User talk:Murry1975

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Thanks for the thanks![edit]

Nice to be appreciated on occasion! Happy editing. danno_uk 22:52, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Martin (boxer) (2nd nomination)[edit]

Hi Murry1975. Because you participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Martin (boxer), you may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Martin (boxer) (2nd nomination). Cunard (talk) 03:00, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

User talk:Favonian[edit]

Hi, Murry1975, thanks for reverting. That was a paste of a warning Favonian had given User:Spoonplate. It's funny how often that happens with the newbies — not sure if it's retaliation or what. Usually it's done a little more smartly, such as, without including F's own sig in the copypaste. ;-) I've told them it was silly. Bishonen | talk 21:43, 18 January 2015 (UTC).

@Bishonen: Oh, never underestimate the creativeness of a newbie troll. The links to the MoS and welcome page had been modified most imaginatively. :) Favonian (talk) 22:02, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Ha! I never looked at the links! It's amazing I'm still so naive after ten years' experience of trolls. You know, all the edits are disruptive except possibly the first one, back in March. Look at the messaround with Rosalynn Carter's photo. I've indeffed. Bishonen | talk 23:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC).
Bless ya! I contemplated the Rosalynn situation, but then again a first lady must be used to having her picture taken next to all sorts of riff-raff. ;) Good riddance to the spoon. Favonian (talk) 23:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Can I Do[edit]

Hi I have came across the wikipedia program policies now after some mistakes noticed recently. Can I update any articles, from now for best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tollysurya (talkcontribs) 01:13, 16 February 2015 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Murry1975. You have new messages at Talk:Chabad#Child_sexual_abuse.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Murry1975.

I want to reassure you on your talkpage, which I see as a more personal way of conversation, that my issue with your restore of the paragraph in question is only procedural. I think you made the wrong decision in implementing Wikipedia guidelines on dispute resolution. I do not want to escalate this issue at this stage, so I'd like to ask you to read the argument I presented once more, not as to the content of the paragraph, but whether resting it in its entirety after one hour of discussion and a total of 3 editors expressing their opinions was the right thing to do. If you tell me that you do think you made the right call, then I will ask at a formal dispute resolution channel if it is perhaps me who has misunderstood these guidelines. If you can live with restoring the consensus version till such time as a firmer consensus on the content issue has been established, then we will all end up happy. Debresser (talk) 21:52, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

typos in quotes[edit]

No biggie, but re: your reversion of my edit, please note: MOS:QUOTE. Fixing minro typos that do not change the meaning of the quote significantly are permitted. It improves readability in many cases. --LilHelpa (talk) 12:39, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

From user Sixgirls[edit]

Hmmm... Editing pages does not seem to be a straightforward way to communicate, but it does seem to make sense when it comes to preserving correspondence. That said, what about my edit of SHARE seemed to suggest that it was practice? I do not see anywhere in the article where the acronym is explained, which is why I inserted it.

A cheat sheet of tags would be nice, by the way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sixgirls (talkcontribs) 00:56, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

urban dictionary[edit]

Thanks for the heads up. I was unaware. You could have just deleted and put that in the edit summary, but thanks for the note. Capitalismojo (talk) 20:48, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi Murry, Re Big Jim Starritt[edit]

I served under him at West End Central, on and off for sixteen years, and anybody who served under him would tell you the same. As Deputy Commissioner(2IC of The Metropolitan Police) he visited the communications room at the station on one occasion and asked me in a serious but tongue in cheek tone "I hear somebody is usurping my name, is this so?" I don't need a citation, but if you wait long enough I'm sure some other "C" Div. Vet. will back me up, or almost any ex-met. officer from that era. Truly, word had reached him that there was a sergeant on the shift who also rejoiced in the nickname "Big Jim"

Regarding copyrights[edit]

well what if I take a screenshot from watching a movie, can I then use that photo? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sebahed (talkcontribs) 17:24, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Again the owner of the copyright is the production company. Anyone who produces the image, moving or still, owns the copyright. Murry1975 (talk) 17:33, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Try this one[edit]

Republic of Ireland Act 1948. Gob Lofa (talk) 16:22, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

A yes the state added a discription. After it acted the Constitution of Ireland in 1937. Murry1975 (talk) 16:25, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
How was it described by the world in the meantime? Gob Lofa (talk) 17:33, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Why are you interested in "How was it described", green grab you as a good description? If not its name is and was from 1937 Ireland. Murry1975 (talk) 17:39, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Because I'm pretty sure it wasn't as 'Republic of Ireland'. Gob Lofa (talk) 19:24, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
And you point you are trying to convey is.... Murry1975 (talk) 19:28, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Why would you give something a description it refuses to give itself? You're picking up a bad habit of glibness from the wrong talk pages. 'Green' is no kind of noun. Gob Lofa (talk) 19:35, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Gob Lofa/Lapsed Pacifist, or what ever you like to call or describe yourself, start making your point or dont bother typing anything here. Murry1975 (talk) 19:39, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
That's interesting. Gob Lofa (talk) 19:45, 23 March 2015 (UTC)


Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 18:56, 20 April 2015 (UTC)


Hi Murray1975. I've seen that you've taken interest in Chabad sex-abuse. I thought that you would be interested to know that according to the Halacha sex with a boy who is less than 9 years of age is not sex with a man and is therefore permitted. Proof: More proof: Amalek 0123456789 (talk) 19:10, 23 June 2015 (UTC)