Trout this user

User talk:Narutolovehinata5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Busy desk.svg This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
The Signpost
6 February 2017

Please leave a new message below this line. Remember to add a section heading. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

  • Also, if you are asking why I tagged your page for deletion, just leave a new message below the "Talk Page" thing. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 07:40, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Please add new sections below this line. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:46, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Lanka BBC[edit] Bro Please Help My To Rewrite

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Narutolovehinata5. You have new messages at Rahi1998's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Unfortunately there is nothing I can do about the article. The company does not appear to meet our notability guidelines and thus cannot be included in the encyclopedia. Please read WP:NCORP for more information. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Help Me[edit]

Thanks Please Help To Full Fill This Article Narutolovehinata5 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahi1998 (talkcontribs) 03:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Narutolovehinata5. You have new messages at Rahi1998's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

please help me i crate this article more than 20 times but you are blocking my article why what i do for you

@Rahi1998: Wikipedia has inclusion guidelines for what can and cannot be included in the encyclopedia. One of these guidelines is that the topic of the article must have been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources; that is, there are sources (online or offline) by reliable sources (what constitutes a reliable source is determined on a case-by-case basis, but a good rule of thumb is that the source is an authority on the field, and/or said source is also considered reliable by others in the field). Based on what I could find, this BBC Lanka appears not to have been covered by such sources, and in fact, I can find little-to-no evidence that this company is even an actual television station like what is claimed in the article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

I'm just trying to get my page back. It was valid, and meet guidelines. It was up for three years. Please restore it

page was - Emit Artist Emit - Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emitdfatt (talkcontribs) 23:17, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

@Emitdfatt: What was the URL of the original article? I can't find it in the deletion log. But in any case, you accidentally posted your asking for help as an article, and thus the page has to be deleted. You may instead post your question on the help desk or at the Wikipedia:Teahouse. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:22, 12 January 2017 (UTC)


I apologize. I am unfamiliar with Wiki and message and requests. My page was deleted by @JgZ... the reason was because the author was blocked or deleted which is irrelevant because my page was thee years old with valid content. Not sure what that user did recently, but that's irrelevant to my page.

Thanks for your help

Emit - Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emitdfatt (talkcontribs) 23:37, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

@Emitdfatt: I think it would be best for you to contact JzG directly then. Leave them a message on their talk page. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:41, 12 January 2017 (UTC)


What does it mean when you review an article? Thank you The Kingfisher (talk) 08:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

@The Kingfisher: It's a simple check to allow articles, particularly newly-created ones, to be indexed by search engines such as Google. It also serves as a rough check for newpage patrollers to see if a newly-created article meets inclusion guidelines or has been nominated for deletion. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you The Kingfisher (talk) 20:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

List of Chinese leaders in the international organizations[edit]

This may not necessarily strictly meet the no content CSD criteria. Please feel free to revert my tag and PROD it (or AFD it) if you think that's more appropriate, because I'm not particularly sure about it. I was musing over it when I noticed you'd made the AFD. Cheers, Matthew Thompson talk to me! 16:31, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

@Thompson.matthew: Let an admin decide what to do with the article. If an admin decides that the article does meet A3 and deletes it then so be it. If an admin declines the speedy nomination then that would be the time for AFD. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 16:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
No worries. Matthew Thompson talk to me! 16:38, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Myth & Roid[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 18 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Myth & Roid, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the name of the musical unit Myth & Roid comes from words representing the past and the future? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Myth & Roid. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Myth & Roid), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:01, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Yetiforce on Wikipedia[edit]

Dear Narutolovehinata5, Thank you for your service in reviewing entries. The company I work with and for myself personally, this is our first time submitting an entry into Wikipedia. So I would kindly ask for your assistance in helping us understand what we need to change so that the appropriate information about our company is included in Wikipedia. My understanding is that there is not coverage about our software is this correct? Also if I understand well, it seems one other observer feels we made a statement that is advertisement. Is this the link to the Yetiforce store, "and paid support, available in the form of support packages sold in the store." I am really trying to learn, so I hope this is not to amateurish to ask these kinds of questions. Thank you and I hope to hear from you soon. Benjaminburg (talk) 22:12, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

My page was removed[edit]

I was testing the watchful population on how fast they would take down an addition if it was red or blue.

I also have a hard time taking you serious in a professional manner with a username of that sort. I also looked through your likes and dislikes. I found an astonishing amount of information I would never want revealed if I was the monitor for this well known website. That is enough of my ranting. (I am not against anime, just over sharing of any type of personal information) Robbertcorrick (talk) 06:56, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Response User talk:Benjaminburg[edit]

Hello Again, thank you for quick response. I think we handled the change with COI. I hope.

Just so I can learn more. Would you mind explaining in your opinion why companies like SuiteCRM and Epesi pass the notability condition? Can you please explain the difference.

Benjaminburg (talk) 11:54, 20 January 2017 (UTC)Thank you

@Benjaminburg: Right now that article is severely lacking in references, but a search proves that in the case of SuiteCRM at least it has been covered by reliable sources such as, Datamation, and Enterprise Apps Today. These hits appear to be independent of the company, meaning these pages were not written to promote or advertise, and were written by third-parties. In the case of your company, coverage by third-parties, let alone reliable ones, is sorely lacking. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Happy Birthday![edit]

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Hi, I'm DrStrauss. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, New Binary Press, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. DrStrauss talk 19:15, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

DrStrauss talk 19:15, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

UPDATE - re-curated it with inline citation tags. DrStrauss talk 20:08, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Happy Birthday[edit]

CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:55, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Hi, I'm Meiloorun. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Vaddiparti prabhakar, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 05:38, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Reference errors on 4 February[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of D.Gray-man[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of D.Gray-man at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:39, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.2[edit]

Hello Narutolovehinata5,
Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg
A HUGE backlog

We now have 348 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.

Hitting 17,000 soon

The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.

Second set of eyes

Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.


This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and

  1. this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
  2. this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
  3. This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election[edit]

Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

scryed ga[edit]

Is there another issue with the article's state? A copyeditor made some tweaks yesterday. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 21:17, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for D.Gray-man[edit]

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Answer to the: "Speedy deletion nomination of Arcticus System AB[edit source]"

I intend to fix the page according to the Wiki's criteria, however, i was just creating some pointers.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article. You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles. A tag has been placed on Arcticus System AB requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alessio.bucaioni (talkcontribs)


As the original GA reviewer of the article D.Gray-man, do you think it lacks something besides copyediting (I requested the guild some weeks ago) before becoming a FA? I will try to make this article FA. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 18:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

@Tintor2: I would suggest you read the article School Rumble and use that article as a basis for the article. D.Gray-man is a well-written article, but while it's comprehensive at the moment, it's not ready for FA just yet. One suggestion I can give right now is for you to look for sources regarding the anime's production: how was an anime adaptation suggested? Why was one made? How were the characters cast? What went into the production of the anime? In addition, could the "books" and "video games" sections be expanded further, if possible? Lastly, and this is something I learned during the peer reviews for Puella Magi Madoka Magica: a wider variety sources should be used, particularly Japanese ones. While using primarily ANN is acceptable up to GA status, beyond that, relying too much on that source is seen as a flaw. At the moment, around half of the article's references cite ANN; it would probably be a good idea to add non-ANN citations as well to bring that proportion down. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 22:43, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. The 9th volume of the manga has info about the making of the first anime. Where should I put it? In anime adaptations? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

@Tintor2: Production section, possibly in a subsection titled "anime". Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:00, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Due to finding info for only one paragraph, I guess I shouldn't create a subsection.Tintor2 (talk) 01:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Also, I tried reducing the use of ANN in sales' section. However, ANN is the only site that posts news about the hiatus.Tintor2 (talk) 16:10, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
@Tintor2: If ANN is the only source that's available, then feel free to use it. Just avoid using it all the time, especially if other sources can be used. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 16:11, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections[edit]

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.3[edit]

Hello Narutolovehinata5,
Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg

Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.

Still a MASSIVE backlog

We now have 348 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)


Hi. I nominated the article mentioned for GAN. If you have the time, I would like to ask if you would review it. If you can't, please reply. Thanks. MCMLXXXIX 18:16, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

@1989: Thank you for the interest but unfortunately I'm currently busy with real-life matters so I cannot do the review at this time. If you wish, you may leave a message at WT:ANIME and ask any of the other users there if they are willing to review the article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 22:29, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
It's alright. Someone already reviewed it. I also wanted to let you know that the main character of the series is nominated for an FA promotion. When you get a chance, could you give feedback? MCMLXXXIX 22:31, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
@1989: Sure. I can take a look at the article right now if you want. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:34, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. If you can, could you have a look at this FLC? MCMLXXXIX 10:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

is this really unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company ???[edit]

is this really unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company ???

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because it contains only factual information and quotes of interest to researchers of the company, its history and products.Luminous Industries Australia (talk) 22:52, 22 February 2017 (UTC)