User talk:Msalmon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, Msalmon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for joining our community. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. First thing: be bold! Editors are always happy to correct or revert mistakes and discuss changes with which they disagree. Here are some links you might find useful:

And for more detailed information:

  • Help pages - the instruction manual, contains everything you could possibly want to know
  • The five pillars of Wikipedia - our principles, or how to get on with other editors
  • Manual of Style - how to format articles, where to place pictures, and other stylistic matters.

You can also check out the community portal, which has lots of ideas on how you can help Wikipedia.

All of this information can be daunting, but if you have a question and can't find the answer, you can always ask me on my talk page or go to Wikipedia:Where to ask a question. One last thing: please sign your name when leaving messages for others on article and user talk pages using (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. I hope you enjoy editing!   --Sam Blanning (formerly Malthusian) (talk) 22:53, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Happy editing[edit]

Hi! Happy editing! Waterlooroadfan107 (talk) 21:08, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Souli Roots[edit]

How do you know she's not at Judges' houses? Bootcamp for the overs isn't until tomorrow. –anemoneprojectors– 21:23, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Because she was sent home --MSalmon (talk) 21:24, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Never mind, I'm watching on +1 and saw online that tonight was just the girls. But I'm now watching the overs, so she obviously didn't get through. –anemoneprojectors– 21:29, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Yes, it was the Girls and part of the Over 25s that was on tonight --MSalmon (talk) 21:31, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
I was slightly misled by what I read. Not to worry :-) –anemoneprojectors– 21:36, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Thats ok --MSalmon (talk) 21:36, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

X FACTOR[edit]

how do you know there are no live show? huh? i got proof okay.

XFactor123 (talk) 09:16, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Look at Fox's schedule, doesn't say anything about live shows --MSalmon (talk) 09:17, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Is it a full moon?[edit]

It's been an afternoon of mad levels of vandalism - drives you mad doesn't it ;) An admin will hopfully turn up soon and start banning the backlog and give us a break. KylieTastic (talk) 15:38, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

I know, and I am not sitting here reverting everything when I have better things to do with my time --MSalmon (talk) 15:40, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Motherfuckere are gonna die

Talk Back[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Msalmon. You have new messages at Livelikemusic's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
livelikemusic my talk page! 14:53, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Strictly Come Dancing (series 11), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dancing in the Dark (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

FYI[edit]

Just thought you'd want to know that one of your IP fans posted a comment to Talk:Timeline of Google Street View posing as you (made it look like a typical signature), which Sinebot then signed because he/she didn't put the four tildes. Don't worry, I reverted the edits. Paris1127 (talk) 16:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, didn't see it because I was at work --MSalmon (talk) 18:04, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello! :)[edit]

May I ask how do we leave comment when we edit? Like how you leave comment when you edited my post? ~XFactor123 — Preceding unsigned comment added by XFactor123 (talkcontribs) 12:10, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Just type it in the box below where it says Edit Summary --MSalmon (talk) 12:30, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Oh Thank You very Much :) Please update the 'U.S Rating', they are all messed up! ~XFactor123 — Preceding unsigned comment added by XFactor123 (talkcontribs) 13:20, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Don't know what they are sorry, and remember to sign your posts by using the pen icon or type ~~~~ --MSalmon (talk) 13:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Oh. Can we chat personally? --XFactor123 (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2013 (UTC)XFactor123
Why? --MSalmon (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
nvm. :) --XFactor123 (talk) 03:14, 24 November 2013 (UTC)XFactor123
You mean type ~~~~ ;-) –anemoneprojectors– 16:18, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Yes --MSalmon (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Are you a girl or a boy? --XFactor123 (talk) 13:10, 25 November 2013 (UTC)XFactor123

Why are you interested? --MSalmon (talk) 13:16, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo
Hello! Msalmon, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Herald talk with me 13:45, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

IP 5.66[edit]

Blocked. Leaky Caldron 17:16, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank god for that --MSalmon (talk) 17:17, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! (UK series 11)[edit]

Hi. You said that "it was Crissy and Mark in the bottom two on 18 not Crissy and Willie" but the table shows Willie was 5th in the vote, not Mark. Does this mean that the figures quoted in the table are wrong (the reference is dead so I can't check) or that the two people Ant and Dec said "it could be you" to, weren't the two that were actually in the bottom two? If so, the key is wrong. Just wanted to clarify as it doesn't add up. –anemoneprojectors– 21:36, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

The table that I have changed it to now is correct (I have the figures in an Excel spreadsheet) --MSalmon (talk) 22:01, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
You didn't answer my question. Does it mean that Mark wasn't in the bottom two of the vote that week, but was he called out as "it might be you"? Because if it does, the key is wrong. –anemoneprojectors– 11:30, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
He was in the bottom two as indicated in the "bottom two" row on the table --MSalmon (talk) 11:36, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
The term "bottom two" implies that he received the lowest votes. The table shows someone else received the lowest votes. I changed the note in the key, because he didn't receive the second lowest number of votes. Why do we (on Wikipedia) call it the bottom two, when it's not always the official bottom two? Do we know why they sometimes call out someone else? –anemoneprojectors– 16:08, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
You can change the key but nothing else --MSalmon (talk) 16:11, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Same as Crissy in the second vote, and others possibly in that year and definitely in other years. What's being called the bottom two on Wikipedia isn't always the people with the fewest votes, so it's not the bottom two. It should be renamed, shouldn't it? –anemoneprojectors– 16:12, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
To what though? --MSalmon (talk) 16:13, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
I just spotted that series 13 has an "NB", explaining it. I don't know if it's on all of them because I haven't checked. The Daily Mirror called it the bottom two so as at least one reliable source call it then we don't need to change it - I had assumed Wikipedians decided. Though I don't recall anyone on the programme saying that the "bottom two" doesn't reflect the votes, and people probably assume that it always does and it could easily affect the votes. I might complain to Ofcom ;-) –anemoneprojectors– 16:23, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Ok, that's fine then --MSalmon (talk) 16:25, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Added a note to series 11, the first year where the "bottom two" didn't always follow the vote. Series 12 and 13 already have these notes. That's that sorted then! –anemoneprojectors– 16:31, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Ok cool, will add the camp saviour vote on the "reults and elimination" table later tonight. --MSalmon (talk) 17:56, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

CBB 2013[edit]

Just noticed the spat you're having with 2.30.20.205 over number of nominations. Have to say I think he's right and you're wrong. To say that Casey and Lee have zero nominations implies that it was possible for them to be nominated but did not receive any when, in fact, they were not eligible for nominations so n/a would, to me, seem to be correct.--The Totter 02:58, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

So what that Casey and Lee were not eligible to be nominated, it is explained in the notes, and anyway they are returning to the house tonight (10 January) so they are eligible to be nominated --MSalmon (talk) 14:03, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
No – returning to the house yes but they're not eligible to be nominated for eviction tonight, which was the point of your spat.--The Totter 15:33, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Why did you revert it then change it back to zero? --MSalmon (talk) 15:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Surely not having the chance to receive any nominations means that stating it as none applicable shows that they couldn't have got any. Whilst 0 suggests that they haven't received any at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.30.20.205 (talk) 22:54, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
I think you are missing the point here, they were still housemates when they were living in the Bolt Hole even though could not be nominated, but now they are back in the house it can be left as 0 --MSalmon (talk) 22:58, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

But they still have not gone through a nominations process, meaning that they haven't got 0, because they didn't receive no nominations. They were in the Bolt Hole, making them not eligible to be nominated. Therefore it should be N/A. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.30.20.205 (talk) 08:03, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

They will go through it tomorrow --MSalmon (talk) 11:12, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

But they haven't gone through it yet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.30.20.205 (talk) 14:50, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

No but they will tomorrow, anyway the page is semi-protected now so you won't be able to edit it unless you create an account--MSalmon (talk) 14:54, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Howdy, have added Day 11's doings but in doing so managed to bugger up the formatting. Could you be a dear and fix it please? Thanks.--The Totter 01:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Seems fine to me --MSalmon (talk) 10:21, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

The Voice UK articles[edit]

Ok. I'm fine with your edits. Face-smile.svg But I made some changes in the The Voice UK (series 1), I hope you don't change those.--AR E N Z O Y 1 6At a l k 13:20, 28 January 2014 (UTC) No, they are ok with me --MSalmon (talk) 13:21, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dancing on Ice (series 5), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Michael Ball and Songbird (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 23 February[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 01:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

GBSB Wiki[edit]

I see that you've contributed to The_Great_British_Sewing_Bee_(series_2); why not contribute to The Great British Sewing Bee Wiki? Jesse Groppi (talk) 15:40, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

X Factor[edit]

With regards to the summary table, I the following proposal at Talk:The_X_Factor_(UK_TV_series)#Small_text_proposal_to_alter_table. to improve readability per WP:ACCESS, what do you think? → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 01:05, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Draw It!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Julian Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Big Brother 15 (UK), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Channel 5 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

BGT[edit]

Hiya, I added the 1st/2nd/3rd but was reverted by one editor so I assumed my other addition was also incorrect. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 21:32, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

It was fine before you reverted it --MSalmon (talk) 21:33, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Well since I was confused I reverted both of my additions! →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 21:37, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Thats ok the
  • "Top 3 (lost judges' vote)" means they came third. "Top 3 (won judges' vote)" means they came second. What's so hard to understand. And my mother taught me that you only swear when you're losing. 78.147.146.4 (talk) 18:57, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Wait until the results of the public vote to be released, like every single year --MSalmon (talk) 18:59, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Edit Warring[edit]

Hiya Msalmon,
Just a friendly note - Please don't edit war,
Either discuss the issue with the editor or If you think it's necessary report them :)
Cheers, →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 19:20, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Voice UK, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Royal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tumble (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Louis Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

The Jump Results[edit]

Hi MSalmon, How are you? Just to let you know that there is an unregistered user on the loose who is getting rid of a lot of stats and other sources, mainly on ITV programs, (saying that ITV press is not a valid source, even though people have been using it here for a long while). As you can see on the edit history for the Jump, he will just revert your edits for the reasons described. (WP:NOTSTATS and no source for the episode results.) So I would suggest watching out for his reverts on this programme and who knows, he soon may delete statistics on any other pages similar to this citing the same reasons. It's starting to get annoying, so be on the look out. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/81.154.188.16 173.179.185.186 (talk) 17:15, 2 September 2014 (UTC)samusek2

101Wizards[edit]

...has been blocked for 48 hours. He not only vandalized Big Brother but this is his idea of humor. ```Buster Seven Talk 21:14, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Stephanie indeed goes for deadlock in Week 1 and she should named as Bottom three in Week 1. Chloe indeed goes for deadlock in Week 2 and been voted off so she should named 13th. Chloe indeed goes for deadlock in Week 3 and been voted off so he should named 12th.

What has that got to do with me? --MSalmon (talk) 16:54, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Jump (series 2), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jackass. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Voice UK (series 4), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marvin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

CELEBRITY BIG BROTHER 15[edit]

Hello, sorry about that (deleting the table) I didn't realise you were waiting until a certain time, I was going by the current released ratings, okay sorry I'll leave it to you! However It would be good if you left the first part of the article which I changed because it previously said 'Emma willis will return to the series' but I changed it to 'returned' obviously because it's launched now and she's returned....

It's only the official ratings that we add in --MSalmon (talk) 15:56, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
The bit about Emma was already changed --MSalmon (talk) 16:03, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Big Brother UK Series Details[edit]

Hi there,

I noticed you reasonably undid my edits when I added the celebrity versions to the series details and understandibly they were deleted as the celebrity version has its own page. Just to ask, is it ok if I undo it for now as in my opinion, I don't think Big Brother & Celebrity Big Brother should be seperate articles. It's the same show more or less, and I wouldn't really consider it a spin-off. I'm aiming to merge the Celebrity article into the main one. It's all Big Brother UK at the end of the day. ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simkinsjohn1 (talkcontribs) 20:55, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coast (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ian McMillan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Big Brother 5[edit]

I've added a link to the episode on the talk page. I don't know what RachelRice is talking about, neither Davina or Big Brother referred to it as nominations. ThisIsDanny (talk) 22:51, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

That's what I kept saying but she didn't listen to me --MSalmon (talk) 18:03, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
She's now requesting we change the nominations table for Big Brother 15 on the talk page. Tell me it's not just me who thinks her idea is ridiculous. ThisIsDanny (talk) 16:52, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 16 August[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Celebrity Big Brother[edit]

Hello, Msalmon. This is TVShowsEditor. I put Day 6 in the nomination table because the first eviction is taking place in the 1st of September. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TVShowsEditer (talkcontribs) 22:05, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Put the day they nominate in not the eviction day. --MSalmon (talk) 22:08, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 21) edit[edit]

"please don't abbreviate"? Why the heck not?? (1) TV isn't really an abbreviation, it's another word/spelling. (2) If you say that for TV, why wouldn't you say the same for R&B? (3) There's nothing wrong with it - especially on a article about a U.S. show, and especially in the Notability column where it should be kept as short as possible. --Musdan77 (talk) 04:35, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Well it can't be changed because the page has been fully protected now --MSalmon (talk) 09:19, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Anything can be changed if you make an edit request for an admin to do so. –anemoneprojectors– 13:52, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I just felt the need to clarify that. But if this is the reason for the protection, then probably not. –anemoneprojectors– 13:55, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2015[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! (UK series 15) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I know you are trying to reach a consensus, but you have now violated the 3 revert rule. I won't report you however (because I'm nice), but please don't do it again on any other article. I have seen many people being blocked for 3RR violations and i really don't want to see you being blocked for this. Thank you for your co-operation Class455fan1 (talk to me) 23:26, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

I did reply but no one has replied to mine yet --MSalmon (talk) 23:28, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
I will do, but i go on a 5 day WikiBreak tomorrow because of exams Class455fan1 (talk to me) 23:38, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year Msalmon![edit]

February 2016[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Haymarket bus station, Leicester, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 00:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

List of Big Brother 4 HouseGuests (Canada)[edit]

This article was sent to an AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Big Brother 4 HouseGuests (Canada), where the consensus was that it should redirect to the season's article. If you have information to add, it should go there. If you disagree with the decision at AFD, you can discuss it at the season article's talk page, or you can go to WP:DRV. Please do not revert the redirect without discussing the matter first. Thanks. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 20:21, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

There is no discussion on the articles talk page, it was just me saying the article needed updating. --MSalmon (talk) 20:22, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Correct, the discussion was all at the Articles for Deletion debate that I linked above. If you like, you can make a draft article with updates that you'd want to add, and then propose that the redirect be turned into that draft - but, for now, the consensus is that there is not enough sourced information for a separate article on the houseguests themselves. If you have information to add about them, feel free to add it to the season article itself. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 20:32, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
I created the article because the past three seasons have one. --MSalmon (talk) 20:46, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Voice UK, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jolan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Haymarket bus station, Leicester, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 18:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

The others[edit]

The others are classed as having housemate status on the official website. Click onto one of the photos and it says housemate status: Housemate

They SHOULD be in the info box because it's likely there are going to be lots of changes . Like previous series with the halfway house in Bb8 and BB10 when Benazir didn't receive full housemate status. Andybigbro2 (talk) 19:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2016[edit]

Information icon Please do not assume ownership of articles. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. Leaky Caldron 15:05, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Leaky Caldron 15:10, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

I was not the one who started all of this so don't blame me, I was just following all previous series --MSalmon (talk) 15:11, 17 July 2016 (UTC)