|Please leave messages and questions below.
User talk:Murry1976 redirects here.
Sorted by date:
Thanks for the thanks!
Hi Murry1975. Because you participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Martin (boxer), you may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Martin (boxer) (2nd nomination). Cunard (talk) 03:00, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Murry1975, thanks for reverting. That was a paste of a warning Favonian had given User:Spoonplate. It's funny how often that happens with the newbies — not sure if it's retaliation or what. Usually it's done a little more smartly, such as, without including F's own sig in the copypaste. ;-) I've told them it was silly. Bishonen | talk 21:43, 18 January 2015 (UTC).
- @Bishonen: Oh, never underestimate the creativeness of a newbie troll. The links to the MoS and welcome page had been modified most imaginatively. :) Favonian (talk) 22:02, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- Ha! I never looked at the links! It's amazing I'm still so naive after ten years' experience of trolls. You know, all the edits are disruptive except possibly the first one, back in March. Look at the messaround with Rosalynn Carter's photo. I've indeffed. Bishonen | talk 23:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC).
Can I Do
Hi I have came across the wikipedia program policies now after some mistakes noticed recently. Can I update any articles, from now for best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tollysurya (talk • contribs) 01:13, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
I want to reassure you on your talkpage, which I see as a more personal way of conversation, that my issue with your restore of the paragraph in question is only procedural. I think you made the wrong decision in implementing Wikipedia guidelines on dispute resolution. I do not want to escalate this issue at this stage, so I'd like to ask you to read the argument I presented once more, not as to the content of the paragraph, but whether resting it in its entirety after one hour of discussion and a total of 3 editors expressing their opinions was the right thing to do. If you tell me that you do think you made the right call, then I will ask at a formal dispute resolution channel if it is perhaps me who has misunderstood these guidelines. If you can live with restoring the consensus version till such time as a firmer consensus on the content issue has been established, then we will all end up happy. Debresser (talk) 21:52, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
typos in quotes
No biggie, but re: your reversion of my edit, please note: MOS:QUOTE. Fixing minro typos that do not change the meaning of the quote significantly are permitted. It improves readability in many cases. --LilHelpa (talk) 12:39, 26 February 2015 (UTC)