User talk:Nado158

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Nado158, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Joaquin008 (talk) 10:53, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

WikiThanks[edit]

WikiThanks

In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.7.141 (talk) 23:19, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you!--Nado158 (talk) 13:11, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you[edit]

Modest Barnstar.png The Modest Barnstar
You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this past month! 67.80.64.128 (talk) 22:46, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

An award for you[edit]

A Barnstar!
Golden Wiki Award

Thanks for your recent contributions! 67.80.64.128 (talk) 01:38, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Republika Srpska[edit]

I see you fellas have been having trouble on Republika Srpska. I've requested semi-protection for the article [1], and, just for being so dilligent in your efforts - have a Barnstar :). -- Director (talk) 13:09, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar of Reversion Hires.png The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Awarded for persistent efforts against IP vandalism -- Director (talk) 13:09, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
The IP user has been blocked. In the future I recommend you bring such obvious vandalism to the attentions of the admins immediately. Regards -- Director (talk) 14:11, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much :). Ok, i will do. Regards --Nado158 (talk) 18:34, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar to Nado158[edit]

Working Man's Barnstar.png The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
For your continuos contributions to Serbian football related articles, I award you this barnstar, FkpCascais (talk) 03:31, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Competition icons[edit]

Hi, I suggest you read MOS:ICON, which says that icons should not be used simply for decoration, especially when the point is made perfectly well with text on its own. People know what the European Cup is without needing a crappy little icon of its trophy (which is copyrighted, by the way!). Therefore, please stop reverting me and leave the page as it was. – PeeJay 17:43, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

For what we have then the icons?--Nado158 (talk) 18:08, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
We don't have them, Wikimedia Commons has them. Some of the wikis in other languages use them, but we do not. – PeeJay 18:48, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Ok bro--Nado158 (talk) 18:54, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

List of association football rivalries[edit]

Your reverting of my removal of unsourced Serbian rivalries and the comments you made in the edit summaries was unhelpful. However, I see you have since added a couple of references, so presumably you're well aware of WP:V and WP:N as key foundations of Wikipedia, and have in some way acknowledged the point I was making. Can I ask that you cite the remaining Serbian references please, and they should really be independent sources. I have no agenda against Serbian teams, and deleted a number of other unsourced rivalries as well. Please tone down your edit summaries and if you have things to say use the article or user talk page instead. Thanks. Eldumpo (talk) 20:31, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I am not Arab. What made you think that? OK, happy for you to find appropriate sources for those Serbian rivalries in due course, but don't make it too open-ended. By the way, what is 'achi'? Eldumpo (talk) 21:01, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Ako si[edit]

Ako si Srbin molim te pokušaj da poništiš ustašku propgandu koja svepristuna na osetljivim temama vezanim za srbiju i hrvatsku,primer za to je zemun gde se ističe njegovo hrvatstvo kroz nepouzdane izvore kao što je povijest hrvatske.jer ja ću biti blokiran vrlo brzo.

24.135.72.236 (talk) 10:45, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Ja sam vec blokiran i zabranjeno mi je t radi na tim temema--Nado158 (talk) 11:06, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Da li je korisnik Peacemaker Hrvat?Ne mogu da smislim neko drugo objašnjenje zašto je brisao rezultate popisa i dobronamerne komentare? Znam da korisnici poput šokac prvi drugi .ivanos, joy i ostali jesu. 24.135.72.236 (talk) 14:55, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Jeste, svi su Hrvati brate!--Nado158 (talk) 17:14, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Vidim,a kad pogledam teme koje ih interesuju i koje uređuju mogu da pretpostavim zašto su napravili korisnički nalog. 24.135.72.236 (talk) 07:34, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Tacno! Brate dajem ti jeda predlog, prikljuci se nama i napravi i ti nalog, bilo bi lepo ;).--Nado158 (talk) 11:30, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Ubrzo će se pojaviti dotični peacemaker koji će me optužiti po milioniti put da sam sockupuppet od korisnika sa kojim nemam baš nikakve veze,već sam pravio naloge.da li je se može verovati izvoru kao pto je povijest hrvatske da li je ona uloga navodnog marka skoblića istinita ili je možda preuveličana ili skroz izmišljena kako bi pretpostavljam dokazali njegovo hrvtastvo,možda preterujem što brišem jer s enajbolje ne razumem,ali je jako sumnjiv izvor,neki drugi itvori za zemun kao što je rhvatska reč i ostalo u kojima se između ostalog sugeriše da hrvati bili većina do polovine dvadeset veka a da su ih možeš verovati srbi proterali i tada i u devedesetim.takođe još jedno uznemirajuću činjenica dodali su među znamenite fudbalske klubove iz zemuna neke hrvatske koji su navodno zabranjeni posle drugog svetskog rata ,jadni ni krivi ni dužna i samo zbog činjenice da su hrvatski i eto slučajno su učestvovali u fudbalskom "natjecanju" NDH(koja je okupirala srem i zemun).te stranice još uvek postoje ali se srećom ne pominju na stranici zemun jer sam to obrisao a oni su odustali od toga.ja živim u zemunu i bio sam ružno iznenađen onim što sam mogao da pročitam na hrvatskoj vikipediji o zemunu,ali sam onda shvatio da su oni prešli i na englesku.

Isto mi je bilo čudno to šta sam mogao da pročitam na stranici Kosovo polje jer na primer u članku piše da su neki srbi ubijeni iako su bili umereni(pretpostavljam da to znači lojalni albanskim vlastima),a onda na stranici za razgovor neki albanac/albanka pišu kako engleska vikipedija laže i optužuje je za srpsku propgandu a kako sam/sama kaže oni nisu nikog ubijali i činili zločine a zatim piše "nije zločin ubiti srbe jer oni ovde ne pripadaju"!

Opet ne razumem se najbolje ali muslimani u sandžaku/raškoj nisu ljudi poreklkom iz bosne i hercegovine radi se o srbima koji su primili islam,kakve veze imaju sa bosnom?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HŠK_Zemun mislim na stranice poput ovih koje ne navode nikakve izvore ,samo navodne rezultate. Mislim to razmišljanje mi je donekle razumljivo od kada je zemun izdvojen od vojvodine i pripojen beogradu on se "srozao",znači to treba razumeti ovako da bi u zemunu ponovo cvetalo cveće treba ga vratiti sremu srem vojvodini a vojvodinu hrvtaskoj,onda ć će mu biti bolje. :)

što se tiče popisa takođe razumem da im smeta,jer popisi pokazuju da je broj hrvata u srbiji i vojvodini sve manji,a broj srba malo veći.na primer hrvata nema 80 već 48 hiljada,očigledno da žele da prikažu kako ih je mnogo više nego što ih zaista ima. Bunjevci su prikazani kao Hrvati uključujući i zvonka bogdana,primer kako su aktivni.na žalost ja to ne mogu da promenim jer ću biti blokiran bilo kao registrovan korisnik ili ne jer neko od njih stalno motri te članke.

24.135.72.236 (talk) 14:43, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Brate, sve ja tebe razumem ali ja sam pod zabranom upravo to sto sam se borio za istinu a ne za neku propagandu kao drugi protiv nas. Moras da znas da nam ovde pisu drugi istroiju i da vladaju velike bitke izmedju mnogih grupa ovde. Ovde je velika propaganda na nama i nekim drugim nacijama....nisi ni svestan. Velika je propaganda nad nama. Tim izvorima netrebas verovati, i bez tih izvora naprimer ja znam istinu i istroiju o Zemunu itd. I znaj da je sve to laz i da se sve to radi portiv nas. Misli da je normalno da Albanci i Hrvati vise cesto na nasim stranama i pisu o nasoj istoriji itd. SVe to bez interesa itd? Neznam, ja mislim da nije? Mogu samo da ti preporucujem da se vratis pod nalogom i da naucios upravo kako se ovde zaista radi itd i tako da budes koristan i to mnogo. Slozi sa nasima ovde itd, iako je smo malo nas ovde opstalo jel ovde vlada velika nepravda nad nama.--Nado158 (talk) 19:21, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Uopšte ne mogu da razumem tu količinu prosto neobjašnjive mržnje,primer danas mi je jedna čovek hrvat na stranici na facebooku o kojoj se poziva na nasilj i linč nad srbima zbog uvođenja ćirilice u vukovaru da sam "cigan" "da se nabijem na kurac" "da sam se usro od straha" "kukavička pička" "otpad čovečanstva" "treba vas istrebiti" "dobićeš kurac u oko",potpuno sam zgrožen bio jer mi niko tako nikad nije rekao ili napisao.čovek me zapravo i ne zna.ali ne znam da li je ovaj marko skoblić stvarna ličnost ili je možda njegova uloga preuveličana zaista ne znam takod a neću da diram ali se vrlo često koriste sumnjivi izvori,to je tačno 24.135.72.236 (talk) 20:01, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Nijedna vikipedija nema članak o dotičnom marku skobliću čak ni rhvatska a ne znam koliko su drugi hrvatski izvori poverljivi.tako da može biti da je istina,ali ne mora da znači. 24.135.72.236 (talk) 20:56, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

1.) Nije istina. 2.) Koliko god da si dobar, to se nece nazalost promenuti (to je tako i nema tu sta da razumes) i ovde se radi protiv nas za mnogo propagande. To je tako, nazalost. Sta ostaje, gledaj svoju stranu i bori se za svoje i za pravud, ako ne? bice samo jos gore. Ostalo sam ti objasnio. Ako oces da pomognes oko pravde, istine itd. rekao sam sta da radis. Podzrav--Nado158 (talk) 23:19, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of FK Partizan strip for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FK Partizan strip is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FK Partizan strip until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 13:02, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Uspeli smo[edit]

Uspeli smo! Partizanov clanak je dobio GA status. Glavni cilj je ispunjen. Sada ostaju da se urede i popune podclanci. Inace, hvala ti puno na pomoci i nadam se da cemo i u buduce saradjivati :) Pozdrav druze! (Nightwolf87 (talk) 10:40, 4 June 2013 (UTC))

Pa to je savrseno :)! Bilo mi je cast da pomognem, da saradjujemo i da sam deo toga. Hvala i tebi. Zao mi je sto nisam mogao da pomognem ovi zadnjih trenutaka. Sa moje strane cemo i u buducnosti sigurno saradjivati ;) Veliki pozdrav druze!--Nado158 (talk) 18:11, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Hehe na zdravlje! Hoce da uklone GA status jer clanak ima puno gramatickih gresaka i mnoge stvari nemaju izvore. Mora da se popravlja :( Nismo rodjeni Englezi pa da znamo sve do detalja. Nijedan od nas nije native speaker. Mozda FKPCascais zna bolje gramatiku. (Nightwolf87 (talk) 09:29, 5 June 2013 (UTC))

FK Partizan Good Article Reassessment[edit]

FK Partizan, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. C679 08:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, but also, look at the diff[edit]

I'm sorry, I didn't see I'd removed your comment. You removed a big chunk of text from the previous request in that edit. Now I see Sean Hoyland has fixed everything. Sorry for not reading the diff all the way down.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 16:33, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

No problem. Best wishes :)--Nado158 (talk) 16:34, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Barnstar[edit]

Barnstar of Humour3.png The Barnstar of Good Humor
You crack me up mate. Kind regards from Yorkshire! IJA (talk) 22:42, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Enforcement of your TBAN at AE[edit]

G'day Nado158, just notifying you that I have asked for enforcement of discretionary sanctions against you for violating your TBAN with recent edits, including this one. See WP:AE for more details. Regards, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 12:55, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Blocked per the AE complaint for violation of your topic ban from Serbia[edit]

To enforce an arbitration decision you have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 


Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted a procedure instructing administrators as follows: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

The full report is at the AE noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 21:01, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Nado158. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)