User talk:Musiccensorship
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Freemuse, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.freemuse.org/sw184.asp. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Freemuse, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freemuse. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Dougie WII (talk) 19:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Freemuse
[edit]Articles for deletion are up for five days, after which they can be closed at any time. You should have brought up your changes at the AfD, but at any rate, they were too little too late. I don't believe it clearly demonstrate the subject's notability with reliable sources (most of the sources were to the site itself, and the two in the notability section were minor mentions. You also failed to convince any other editors even after your changes.
- If you wish, I can undelete the page and move it to your user space, where you can continue to work on it. If, in the future, you are able to find enough external reliable sources to demonstrate notability, the article can be recreated. Barring that you can file at Wikipedia:Deletion review.--Cúchullain t/c 21:26, 10 January 2008 (UTC)