User talk:NFH

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The links we're arguing over[edit]

Sorry for the snarky edit summary when I removed them again. Bad day and I shouldn't be taking it out on you. --GraemeL (talk) 22:51, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Russia on the right side[edit]

Hallo! Do you really believe that Russia was driving to the left well into the XX century? Where did you get this absurd information from? That fact is that the country must have driving on the right side at least since 1858. At that year the Emperor Alexander II issud a decree changing from left to right in Finland. Finland was ceded by Sweden to Russia in 1809, but Swedish law remained in force (e.g. left-hand driving). The change was made to make it more easy for the Russian troops in Finland. Should this change in Finland have been implemented if the Russians themselves were right-hand drivers? --Andhanq 21:45, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

It was not I who made the contribution about Russia driving on the left until 1920. It was user User: who contributed this on 04-Dec-2005. I simply reverted several unexplained deletions of this information. If those people had bothered to explain their deletions in the Edit Summary, I would not have reverted the deletions. As you have explained your edit, I will not revert your edit, although it does need further editing. The contributor on 04-Dec-2005 told me in an e-mail "However, I do finally have a date for Russia's L to R change: 1920. I got this from a very very old (but still fully conversant) Russian gentleman, who's one of my patients. Lenin's order in 1920 applied to all territory under Bolshevik control, and was extended to other areas as the Bolsheviks consolidated their gains."
Interesting. Could there had been some cities in the vast Rusian Empire with left-hand driving? In e.g. the Austro-Hungarian Empire as well as in Italy there were different rules in different parts of the country. And "Lenin's order" was simply an act of making it uniform all over the territory? I have no idea. But I am pretty sure that in Moscow and S:t Petersburg they drove on the right side already in the 19th century. There are pictures wiyh trams and so on. --Andhanq 09:03, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Eurocheque.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Eurocheque.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you. -- Carnildo 05:50, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Rules of the road[edit]

I moved all the left and right side of the road stuff to Side of the road (traffic). Also, about driving on the left being safer, there will always be too many variables to attempt an accurate comparison. With the theory of humans being right-handed and all, you can easily say they are more likely to walk along the right edge of walkways, turn right when entering places, write their circles counter-clockwise, move in counter-clockwise directions, etc. But if you could help with the article Side of the road (traffic), that would be great.—Last Avenue (talk) (contribs) 05:28, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

The text you removed about the research by J J Leeming was about statistics, not about opinion. Please do not remove it, as it is relevant hard fact. If you want to make the advantages more balanced (which I would welcome), please add to the advantages of the right, not remove from the advantages of the left. NFH 09:51, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

RHD on the Continent[edit]

One thing I'm pretty sure has already been proven is, drivers in an RHD car on the Continent suffer get into accidents, etc. much more often, even among veterans (lorry drivers etc.) —Last Avenue (talk) (contribs) 05:30, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

True, and I covered this in the first paragraph of the advantages of driving on the right. NFH 09:51, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Renaming: Rule of the road[edit]

The problem is, there is no easy way to rename the article without breaking links, because the article Rules of the road should still be about the usual driving rules, and Rule of the road about left/side right of the road. If Rules of the road were a redirect to Rule of the road, where would the 'actual' rules of the road text go? —Last Avenue (talk) (contribs) 21:27, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Edit (new idea): Rules of the road could be a temporary redirect to Rule of the road, while the links are being 'fixed' to avoid the redirect. Then, Traffic laws could be the new page of traffic laws. Sound alright? —Last Avenue (talk) (contribs) 21:31, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Point of information[edit]

Hello. Regarding your recent edit at Rules of the road, your summary reads in part "It was inconsistent anyway, given that it isn't a link elsewhere in this article" Just a friendly point of information: it is suggested that terms are only linked at their first mention, see Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(links)#Internal_links. Ewlyahoocom 04:57, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

But the link was not the first mention of the phrase. That was my point. In the first "right" list, the phrase had no link, but in the second "left" list, the phrase was linked. That was inconsistent. NFH 09:16, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Speed trap[edit]

Thanks for your comprehensive edit to Speed trap. The U.K. and France perspective you added really helps the article! • WarpFlyght (talk) 05:48, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Kerb versus Curb[edit]

Please come discuss harmonizing "kerb" and "curb" pages at Talk:Curb#Curb versus Kerb. Ewlyahoocom 08:18, 30 March 2006 (UTC)


I'm going to tweak the levels on this pic as it is rather dull. Hope that is OK with you. Guinnog 09:38, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Yes, please do. I took it on a dull rainy day in January 2002. NFH 13:20, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, I have done. Please check that you are ok with the copyright and credit tags I have used. THanks again. Guinnog 13:23, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bose Headphone Family[edit]

I know that you have don't usually work on Bose related pages but I was hoping that I could get you involved with the discussion here! Thanks :) -- UKPhoenix79 11:27, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Citations for Driving on left or right[edit]


Yes, I was a bit irritated at Terminal emulator's threats to delete large amounts of information on Driving on the left or right on the grounds it wasn't 'verifiable'.

Much of the information was probably added years back when there was less of an onus on contributors to add references, and it would be unrealistic to chase them up. However, I have added some references, including one to the Avis website for the Bahamas [1]. (Most of the models they feature are available in RHD, but they still have an all-LHD fleet!)

Registration Plates of the World Neil Parker, John Weeks and Reg Wilson, Europlate, 1994 has pictures of special number plates for Hong Kong and Macau registered vehicles in mainland China, but nothing driving on the left during the Cultural Revolution. Its information is probably similar to Kincaid, although it claims that Western Samoa drove on the left, whereas I've seen pictures in a Lonely Planet Guide, in which traffic was on the right. Quiensabe 00:16, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Yes, thanks very much for adding all the references. Some of them are very interesting to read. I think you're absolutely right about how the article evolved. I'm reluctant to add the page number for everything that is backed up by Kincaid's book, as it supports so much of the article and the number of references would get out of hand. But links to newspaper articles etc like the ones you've added are great. NFH 19:19, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Merry Christmas[edit]

I just wanted to wish you a Merry Christmas -- UKPhoenix79 25 December 2006

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Union Bank of Switzerland.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Union Bank of Switzerland.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Money Reform Party[edit]

Nuvola apps important yellow.svg

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Money Reform Party, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Terraxos (talk) 01:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

The Money Reform Party article is now going through the formal articles for deletion processWikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Money_Reform_Party at which you are invited to make comment and vote on this deletion proposal doktorb wordsdeeds 11:57, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

File:History of london std codes.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:History of london std codes.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 05:57, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Right & Left Hand Traffic again[edit]

Hi, NFH. The title of Right- and left-hand traffic is under discussion again. I am alerting you because you participated in a previous discussion on the matter. —Scheinwerfermann T·C01:29, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

iPad Mini[edit]

Please stop pushing your tax agenda on only the one article. You'll notice that other articles list prices without taxes. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:42, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

I don't have a tax agenda, but I do believe that if prices from different countries are listed, they should be comparable without misleading omissions such as some excluding tax. If you are unwilling to list the prices in a comparable way, then don't list them at all. Contrary to your comment, no other page about an iOS device lists prices. NFH (talk) 22:09, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
You do. Several editors have removed the statement. Add it to other, similar articles to see where that gets you. It's trivial information. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:27, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
You aggressively and incorrectly claimed that my good-faith edits were vandalism, just because you didn't agree with them. They were not vandalism any more than your own edits. Although the prices have now been removed in accordance with the no-price policy, how do you expect a non-US reader to know that the US price excludes tax if this is not made clear? Although it is irrelevant that other articles might be similarly deficient, you have failed to cite any other article that likewise mixes excl-tax and incl-tax prices from multiple countries without indicating which prices exclude tax. NFH (talk) 07:24, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on IPad Mini. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Four reverts in just over 24 hours and you still have not indicated any other articles where your "excluding taxes" has been used. Be prepared for someone else to revert it because it's full of holes. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:24, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:Channel Tunnel France 1.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:16, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

failure to discuss[edit]

You are not answering my objection to your edit in my edit summary or on the talk page. Please do so. Sceptic1954 (talk) 20:42, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notification[edit]

Commons-emblem-notice.svg Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:40, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Charlie Hebdo shooting[edit]

You added the name of a company to the article without giving a source: please don't do this, as this kind of original reporting is considered to be original research, and not allowed by Wikipedia's policies. -- The Anome (talk) 10:21, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Telegraphic transfer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SEPA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Drip pricing has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Drip pricing. Thanks! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:27, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Drip pricing has been accepted[edit]

Drip pricing, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

North America1000 19:20, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Please claim your upload(s): File:Savoy-court-drive-right-in.JPG[edit]

Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as {{own}}, amending the {{information}} added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transfered to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:51, 3 June 2016 (UTC)