Maybe it should be placed somewhere else.Smiley.toerist (talk) 08:49, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

I now that there is some mention of it in the talk page.Smiley.toerist (talk) 08:53, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Already there

Stones described as probable tools, hammerstones and anvils, have been found in southern California, at the Cerutti Mastodon site, that are associated with a mastodon skeleton which appeared to have been processed by humans. The mastodon skeleton was dated by thorium-230/uranium radiometric analysis, using diffusion–adsorption–decay dating models, to 130.7 ± 9.4 thousand years ago.[30] No human bones were found, and the claims of tools and bone processing have been described as "not plausible".[31] Michael R. Waters commented that "To demonstrate such early occupation of the Americas requires the presence of unequivocal stone artefacts. There are no unequivocal stone tools associated with the bones... this site is likely just an interesting paleontological locality." Chris Stringer said that "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - each aspect requires the strongest scrutiny," adding that "High and concentrated forces must have been required to smash the thickest mastodon bones, and the low energy depositional environment seemingly provide

--Moxy (talk) 11:30, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion - Manakula Vinayagar Institute of Technology[edit]

Hi Moxy,

I am managing website for the Education institution called Manakula Vinayagar Institute of Technology, http://www.mvit.edu.in I created Wikipedia page for the institution and deleted twice.

Please clarify, how to avoid Speedy deletion?

Thanks & Regards Sankar Venkat

Speaker of the Legislative Assembly[edit]

Speaker of the Legislative Assembly is not a party position, no reason for it's inclusion on Ontario Liberal Party. Also there exists established consensus on the ideology of the Liberal Party of Canada that states factions like Social democracy should be excluded, per Talk:Liberal_Party_of_Canada#The_internal_ideological_factions_within_the_Liberal_Party_should_be_included:_i.e._classical_liberalism_and_social_liberalism. Medicinehatter (talk) 07:21, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Scheer[edit]

The National Post story sourced clearly states Scheer worked as a campaign organizer and member of the Reform Party before they became the Alliance in 2000, I see no reason why you would removed that. Medicinehatter (talk) 07:28, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sock puppetry just go away took us days to clean up your edits. Best find some other hobbies.--Moxy (talk) 07
25, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
An investigation might be needed before you play judge and jury. Medicinehatter (talk) 07:28, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Your right not all ducks are the same....will file a report tomorrow. ...in the mean time try not to mess up to much stuff.--Moxy (talk) 07:30, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Too* Medicinehatter (talk) 07:32, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Canada Clean-Up[edit]

Hey Moxy, thanks for that major clean-up and citation work on the Canada article. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 10:49, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

CPC Infobox Ideology[edit]

Hi, I noticed you were involved in the debate over infobox ideology in the article Conservative Party of Canada. The page is currently locked because of an edit war, and no attempt has been made on the talk page to resolve this. I would to thus invite you to contribute to the discussion at Talk:Conservative_Party_of_Canada#Ideology so the page can be unlocked and constructive editing can continue.--Jay942942 (talk) 15:35, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject Organized crime[edit]

Hello, Moxy.

You are invited to join WikiProject Organized crime, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of Organized crime topics.
Please check out the project, and if interested feel free to join by adding your name to the member list. North America1000 21:48, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you commented on[edit]

This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you commented on (2 RfCs, actually, one less than six months ago and another a year ago). The new RfC is at:

Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RfC: Allow private schools to be characterized as non-affiliated as well as religious, in infobox?

Specifically, it asks that "religion = none" be allowed in the infobox.

The first RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:

The result of that RfC was "unambiguously in favour of omitting the parameter altogether for 'none' " and despite the RfC title, additionally found that "There's no obvious reason why this would not apply to historical or fictional characters, institutions etc.", and that nonreligions listed in the religion entry should be removed when found "in any article".

The second RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:

The result of that RfC was that the "in all Wikipedia articles, without exception, nonreligions should not be listed in the Religion= parameter of the infobox.".

Note: I am informing everyone who commented on the above RfCs, whether they supported or opposed the final consensus. --Guy Macon (talk) 04:24, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

leaning from you[edit]

am kofi from africa, ghana to be precise.. am new on creating of wiki articles ..and i want to learn from you.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acyd101 (talkcontribs) 09:46, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Question[edit]

I am not sure why you removed my edits to the "Nova Scotia" article. It would be great if you could communicate what changes are needed. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickelfan (talkcontribs) 01:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

@Nickelfan: ...basically we have two problems....one your copy pasting for one article to others without proper attribution. Secondly the text that is being copy pasted is unsourced. I have added links to your page with more info.--Moxy (talk) 04:06, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

RE:[edit]

Hmmm... I added several sources when editing the article. I believe they were sources #14 through #17. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickelfan (talkcontribs) 05:12, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Special Barnstar Hires.png The Special Barnstar
Brilliant to see Canada on the main page, knowing the incredible amount of work that goes into maintaining such a huge page, and that you were instrumental in that quality assurance. Thank you! hamiltonstone (talk) 04:45, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

admin[edit]

Hi Moxy, I've sat down a couple times to go over WP:Administration. Alas, it didn't capture my interest so I will probably remain part of the silent indifferent on that one. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 12:27, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your time my friend--Moxy (talk) 07:24, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
On the question of supplement essays... you asked at my page what we should do? I answered a bit long winded. Here is the concise version. For context, this seeks to resolve apparent conflicts between templates for "Guidance essay" and "Supplement (essay)". On one hand we seem to have given these different levels of clout but on the other say they are mere essays. The following idea resolves this, and provides a clear basis for text at project namespace.
1. Create Template:SupplementalEssayShortcut {aka SES). This would be used in policies/guidelines to link to supplemental essays just like the usual shortcut templates plus would automatically add the "Supplemental essay" banner to the target essays. After a conversion period, turn off the existing Template:Supplement.
2. Convert Template:Guidance essay into Template:DraftSupplementalEssay.
Those two steps would resolve the paradox of two-tiered level of clout versus both things being "just an essay". They would chart the path towards consensus for competing ideas, help ensure that essays marked supplement meet the criteria, and helps us clearly demarcate these types of pages in lists of namespaces.
On a related nuance.... I also think the banner for supplemental essays should not say "This is an explanatory supplement..." but "This supplemental essay describes widely accepted but unenforceable community norms regarding (policy whatever)." This final change clearly communicates the nature of a supplemental (just a mere) essay and that will hopefully reduce misunderstanding and arguments about their application. In addition, this may increase interest in elevating some ideas in these essays, such as BRD, to a guideline or policy.
Your critique of these ideas is invited, before I try to float it for real
NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 11:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
I am sorry but I dont really understand what your saying.--Moxy (talk) 17:57, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
As we're discussing another approach at my page, just forget I said anything. If I want to bring this up again I'll start fresh. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 18:34, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Hi again, Just an update that real life isn't going to allow me the enormous time needed to do a responsible job sorting out help and info type pages into something with a semblance of definable organization. Good luck with whatever you can do on that. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 15:16, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

New IP making same edit[edit]

Hello M. I noticed that a new IP is making the same edit as the one you filed the edit warring report for the article Decolonization of the Americas (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). I have filed a RFPP but I don't know whether it will bring a protection or not. I also started a thread on the talk page regarding the IPs theory. Thanks for your efforts in protection that article. Best regards. MarnetteD|Talk 02:27, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ALL OVER YOU (1972).gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ALL OVER YOU (1972).gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:42, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

FYI[edit]

Please see revision and opine whether you still support, or have further thoughts etc. Thanks! NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 11:34, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

[edit]

Hey Moxy. Would be willing to discuss this further? Thx Jytdog (talk) 21:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

I guess not! Ah well. Jytdog (talk) 18:37, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Shit did not see this sorry....and yes will look again later.--Moxy (talk) 18:51, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 :) I meant really talk, like on google chat or the like. I want to make sure that I have communicated the proposal well. (not to try to convince you of anything, just to make sure you understand what I have in mind.... which isn't always easy in this written format) I respect your opinion a lot! Jytdog (talk) 18:59, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Sounds good will be home later....message then a chat over tea.....Irish style for me.--Moxy (talk) 19:03, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

I can't get my mic working.....give me a bit of time--Moxy (talk) 17:25, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Getting Started[edit]

I signed up to improve the accuracy of an article about a battle in which my platoon and I served. The lock icon on the article indicates that 10 edits are required for making the improvements I have in mind. How can I achieve that number of prerequisite edits without disturbing other articles about which I know much less? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TroopHistorian (talkcontribs) 04:09, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) @TroopHistorian: You can make edit requests, until you have gained enough edits and time. - FlightTime (open channel) 04:47, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Re:Violation[edit]

OK, I was not aware of it. So i'll promise to chow down a bit (at least cut back) regarding copyright violations. Supreme Dragon (talk) 15:06, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks my friend. You owe me one. Supreme Dragon (talk) 15:24, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

RfA[edit]

New Zealand TW-17.svg Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen328 Let's discuss it 22:06, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Awards and many many tables[edit]

Hi Moxy, since this is tangenial to the accolades template discussion, I would like to mention here another problem I find often, but blatantly obvious in List of awards and nominations received by Meryl Streep. The template is at least collapsible so unless one is tempted to expand it, the page has only 1-2 extra lines. The main problem on the page is that too much inormation that could nicely fit some lists is given in little separate tables. This bloats the page horribly. I am facing similar problems in award articles where everything has to go in tables, as if good-old list form would take the luster away from the award. For example, in the last section, "Other honors", what could take the space of 7 or 8 lines in a list with 2 columns and a header, takes up a length of 55 lines of text! And I have a 1280px wide screen. Other with an 800px screen or a tablet will have an impossible page to get information from. I feel this issue of table misuse should be addressed, or maybe it has already been addressed and I simply haven't come accross it yet. Do you know of any such discussion? Thank you for your time. Hoverfish Talk 14:59, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Hey how are you doing?

Untitled Trooper(album) listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Untitled Trooper(album). Since you had some involvement with the Untitled Trooper(album) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 01:16, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Account Hyjacking[edit]

Hey Moxy,I would just like to ask if you could have a look on the Transformers "Soundwave" discussions and who they are getting posted by...I have noticed a few discussions being answered or made by certain accounts specifically with "Soundwave" in their Wiki names.Such examples of these accounts are "WikipediaSoundwave" Kazok1000 (talk) 14:26, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Also a big congratulations for becoming an administrator!!!I am sure you can make Wikipedia better! Kazok1000 (talk) 14:29, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Well hello Kazok1000 welcome......not sure what your asking? PS i am not an admin despite my tools to delete pages.--Moxy (talk) 15:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Administrator[edit]

Hi Proxy,I was just wondering if I could ask on how to become a administrator...I would love the chance to make the wiki local community better!!! Kazok1000 (talk) 14:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

pls see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship#About RfA and its process--Moxy (talk) 15:58, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

United States Wealth[edit]

The US is the wealthiest country in the world. The links I have given provide evidence.

What??--Moxy (talk) 22:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

User:ElliotR1[edit]

You and Materialscientist might be interested in this revert by Deeday-UK. As for your mentoring suggestion, the editor is indefinitely blocked and has been presumed to be Elliot Rodger, who is known for the 2014 Isla Vista killings. I'm not sure what, if anything, should be done about the user's page/talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:22, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Also, Deeday-UK made this and this edit to the user page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:25, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

I don't know if there is a policy of blanking user/talk pages of vandals that are presumed dead. If there is, I have no particular objections. Otherwise, the most sensible thing to do I'd say would be to restore the page to how the user in question left it at the time of his presumed death (which is what I did with my mentioned edits) and then have the page indefinitely protected (which I've just proposed to do). --Deeday-UK (talk) 22:15, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
User ElliotR1's page nominated for deletion. --Deeday-UK (talk) 21:43, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

handout for students editing articles on history-related topics[edit]

Hi there,

Given your experience editing history-related articles and participation in WikiProject History of Canada, I'm hoping to solicit your feedback regarding a handout Wiki Education is developing for students who want to work on articles about history-related topics: User:Ryan (Wiki Ed)/History.

It will be a print guide that history students will receive in addition to other resources, like our interactive training and brochures that address broader aspects of editing. We're hoping to get some community feedback by the end of Sunday, September 3rd, in order to meet a printing schedule. Thanks very much for your time. --Ryan (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:18, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Template:Information page[edit]

  1. Please point me to the discussion where it was decided against this text.
  2. Please tell me where you archived the content of Template talk:Information page to, and create a link to it on that page – your summary says you archived it, but it appears you just removed it.

swpbT 14:29, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

mediation link[edit]

I found the link to the case i was notified about at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Fascism Rjensen (talk) 04:23, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Minnie mouse model[edit]

Minnie mouse model sku8607822804 of a long time ago was a extrodinary piece. Night after night at the end of the day I would fantasize about one getting the treasures of my next kf kin passed down but due to flooding and of course the occasional misguided misjudged character. I was given a second chance to share this with you guys can stop now. Lily Is The flower on here blouse if you happen to get it with polka dots you'll be in for a treat 1939/=/>$#@%*****

Addition of inline styles to various message box templates[edit]

Special:Diff/799354534 seems like a generally bad idea, if such a styling is really wanted then the templates themselves should probably apply it. Anomie 16:45, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Template talk:Policy#Font size--Moxy (talk) 20:14, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
I node that decided to do it, but didn't decide on this poor implementation. I've commented on the followup discussion I see on that page. Anomie 01:40, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

random[edit]

Hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Presley65 (talkcontribs) 17:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)