User talk:NHCLS

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

March 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Baldwin Kho may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {dablinks|date=March 2014}}<
  • | The Journey (Decade of creative excellence || March 2007 || Kaisa Heritage Center

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:55, 18 March 2014 (UTC)==

Hi[edit]

I might disagree with you but thank you for abstaining from actions and behaviors which do not honor wikis spirit. My talkpage is strong evidence of that , threads etc . I m not claiming I m right in everything and Im ready to change my mind if good arguments are presented. Best--George1935 (talk) 22:49, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Badr Bin Haider[edit]

Hello NHCLS,

I wrote an article about Badr Bin Haider, my apologies if I brake rules in promoting a person work, but I was not selling any thing its just a biography, just trying to create something new in my free time, now this name is written as spam or as in watch list, I want it to be deleted and kindly I need help cause as a business man its bad for my reputation to show as a spammer.

Thanks & regards, Deeboss123 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deeboss123 (talkcontribs) 00:13, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Barry Karr[edit]

Hello NHCLS,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Barry Karr for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ging287 (talk) 21:30, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, NHCLS. You have new messages at Hell in a Bucket's talk page.
Message added 20:23, 1 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hell in a Bucket (talk) 20:23, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Slawomir Kostrzewa for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Slawomir Kostrzewa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slawomir Kostrzewa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. M. Caecilius (talk) 22:11, 3 April 2014 (UTC)


Escape From The Shadow Garden[edit]

It's just the same text displayed on the main Magnum article. I only copied and pasted it. Delete it if you want. Arsenanuf (talk) 00:19, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sergei Verenkin[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Sergei Verenkin has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ging287 (talk) 18:37, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Sergei Verenkin) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Sergei Verenkin, NHCLS!

Wikipedia editor OccultZone just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Add some citations.

To reply, leave a comment on OccultZone's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Proposed deletion of Sean Connolly[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Sean Connolly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet the requirements of WP:NHOCKEY, as he never played in a top professional league (e.g. NHL), didn't play 200 games in a top-level minor league (e.g. AHL), received no preeminent honors in junior league or college, wasn't a first-round draft pick, didn't play on a national team, and isn't a hall of fame member.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 15:28, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Derrick Byfuglien[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Derrick Byfuglien has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable per the standards of WP:NHOCKEY. Per Wikipedia:WikiProject_Ice_Hockey/League_assessment, EHCL doesn't satisfy criterion #3.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 15:41, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, NHCLS. You have new messages at Ahecht's talk page.
Message added 15:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 15:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of François Hardy[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article François Hardy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability standards of WP:NHOCKEY. Not a first-round NHL pick, and QMHJL, UHL, QSPHL, and LNAH don't satisfy criterioa #1, #2, or #3 per WP:NHOCKEY/LA.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 15:56, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, NHCLS. You have new messages at Ahecht's talk page.
Message added 15:59, 6 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 15:59, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brock Hooton[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Brock Hooton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability standards of WP:NHOCKEY. Not a first-round NHL pick, didn't play enough AHL games to satisfy criterion #3, and other leagues he played for don't satisfy criteria #1, #2, or #3 per WP:NHOCKEY/LA.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 16:06, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nick Gillis[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Nick Gillis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability standards of WP:NHOCKEY. Not a first-round NHL pick and college play doesn't satisfy criterion #4.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 16:07, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Scott Dobben[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Scott Dobben has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability standards of WP:NHOCKEY. Not a first-round NHL pick, did not play 200 games in the AHL per criterion #3, and other leagues played in don't satisfy criteria #1, #2, or #3 per WP:NHOCKEY/LA.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 16:16, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Josef Vávra[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Josef Vávra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability standards of WP:NHOCKEY. Not a first-round NHL pick and other leagues played in don't satisfy criteria #1, #2, or #3 per WP:NHOCKEY/LA.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 16:20, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Wikner[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article John Wikner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability standards of WP:NHOCKEY. Not a first-round NHL pick and other leagues played in don't satisfy criteria #1, #2, or #3 per WP:NHOCKEY/LA.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 16:22, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Don't get discouraged![edit]

I know it can be discouraging to have your articles deleted or proposed for deletion, and I just wanted to let you know that your efforts to expand Wikipedia are very much appreciated. You might want to look over the guide at Wikipedia:Starting an article or consult the Wikipedia:Teahouse or Wikipedia:Help desk. Thanks again for your efforts! --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 16:33, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Peer Hull Kristensen[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Peer Hull Kristensen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Biographical articles about academics must meet the notability guidelines for Academics, with reference to reliable, third-party sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Slashme (talk) 11:25, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Karussell[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Karussell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Finngall talk 17:23, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Karussell[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Karussell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ciao Mane (talk) 11:18, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Southern Cross (band)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Southern Cross (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 23:14, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Drew neilson nz[edit]

Creator removed your db tags. I restored them. --Jersey92 (talk) 02:24, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

SEAN MOYSES[edit]

I was hoping that others would contribute to the article. Moyses is one of the greatest virtuosi of all time and deserves some coveraage in Wikipedia.


TRIKER1 (talk) 18:24, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Jane Visvader[edit]

Hello NHCLS. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jane Visvader, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 01:55, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Simulacrum (band)[edit]

Hello, NHCLS,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Simulacrum (band) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simulacrum (band) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 00:25, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Copy editing Ajay K. Sood[edit]

Hi mate, you tagged the article I created today, Ajay K. Sood for copy editing. I have since done a bit to clear the ambiguities. Could you please have a look again and advise how we may better it? Cheers!!--jojo@nthony (talk) 15:51, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick revert. Much appreciated. Dr. Sood's contributions leaving a long trail, I would check up with other editors as well, just the way you suggested. Still, your intervention prompted me to have a second look and it helped a lot. I am also working on the other article you have tagged, Sunil Pradhan. Meanwhile, if you feel the grammar part of Sood article is taken care of, please remove the tag. That would make it look better. Thank you once again, cheers mate!!--jojo@nthony (talk) 16:10, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Evidence for Democracy[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Evidence for Democracy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 23:49, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Ernie Yard[edit]

Hello NHCLS,

Thanks for patrolling etc. Ernie Yard & for moving the page, (can't believe I missed the lacking capital!). I have added categories, which I was advised, when asking at the Teahouse, not to do for new articles, until they'd been accepted. However, I have a couple of questions. Firstly, the article already contains refs. for name date/place of birth & death & just about everything else is sourced from the neilbrown stats site, I.e. here, which is included in Ext links. It seems unwieldy to repeat the same ref. for each change of club & I've not seen other similar "stubs" (basically only a lead) referenced in that way. Perhaps you could advise what could be done to improve this point? Thanks. Secondly, I note persondata has been deleted, & again I was advised this should habitually be included so wonder if you could clarify for future reference? Thanks. Regards. Eagleash (talk) 20:25, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

  • First, sorry for the delay in my answer. In response to your questions:
  1. Why repeat the same reference for each change in club? I'm not entirely certain what you were asking here, so forgive me if I don't answer that question. The reason I added a refimprove tag to the page was not because of the lack of inline citations (there is a separate tag for that). It was more that the total number of references for the page (the Purkiss & Sands book & the neilbrown web site) is very small (2 references). The tag is there in order to prompt editors to find new references and add them.
  2. Why was the persondata deleted? As for that, I generally just delete persondata, to keep the page clean. I don't actually know if that's good editing practice or not... I didn't pass through the teahouse when I started editing; I pretty much just learned as I went along, essentially improvising... I would suggest consulting another editor (esp. an admin) as regards to that question.

I hope that I have answered your questions. Of course, if you have any other questions or comments feel free to contact me. Merci beaucoup!NHCLS (talk) 18:46, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello again NHCLS
Thanks for replying. (No probs. re time!) I think we are perhaps looking at things from a different perspective. Firstly, by way of explanation, my point re the “unwieldy” refs. was really more to do with in-line citations. Yard’s career details were all sourced from the neilbrown site, (which is something of a “go-to” source for obscure ex-footballers) so to repeat that as an in-line ref would be overdoing it a bit. I see what you mean by the lack of additional refs., but it’s only a stub article, with very brief details, for a bit part player from 50 years ago. Refs. other than Purkiss/Sands/King are probably a bit like hens teeth, & the basic details are referenced/sourced. Sands BTW is the official Crystal Palace F.C. historian and also co-wrote the -2011 book with King but declined credit as author. I will try to find other refs. or links though.
As far as persondata is concerned it says here that these should be added, so if you are deleting them, I guess that might be frowned upon by somebody! :) I’ve already restored them as it happens. Thanks. Regards. Eagleash (talk) 20:33, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the link regarding persondate; I will change my ways! As for the inline citations, I agree with you, I do not see the point in adding inline citations for every little detail; esp. since it's all from the same site. Merci beaucoup! NHCLS (talk) 01:42, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks ofcourse[edit]

Thanks for the heads up! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChoiceNZ (talkcontribs) 20:11, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Regarding Empty sections[edit]

I'm assuming you mean empty section under general elections? Well I'm adding those sections for a reason. There was an election in 2013 and 2008. And so it'll be easier to add info from those years. Regards Saadkhan12345 (talk) 21:09, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes, it would be easier to add information afterwards, but, in the meantime, they just add informationless clutter to the page. And so it would probably be better not to add them until they contain info. Merci beaucoup! NHCLS (talk) 21:14, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Actually...it also keep the information about elections on constituencies the same. If you remove them, info added later on might be different on one constituency than the other. Saadkhan12345 (talk) 21:26, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Could you please clarify your point? From what I understand, you wish for the info across all ridings to be standard. That is a good idea, however, I don't believe that is sufficient reason to include empty sections. (In fact, if you look at other riding pages from other countries, you should find that they are generally not standardised). Merci beaucoup! NHCLS (talk) 21:31, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Exactly. I know its a good idea...thats why i added them. Saadkhan12345 (talk) 21:39, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
It is a good idea, but my point is that good ideas are still only ideas - they do not necessarily make good practice. I believe this is the case here. Merci beaucoup! NHCLS (talk) 22:14, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Hey do you think the following makes good practice
Constituency. I have added "empty sections" under G.e 2013 and 2008. Can you please check them out and give me some feedback as to whether make the other const. like that or remove the entire general election section. (im going to add to those empty sections later -on my to-do list-). Saadkhan12345 (talk) 12:48, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi, although I do prefer not to have any empty sections, adding that tag does constitute good practice (n my opion). HOwever, you might want to check with another editor, just in case... Merci beaucoup! NHCLS (talk) 14:11, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

How to join Wikiteam?[edit]

Hello NHCLS, I would like to know something: How do you join the Wiki team for the Editing and removing stuff? I would like to join.

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Hi, I'm Qwertyus. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Praveet Dara, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 18:44, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Story of The Odyssey[edit]

Read the description: "...an article about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organized event that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject". That does not apply to the page Story of The Odyssey. You could have applied A10 (duplicate), or G12 (copyvio). Please read the criteria for speedy deletion, and apply them appropriately. Swpbtalk 21:22, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about that... Merci beaucoup! NHCLS (talk) 21:24, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Our lady of victory fort erie[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Our lady of victory fort erie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://portal.niagaracatholic.ca/elementary/ourladyofvictory/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —C.Fred (talk) 03:06, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your message[edit]

Hi, I got User talk:Howicus#I have unreviewed a page you curated this message from you, and I'm not sure why. Is it an automated part of the page curation tool? Howicus (Did I mess up?) 01:23, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Page Deletion[edit]

Why did you deleted my page bruh?

Hello. I didn't actually delete the page myself (I'm not an admin). However, I did nominate it for speedy deletion. I did this because it has no content. An article needs to have some sort of content for it to actually be an article. (I assume your referring to the David Lauzier page). If you add some good quality content (with reliable sources), there is no reason why the page shouldn't be deleted. Of course, I would be happy to help. (And don't forget to sign your posts!) Merci beaucoup! NHCLS (talk) 18:56, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mingle2[edit]

Can you describe why you asked for a speedy deletion of mingle2? There are no promotional content, instead describe what this product does. What part of the content was considered promotional? How is that different than any other wiki pages describing a product such as plentyoffish, okcupid, match, etcetc? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Badddddbunny (talkcontribs) 01:34, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi. I replaced the speedy deletion tag on the Mingle2 page, not because I necessarily believe that the page is promotional, but instead because the tag had been removed by an editor with one edit (the removal of the tag). The user in question is Randy043015. I replaced the speedy deletion tag in order that an admin can review the page and decide if it is worth keeping. I hope you understand my reasoning... (And don't forget to sign your posts!) Merci beaucoup! NHCLS (talk) 01:46, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Martin Dannenberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page America (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Into the Bermuda Triangle for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Into the Bermuda Triangle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Into the Bermuda Triangle until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GermanJoe (talk) 19:29, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

frustrated[edit]

all my articles are being deleted. --DonLandry2 (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello NHCLS. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3),or significance (CSD A7) moments after they are created, as you did at Die Dame (The Lady) Magazine. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. Eeekster (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)