Trout this user.

User talk:Narutolovehinata5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Busy desk.svg This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
The Signpost
25 September 2017

Please leave a new message below this line. Remember to add a section heading. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

  • Also, if you are asking why I tagged your page for deletion, just leave a new message below the "Talk Page" thing. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 07:40, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Please add new sections below this line. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:46, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Contents

Lanka BBC[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanka_BBC Bro Please Help My To Rewrite

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Narutolovehinata5. You have new messages at Rahi1998's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Unfortunately there is nothing I can do about the article. The company does not appear to meet our notability guidelines and thus cannot be included in the encyclopedia. Please read WP:NCORP for more information. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Help Me[edit]

Thanks Please Help To Full Fill This Article Narutolovehinata5 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahi1998 (talkcontribs) 03:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Help[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Narutolovehinata5. You have new messages at Rahi1998's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

please help me i crate this article more than 20 times but you are blocking my article why what i do for you

@Rahi1998: Wikipedia has inclusion guidelines for what can and cannot be included in the encyclopedia. One of these guidelines is that the topic of the article must have been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources; that is, there are sources (online or offline) by reliable sources (what constitutes a reliable source is determined on a case-by-case basis, but a good rule of thumb is that the source is an authority on the field, and/or said source is also considered reliable by others in the field). Based on what I could find, this BBC Lanka appears not to have been covered by such sources, and in fact, I can find little-to-no evidence that this company is even an actual television station like what is claimed in the article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

I'm just trying to get my page back. It was valid, and meet guidelines. It was up for three years. Please restore it

page was - Emit Artist Emit - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emitdfatt (talkcontribs) 23:17, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

@Emitdfatt: What was the URL of the original article? I can't find it in the deletion log. But in any case, you accidentally posted your asking for help as an article, and thus the page has to be deleted. You may instead post your question on the help desk or at the Wikipedia:Teahouse. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:22, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Undelete[edit]

I apologize. I am unfamiliar with Wiki and message and requests. My page was deleted by @JgZ... the reason was because the author was blocked or deleted which is irrelevant because my page was thee years old with valid content. Not sure what that user did recently, but that's irrelevant to my page.

Thanks for your help

Emit - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emitdfatt (talkcontribs) 23:37, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

@Emitdfatt: I think it would be best for you to contact JzG directly then. Leave them a message on their talk page. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:41, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Reviewed[edit]

What does it mean when you review an article? Thank you The Kingfisher (talk) 08:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

@The Kingfisher: It's a simple check to allow articles, particularly newly-created ones, to be indexed by search engines such as Google. It also serves as a rough check for newpage patrollers to see if a newly-created article meets inclusion guidelines or has been nominated for deletion. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you The Kingfisher (talk) 20:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

List of Chinese leaders in the international organizations[edit]

This may not necessarily strictly meet the no content CSD criteria. Please feel free to revert my tag and PROD it (or AFD it) if you think that's more appropriate, because I'm not particularly sure about it. I was musing over it when I noticed you'd made the AFD. Cheers, Matthew Thompson talk to me! 16:31, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

@Thompson.matthew: Let an admin decide what to do with the article. If an admin decides that the article does meet A3 and deletes it then so be it. If an admin declines the speedy nomination then that would be the time for AFD. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 16:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
No worries. Matthew Thompson talk to me! 16:38, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Myth & Roid[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 18 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Myth & Roid, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the name of the musical unit Myth & Roid comes from words representing the past and the future? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Myth & Roid. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Myth & Roid), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:01, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Yetiforce on Wikipedia[edit]

Dear Narutolovehinata5, Thank you for your service in reviewing entries. The company I work with and for myself personally, this is our first time submitting an entry into Wikipedia. So I would kindly ask for your assistance in helping us understand what we need to change so that the appropriate information about our company is included in Wikipedia. My understanding is that there is not coverage about our software is this correct? Also if I understand well, it seems one other observer feels we made a statement that is advertisement. Is this the link to the Yetiforce store, "and paid support, available in the form of support packages sold in the store." I am really trying to learn, so I hope this is not to amateurish to ask these kinds of questions. Thank you and I hope to hear from you soon. Benjaminburg (talk) 22:12, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

My page was removed[edit]

I was testing the watchful population on how fast they would take down an addition if it was red or blue.




I also have a hard time taking you serious in a professional manner with a username of that sort. I also looked through your likes and dislikes. I found an astonishing amount of information I would never want revealed if I was the monitor for this well known website. That is enough of my ranting. (I am not against anime, just over sharing of any type of personal information) Robbertcorrick (talk) 06:56, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Response User talk:Benjaminburg[edit]

Hello Again, thank you for quick response. I think we handled the change with COI. I hope.

Just so I can learn more. Would you mind explaining in your opinion why companies like SuiteCRM and Epesi pass the notability condition? Can you please explain the difference.

Benjaminburg (talk) 11:54, 20 January 2017 (UTC)Thank you

@Benjaminburg: Right now that article is severely lacking in references, but a search proves that in the case of SuiteCRM at least it has been covered by reliable sources such as Opensource.org, Datamation, and Enterprise Apps Today. These hits appear to be independent of the company, meaning these pages were not written to promote or advertise, and were written by third-parties. In the case of your company, coverage by third-parties, let alone reliable ones, is sorely lacking. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Happy Birthday![edit]

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Hi, I'm DrStrauss. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, New Binary Press, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. DrStrauss talk 19:15, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

DrStrauss talk 19:15, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

UPDATE - re-curated it with inline citation tags. DrStrauss talk 20:08, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Happy Birthday[edit]

CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:55, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Hi, I'm Meiloorun. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Vaddiparti prabhakar, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 05:38, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Reference errors on 4 February[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of D.Gray-man[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of D.Gray-man at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:39, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.2[edit]

Hello Narutolovehinata5,
Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg
A HUGE backlog

We now have 483 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.

Hitting 17,000 soon

The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.

Second set of eyes

Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.

Abuse

This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and

  1. this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
  2. this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
  3. This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election[edit]

Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.


Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

scryed ga[edit]

Is there another issue with the article's state? A copyeditor made some tweaks yesterday. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 21:17, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for D.Gray-man[edit]

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 7 February 2017 (UTC)


Answer to the: "Speedy deletion nomination of Arcticus System AB[edit source]"

I intend to fix the page according to the Wiki's criteria, however, i was just creating some pointers.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article. You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles. A tag has been placed on Arcticus System AB requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alessio.bucaioni (talkcontribs)

D.Gray-man[edit]

As the original GA reviewer of the article D.Gray-man, do you think it lacks something besides copyediting (I requested the guild some weeks ago) before becoming a FA? I will try to make this article FA. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 18:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

@Tintor2: I would suggest you read the article School Rumble and use that article as a basis for the article. D.Gray-man is a well-written article, but while it's comprehensive at the moment, it's not ready for FA just yet. One suggestion I can give right now is for you to look for sources regarding the anime's production: how was an anime adaptation suggested? Why was one made? How were the characters cast? What went into the production of the anime? In addition, could the "books" and "video games" sections be expanded further, if possible? Lastly, and this is something I learned during the peer reviews for Puella Magi Madoka Magica: a wider variety sources should be used, particularly Japanese ones. While using primarily ANN is acceptable up to GA status, beyond that, relying too much on that source is seen as a flaw. At the moment, around half of the article's references cite ANN; it would probably be a good idea to add non-ANN citations as well to bring that proportion down. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 22:43, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. The 9th volume of the manga has info about the making of the first anime. Where should I put it? In anime adaptations? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

@Tintor2: Production section, possibly in a subsection titled "anime". Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:00, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Due to finding info for only one paragraph, I guess I shouldn't create a subsection.Tintor2 (talk) 01:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Also, I tried reducing the use of ANN in sales' section. However, ANN is the only site that posts news about the hiatus.Tintor2 (talk) 16:10, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
@Tintor2: If ANN is the only source that's available, then feel free to use it. Just avoid using it all the time, especially if other sources can be used. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 16:11, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections[edit]

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.3[edit]

Hello Narutolovehinata5,
Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg

Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.

Still a MASSIVE backlog

We now have 483 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.


Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Naruto[edit]

Hi. I nominated the article mentioned for GAN. If you have the time, I would like to ask if you would review it. If you can't, please reply. Thanks. MCMLXXXIX 18:16, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

@1989: Thank you for the interest but unfortunately I'm currently busy with real-life matters so I cannot do the review at this time. If you wish, you may leave a message at WT:ANIME and ask any of the other users there if they are willing to review the article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 22:29, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
It's alright. Someone already reviewed it. I also wanted to let you know that the main character of the series is nominated for an FA promotion. When you get a chance, could you give feedback? MCMLXXXIX 22:31, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
@1989: Sure. I can take a look at the article right now if you want. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:34, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. If you can, could you have a look at this FLC? MCMLXXXIX 10:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

is this really unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company ???[edit]

is this really unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company ???

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophecysound_Systems

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because it contains only factual information and quotes of interest to researchers of the company, its history and products.Luminous Industries Australia (talk) 22:52, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Did you know[edit]

Greetings. I've been following the Did you know guidelines but I couldn't find what to do until reaching the limits of DYK after reaching the maximum. Could you tell me? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 15:08, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

@Tintor2: As long as you currently don't have more than five DYK nominations you should be fine. However, once you have exceeded five DYK nominations, for every nomination you make, you must review at least one other DYK nomination: this is called quid pro quo. You can read the guidelines on how to review DYK hooks over at WP:DYK. Although you are still exempt from QPQ at this point, I suggest that you start doing QPQ reviews now so that by the time you are required to do QPQ reviews, it would already be a habit. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 16:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. I guess I'll try it when nominating Millennium Earl to GA. Sadly, it will take a while due to the time it will take to be copyedited considering not even my first request wasn't copyedited yet. By the way, do you think the article's name is okay or it should be "The Millennium Earl"? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 00:27, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
@Tintor2: I haven't watched or read D.Gray-man so I don't know, but as far as I know character names almost never start with "The" so I guess "Millenium Earl" should be the correct article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

yeah i think so too[edit]

i think its wikipedia Kor... but i had a mistake.. i thought this site is wikipedia KOR..my mistake.. jang8962 (talk · contribs)

Gamar Malamo Airport page reviewing.[edit]

Hi there Narutolovehinata5. A very big thank you for reviewing my page Gamar Malamo Airport. FlyJet777 (talk) 12:14, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Miyu Tomita[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 15 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Miyu Tomita, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Japanese voice actress Miyu Tomita was a member of her school's manga research club? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Miyu Tomita. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Miyu Tomita), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Unreviewed Article – The Montserrat Reporter[edit]

Hello. You reviewed a newly created article for me in the past, and I wanted to know if it would be possible for you to review another newly article that I've created. It's The Montserrat Reporter and has been unreviewed for almost a month. Would you happen to know why it has taken so long for the article to be reviewed? Appreciate your help. Oriole7 (talk) 11:00, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

@Oriole7:  Done. As a favor, could you also review the article Miyu Tomita? I created it more than a week ago and it's even been featured on DYK, but it hasn't been reviewed yet. Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:07, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
@Narutolovehinata5: Thanks for taking a look at the article. I wish I could, but I am not an admin so I do not know how to review articles. If it's not too much to ask, I created Warren Cassell Jr. yesterday as well. Could you take a look? I'm not sure what's causing the backlog. Oriole7 (talk) 11:53, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
@Oriole7: You can request for the New Page Reviewer right. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:57, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

User pages[edit]

Apparently I forgot how to make user pages :P Ethanbas (talk) 05:59, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Help! :)[edit]

Hi! I'm the creator of the Center for the Integration and Advancement of New Americans page that was recently flagged for deletion. I was wondering if you had any suggestions as to what I could do in order to make my article adhere to Wikipedia's standards? This is my first article, so I'm still trying to figure this out! CIANA (talk) 15:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Unfortunately, the article cannot remain on Wikipedia, as it appears that the organization does not meet our notability guidelines (you can read more at WP:NORG). In addition, it appears that you have a conflict of interest, which generally means you should as much as possible refrain from contributing to Wikipedia anything that you may have a connection with. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:50, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

I need a file uploading[edit]

Hi, I need the world of sport wrestling logo uploading as I'm not allowed to upload at this point. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wraymaster66 (talkcontribs) 19:23, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Maon Kurosaki[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Maon Kurosaki you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tintor2 -- Tintor2 (talk) 14:41, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Maon Kurosaki[edit]

The article Maon Kurosaki you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Maon Kurosaki for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tintor2 -- Tintor2 (talk) 01:02, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Kindly help me to delete the page[edit]

Dear Sir,

   Thanks a lot for noticing my new template - টেমপ্লেট:অসমাধিত. Actually, I made a mistake creating this template , which I should make in bn.wikipedia.org. How can I delete this page?

Thanking you,

Sincerely, P.Shiladitya — Preceding unsigned comment added by P.Shiladitya (talkcontribs) 05:16, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

@P.Shiladitya: You can add the {{db-g7}} template to the page, signifying that, as the page's creator, you request that the page will be deleted. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:56, 29 March 2017 (UTC)


@Narutolovehinata5: Thanks a lot sir. P.Shiladitya (talkcontribs)

+ The Guidance Barnstar[edit]

Compass barnstar.png The Guidance Barnstar
Thank you for all your gentle guidance and help for this new editor. Shirt58 (talk) 10:03, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:22, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Thanks for reviewing 公主誕, Narutolovehinata5.

Unfortunately Mabalu has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Unreviewing so that if the speedy delete tag is removed again it won't slip through into the system as a reviewed article.

To reply, leave a comment on Mabalu's talk page.

Mabalu (talk) 10:16, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Apologies for this, I know it's really annoying to get these automated notices but there seems no way to turn them off, which seems necessary for uncontroversial unreviewings such as this. Mabalu (talk) 10:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Millennium Earl GAR[edit]

Greetings. If it is possible and you have free time, could you review Millennium Earl? It's a small article that I recently nominated. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 23:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

I've already taken a look at the article, and to make a long story short, it's almost ready. However, the creation and conception section could use more expansion and sources. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:57, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Added a bit more. The problem is that some parts of the character weren't discussed due to future developments of the series such as his true identity.Tintor2 (talk) 01:59, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
If you can find sources discussing said development, then you can add them to the article. Remember that Wikipedia allows spoilers in plot sections, so there's no reason not to includent. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:07, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
No, Hoshino never said things that talk about the series' future. She only said once that Cross Marian might appear in a flashback.Tintor2 (talk) 02:11, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planet Nine[edit]

Ambox warning orange.svg Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planet Nine, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planet Nine and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planet Nine during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 01:26, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Maon Kurosaki[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 10 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Maon Kurosaki, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that prior to her major debut, singer Maon Kurosaki posed as a gravure model for the cover of a novel? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maon Kurosaki. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Maon Kurosaki), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Hi, I'm Vanjagenije. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, 2017 Philippine network television schedule, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Vanjagenije (talk) 11:58, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Himura Kenshin[edit]

I recently expanded the GA Himura Kenshin to make it look like the FAs Allen Walker and Naruto Uzumaki so I made a DYK nomination. Still, I think did too many requests? Could you give me a hand with it? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 22:55, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Machico (singer)[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 18 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Machico (singer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that voice actress and singer Machico made a cameo as herself in the anime television series Seiyu's Life!? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Machico (singer). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Machico (singer)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 00:22, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Leafa/GA1[edit]

Hi there,

In response to your question, I think that if we don't hear from them in the next 24 hours, we should shut down the nomination and fail it. If I have time to review Re:Zero − Starting Life in Another World I will. ISD (talk) 09:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Reviewal pending - Pregnancy in art[edit]

Hey, I just recently created a new article and it is pending for reviewal. Please review. The article is Pregnancy in art.King Prithviraj II (talk) 18:43, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Re:Zero − Starting Life in Another World[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Re:Zero − Starting Life in Another World you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ISD -- ISD (talk) 09:21, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Re:Zero ? Starting Life in Another World[edit]

The article Re:Zero ? Starting Life in Another World you nominated as a good article has failed Symbol oppose vote.svg; see Talk:Re:Zero ? Starting Life in Another World for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ISD -- ISD (talk) 09:22, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Hi, I'm Justlettersandnumbers. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Laws of London, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:52, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Hi, I'm Cahk. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Markus Winter, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Cahk (talk) 08:04, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Re:Zero − Starting Life in Another World[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 5 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Re:Zero − Starting Life in Another World, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the original draft for the light novel series Re:Zero − Starting Life in Another World was over 1,000 pages and had to be significantly cut? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Re:Zero − Starting Life in Another World. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Re:Zero − Starting Life in Another World), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 05:19, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

The Fierra Fly Article[edit]

(Iamthebestthereis (talk) 14:50, 6 May 2017 (UTC)) Hey Naruto san im glad you picked me up off the wikipedia streets lol i was an orphan until i met you...thanks once again but the article i submited meets all 3 wikipedia guidelines veriability neutral point of view and no original research and on top of that the article explains to readers vividly and clearly what the person/topic is and why it is being covered....it complys with and is definitely a credible claim of significance! theres other articles ive overlook with no credible sources or any valid claims of significance and should not even be on wikipedia...yet they are! Help Me Please senpai  :)

@Iamthebestthereis: Please carefully read WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:05, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

(Iamthebestthereis (talk) 23:11, 6 May 2017 (UTC)) ive already looked into that way before i even made the article and Yea what you are saying/did was wrong you got my article deleted when it shouldnt have been marked in the first place..the article i wrote had 3 different third part sources plus references

oh and yea i want/would like the markup data for my particular article that you marked for deletion 45 seconds after i posted it! so i can make adjustments — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamthebestthereis (talkcontribs) 23:23, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank You For Your Review[edit]

Thank you to reviewed my new article Sweet 20 (2017 film). Really appreciate it


Puchicatos (talk) 11:55, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstar of Diligence Hires.png The Barnstar of Diligence
For the fast reviewed in new article Puchicatos (talk) 11:59, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4[edit]

Hello Narutolovehinata5,
Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 483 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Thanks for reviewing PSR J1856+0245, Narutolovehinata5.

Unfortunately Winged Blades of Godric has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Copy-vio...

To reply, leave a comment on Winged Blades of Godric's talk page.

Winged Blades Godric 11:28, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstar of Diligence Hires.png The Barnstar of Diligence
Thanks for reviewing my newly created article so promptly. Regards Yavarai (talk) 11:28, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Madoka Magica[edit]

Hello, Naruto!!! I hope you're doing good. So, I saw you guys wanting to nominate Madoka for FA but it seems that the article is kind of incomplete. I was browsing the Japanese magical girl wiki, and it is written that Madoka has become a social phenomenon in Japan. It's even written in this site: http://uchiagehanabi.jp/ "Magical Girl Madoka ☆ Magica" that has become a social phenomenon" So, I think we should include this in Madoka's article, and we should also expand the article. What do you think? You're the main contributor to the article and this is why I'm complaining to you :) I think we should also invite Artichoker to the discussion. Don't forget to ping me when replying!UnknownUsername480 (talk) 21:36, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Oh, I also forgot to ask you this, but can we split and create an article to Rebellion alone? Check its talk page UnknownUsername480 (talk) 21:43, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Naruto, please, reply. :( UnknownUsername480 (talk) 18:00, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Sorry for the late reply, I was out of town for two days. I think it would be good to see if there's consensus for such a split. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:05, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
It's okay. So, I think you're against the split? And what about the 'social phenomenon' thing? I think it should be added to the main article... UnknownUsername480 (talk) 18:37, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Kind of. We need to see if there's sufficient material and coverage for the Rebellion independent of the franchise to warrant a separate article from the Films article. In addition, if we split Rebellion, we might as well give the other two films their own articles as well. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 22:59, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
Wait, the first two movies can have an article together and we can title it as Puella Magi Madoka Magica the Movie while Rebellion can have its own article since it's an original story unlike the first two. I think I should create it on my sandbox and then you can decide whether to split or not. What do you think of this idea? UnknownUsername480 (talk) 21:39, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Thanks for reviewing Tuangru, Narutolovehinata5.

Unfortunately Chrissymad has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

I have unreviewed Tuangru because it contains copyright violations that need to be addressed.

To reply, leave a comment on Chrissymad's talk page.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:29, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you![edit]

Cup-o-coffee-simple.svg Thanks a lot for reviewing my article promptly. Regards Yavarai (talk) 10:15, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Contesting deletion of my submitted Wiki article[edit]

Hello! I recently posted my first Wikipedia article on 'Dr. Khaled Mahdi,' and after its first deletion, I made some fundamental changes and re-posted it, only to find you had marked it for deletion.

I would like to contest the deletion as I have modelled the page's writing, content, and formatting based on established/accepted Wikipedia biographies of a living person such as Ban Ki Moon's and others (and those are still up). The content is not made up but I have utilised extensive sources and bibliographies and complete information, etc., on this important public figure, and I've stuck as closely to that format as possible, so I don't think there's a reason for its removal (unless you'd like to delete those too of course).

If you still think I need to make any changes I'd sincerely appreciate if you could give me more detailed advice on what needs to be done, otherwise I'd be very grateful if you could kindly restore the page.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Albedo11 (talkcontribs) 21:19, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Thanks for reviewing Herbert H. Harwood, Jr., Narutolovehinata5.

Unfortunately Domdeparis has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Hi I'm sorry but I'm going to have to unreview this page as the author does not meet WP:NAUTHOR. It requires that even if he has created a collective body of work, as is the case here, "such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." and this is not supported by the sources.

To reply, leave a comment on Domdeparis's talk page.

Domdeparis (talk) 12:46, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi just out of curiosity what was your thinking when you reviewed the page without tagging it for improvement ? Domdeparis (talk) 13:06, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Well, I took a look at the article, and at the very least there was a claim to notability so that was good enough for me. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:32, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
You've reviewed several of my settlement entries for South Sudan. Thank you so much for you efforts patrolling new pages! Mr leroy playpus (talk) 10:45, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
I think I only reviewed one South Sudan-related article, though. But thanks for the barnstar. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:47, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Celebrating 9 years of editing[edit]

Balloons-aj.svg Hey, Narutolovehinata5. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
Mz7 (talk) 00:00, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Face-smile.svg

Your recent review of Hayao Miyazaki[edit]

Recently I noticed that you had assessed the article for Hayao Miyazaki and thought to ask if you might have an interest in another Japanese director Akira Kurosawa. I recently did a nomination for him and was wondering if you might glance at the article to see if you or someone you know among the editors might take and interest in possibly assessing this article for Wikipedia. JohnWickTwo (talk) 14:06, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: NBA Youngboy[edit]

Hello Narutolovehinata5. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of NBA Youngboy, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: collaborating with notable rapper indicates significance. Thank you. SoWhy 08:22, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Hayao Miyazaki[edit]

Alex ShihTalk 00:02, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

About Domestic Girlfriend[edit]

Hello sir! I've accidentally moved the Domestic Girlfriend page to List of Domestic Girlfriend chapters, while I'm trying to make a new page for chapter list. But i can't undone it. So can you please fix this problem and create a separate page for chapter list. Phoenix God (talk) 08:16, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Resolved
It appears this was resolved by yourself. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:23, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Hello Narutolovehinata5, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
  • Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

  • Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
  • The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:

General project update:


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Bhadra(भादड़ा) and Badhra[edit]

I believe that these are two separate towns. See https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Bhadra,+Haryana,+India/Badhra,+Haryana,+India/@29.0954723,74.9120364,9z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1s0x3911341e66889681:0x29f59cf960b2700a!2m2!1d75.0596545!2d29.7451757!1m5!1m1!1s0x3912f03171662795:0xf82f2847c92698c1!2m2!1d75.9376146!2d28.5094117!3e0?hl=en, for example, where Google Maps locates them as being a four-hour drive away from each other. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:21, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Seems the two towns are in the same state(?) so confusion does seem possible, though when I initially checked, it seemed that the village referred to in Bhadra(भादड़ा) already had an article here. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:47, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Sharmalakshya[edit]

A tag has been placed on User talk:Sharmalakshya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — fortunavelut luna 15:36, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Thanks for reviewing CCA Global Partners, Narutolovehinata5.

Unfortunately TonyBallioni has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Unreviewing to get more eyes on this: created by CU confirmed sock.

To reply, leave a comment on TonyBallioni's talk page.

TonyBallioni (talk) 04:37, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Inverse Warburg Effect[edit]

Dear Narutolovehinata5

Thank you for your objective evaluation that the article is not promotional. As regards your comment that the article is 'fringe', I am forwarding a message I also sent to Roger Hayworth. In this message I give three links to scientific evaluations of the theory. One of the links is to the Harvard Gazette, two are to European national newspapers. The latter two reports are in German, however, google translations can immediately be accessed.

"The Inverse Warburg effect, as cited in the Wikipedia entry, is an empirical observation which has been documented in studies of neurodegenerative diseases (ref. 1-6) and autoimmune diseases (ref. 17-20). The Inverse Warburg Hypothesis described in a separate Wikipedia Entry provides a biochemical and bioenergetic explanation of the Inverse Warburg effect. The model also accounts for the inverse association of cancer and neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. A significant feature of the model is the new class of therapeutic strategies proposed to prevent certain neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease, and chronic autoimmune diseases, such as arthritis.

The theory has generated attention in the scientific community; reports of this work have appeared in scientific publications and the news media. Pertinent news media references are: - Harvard Gazette, 25th Feb. 2015: “A new understanding of Alzheimer’s”, by Peter Reuell (http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2015/02/a-new-understanding-of-alzheimers/) - Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ), 2nd Aug. 2015 : “Alzheimer: Heilung – wie nah ist man wirklich dran?“, by Joachim Müller-Jung (http://www.faz.net/aktuell/wissen/medizin-ernaehrung/streitgespraech-alzheimer-heilung-wie-nah-ist-man-wirklich-dran-13722068.html?printPagedArticle=true#pageIndex_2) - Neue Züricher Zeitung (NZZ), 21st Feb. 2015: „Alzheimer – Sind die Forscher auf dem Irrweg?“, by Theres Lüthi (https://www.nzz.ch/nzzas/nzz-am-sonntag/gegen-alzheimer-gibt-es-noch-immer-kein-medikament--weil-die-forscher-auf-dem-irrweg-sind-1.18483526)"

With best regards, and thanks again for your assessment

                                                        Cordula (Hasperasperagus)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hasperasperagus (talkcontribs) 07:34, 30 July 2017 (UTC) 

P.S. Regarding the fringe nature of the theory, here is an article in English, by Prof. Walter Bortz of Stanford Medical school, which you may find relevant: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/walter-m-bortz-ii-md/dare-to-be-100-gold-medal_b_7270616.html

Thanks!

       Cordula (Hasperasperagus) Hasperasperagus (talk) 11:41, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

In any case, let the discussion run its course. Consensus will determine whether or not the article belongs on Wikipedia. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:46, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Incorrect Information[edit]

Hey there, just wanted to let you know that you have false information on your crayon shin chan wiki page. Taiwan is not a province of China, and it is not stated as one officially. It is very offensive to any Taiwanese person who reads it and very misleading to others. Please remove it or edit the text so that It does not imply Taiwan as part of China since it is a very touchy subject. I am not sure if you intentionally wrote that in order to spite the Taiwanese people or just didn't know. If it's the ladder, then it is understandable. But if not, then I don't know to feel about it other than utter disappointment.

I hope you are having a good day. -Felix — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.57.1.58 (talk) 14:55, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

While I am fully aware of the China-Taiwan dispute (and indeed, Wikipedia does state that Taiwan is de-facto independent from China), such discussions belong on articles related to China and Taiwan, not on articles about Crayon Shin-chan of all things. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 05:09, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Shokugeki 1% or 10%[edit]

Here is also a picture directly from the manga supporting this case: https://puu.sh/x0sO2/3a15a84d10.png Whippedaway (talk) 11:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC) If the wikia is not a dependable source, where did the 10% come from?

You can cite the manga and/or the anime directly. See Template:Cite episode/doc for instructions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:59, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

About Oppai Volleyball film[edit]

Can you please add categories in Oppai Volleyball article. Also, Opencooper left some reviews about Haru's Journey on its talk page. So can you please add them in the article if they are from reliable sources. -- Phoenix God (talk) 10:43, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

@Phoenix God: Adding categories is really easy, just add [[Category:<category name here>]] to the end of the article; repeat if you want to add more categories. As for the reviews, it seems all of them are from reliable sources; if reviews exist on those sites for Oppai Volleyball, then feel free to add them to the article too. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:04, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

@Narutolovehinata5: Is it okay if i make an article about Tomodachi Game (manga). Its details are here.[1] Since you're a new page reviewer, i think i should ask you directly because it takes quite some time to create an article. -- Phoenix God (talk) 07:35, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

@Phoenix God: If you wish to create an article but want feedback, you could create a userspace draft, or better yet, try Wikipedia:Articles for creation. As for Tomodachi Game, it appears to have coverage from ANN and elsewhere, so I think it's notable and has enough sources to have a decently-written article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:03, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
@Narutolovehinata5: Thank you. I just want to confirm if Tomodachi Game is notable enough to has a page on wikipedia or not. Because i don't want to waste my time on a article that will be deleted. Btw that's not the first article i will be creating. -- Phoenix God (talk) 11:30, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
@Phoenix God: It's best to just be bold and write an article, without worrying about deletion. As long as the manga has been significantly covered in reliable sources (in the manga's case, that could be in English or Japanese), then it's unlikely to be nominated for deletion. Also: notability can change: what may not be notable in the past may become notable in the present or future (the reverse rarely happens though, and when it does, it's due to stronger notability guidelines). Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:51, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Can you please add categories in Otaku ni Koi wa Muzukashii article. Phoenix God (talk) 13:03, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

@Phoenix God: It should be pretty easy to add categories to the article yourself: just add [[Category:<name of category>]] to the end of the article (one per category; make sure to use the preview function to check if the category you added exists). In addition, you could also use tools like Wikipedia:HotCat to make the process even easier (as it also gives suggestions and corrections). Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:35, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Sorry! I know that but i don't want to add categories myself because i am an Otaku before a wikipedian, and i dislikes to lable them. But, here on wikipedia, we needs categories in article. That's why i always ask others.
Also, that page is not reviewed yet. Phoenix God (talk) 14:34, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
@Phoenix God: It doesn't matter if it's not reviewed yet, the article could always be worked on. Also, being an otaku is not a hindrance for categorizing articles; if anything, it's actually an advantage. And in any case, most categories are uncontroversial (i.e. 2017 anime television series, Anime based on original screenplays, Romance anime and manga, etc.), and as long as these categories are verifiable, they shouldn't be a problem. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 14:41, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
You're right but still i don't feel like adding categories. So please add them on my place. Phoenix God (talk) 16:36, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Kurosawa edits[edit]

Thanks for your support in June for the GA review of Kurosawa which helped so much that I nominated it for FAC. There has been a final call from sysops at FAC for final support and oppose indications if you have a chance to visit the FAC page. JohnWickTwo (talk) 23:38, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for the invitation; unfortunately, as I lack experience in FACs at the moment, I will be unable to participate in the discussion. Hoping for your understanding. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:37, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

How to create Wikipedia Page About Real Person[edit]

Sir Can you help me to create Wikipedia page about real person? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marketervinay (talkcontribs) 07:05, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Shin uchiha[edit]

Hello Narutolovehinata5. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Shin uchiha, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not an unambiguous copyright infringement, or there is other content to save. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 14:15, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Specifically, it's the fact that http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/Shin_Uchiha is released under a CC-BY-SA license (i.e. it can be copied provided attribution is given). Primefac (talk) 14:16, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

A34 crash[edit]

Why are you going to delete my article? I followed all wikipedia's guidelines and spent ages gathering information then typing it for the benefit of giving knowledge to others. 10^10a (talk) 15:30, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

First of all, I am not deleting the article (and I cannot do so anyway since I am not a Wikipedia administrator); consensus among Wikipedia users will determine if the article should be deleted or not, with an administrator making a decision at least a week from now. It's been nominated for deletion because the nominator (in this case, me) does not believe that the accident satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Specifically, has the incident been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources? Meaning, was it covered extensively in one or more reliable sources? If so, (and this is more relevant in the case of vehicular incidents), did the incident have a long-lasting effect on at least a local scale? Did it lead to changes in law or other practices? Of course, other users could and are free to say otherwise, but in my opinion, it does not. But hey, that's what discussion is for; if consensus determines that in fact the accident does satisfy those questions, then the article might not be deleted. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:37, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

R-e Alexa Stephenson Bruce[edit]

I was never disagreeing that it was the right action to take, I just thought you were a touch speedy with your speedy (14 minutes for a page with an {{in use}} tag). Definitely enough time has passed now with no updates that it's no concern (in case you were curious it seems that she's the niece of Fiona Bruce). If it seemed like I was questioning your judgement: I wasn't. You clearly do good work please keep it up. menaechmi (talk) 16:27, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shiwam Kumar Sriwastaw[edit]

Adready opened for the new account so I combined your report. Meters (talk) 04:16, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Hello Narutolovehinata5, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.

Technology update:

  • Rentier has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.

General project update:

  • The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
  • Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Luke Shen-Tien Chi[edit]

Pleased specified the pacific location and that you think it's been advertised. We will gladly remove such statements if we think it fits. However, If your decision is without merit. You should consider to fix your own mistakes! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike7682 (talkcontribs) 06:37, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Kenji Okajima[edit]


Thank you for your careful review on an article I wrote.

You are asking "published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject".

I would like to respectfully remind you that he applies to the criteria, possibly 7, of Wikipedia:Notability (academics), which does not require significant secondary resources to demonstrate their biographies.

The reference 4 is a statement by an official investigation committee established among two universities. The fact that the committee independent of subject concluded that the he made misconduct is the best reliable third-party proof of the fact. Multiple media coverage are based on this statement by the committee, including reference 5.

This statement was also strengthened by another statement made by JSPS, a governmental organization, which announced that they banned the subject to apply grant for 7 years, by citing the original statement. This serves as a secondary source.

In addition, independent of these official investigation, a webpage by an anonymous volunteer, indeed used the data in the original publication to demonstrate the unequivocal evidence of data manipulation. This is not in the reference but is listed in the external link.

I noticed that reference 5 was no longer available, which will be eliminated.

Please let me know if satisfies your concern.

You may need to add said media coverage to the draft first. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:16, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Thank you again for your comment.
According to your suggestion, two media articles are added to the draft. Please let me know if you think they are sufficient to support the content of the article.
--133.3.201.51 (talk) 10:31, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Dear Narutolovehinata5,
I wonder if you had chance to check my revision. If anything still helps, please let me know.
--133.3.201.51 (talk) 06:02, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
I've taken a look at the draft, and basically there are still a lot of unsourced statements in the draft, particularly the "Career" section (which may needed to be converted into a prose section instead of a list). Please supply footnotes. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 06:43, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Fred Joerger[edit]

Only two of the six references are from obituaries. One reference is from a book, and two are magazine articles. There are other "Imagineers" that have wiki articles, that contributed far less to the creation of Disneyland than Mr. Joerger. Frankly, I don't think the criteria are being applied evenly to all subjects. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Throm Strumond (talkcontribs) 21:10, 26 August 2017 (UTC) Throm Strumond (talk) 23:50, 26 August 2017 (UTC) 8/26/2017

Spokenology[edit]

Unfortunately, I believe your rejection was a mistake. Please carefully take the time look into all the news coverage within China. To make your final decision. Thank you so much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike7682 (talkcontribs) 05:15, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Please read the messages left in your talk page. In addition, while hits do exist online for Spokenology, none of them appear to be reliable or significant. Perhaps other sources exist in Chinese, but these need to first be added to the draft, then be checked. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 05:32, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

AfC submission[edit]

Hey, you recently accepted the AfC submission Draft:Felida97/Aaron Sorkin Awards‎. I believe that was a mistake. Even though I wrote the draft, I didn't submit it as an AfC, because it is not a publishable article yet, like not even close. I say that, because it is a very early draft. I just copy and pasted another awards list I created to have a structure for this one, and so far have only adjusted the Golden Globes to the awards of Aaron Sorkin (and even then I didn't adjust the references). Then I worked on other drafts and articles, and kind of forgot about it. That is where the draft was, when it was submitted. As I understand, it was submitted to keep it from a speedy deletion (G13), which I think is fine, even though it is not ready to be published.
But why did you accept an AfC submission into the mainspace that has so many problems? Just to name a few obvious ones: 1. the infobox, where I left space for a picture, and the total amount of awards and nominations, still looks the same, 2. the awards are not the awards of Aaron Sorkin (except the Golden Globes) but the awards of Ron Howard, and even the linked IMDb page is labeled 'Ron Howard' and not 'Aaron Sorkin', 3. the section 'Other awards' exists but has no awards in it (since I hadn't filled them in like most of the draft). These things alone should be enough for the AfC submission to be rejected and not accepted, I think, though I'm not very fond of the AfC guidelines.
So my question to resolve this problem is: could you move the page back into draftspace or my userspace, because I really don't think it belongs in the mainspace (yet), and I would never create an article in such a state? I would also be fine with a speedy deletion, since it probably qualifies for that in the form that it is right now. But maybe there is another explanation for your actions that I somehow missed. Thanks Felida97 (talk) 11:41, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
@Legacypac: Just mentioning Legacypac since he submitted the draft and commented on the AfC submission, and may be more or less interested in this. Felida97 (talk) 11:43, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

It looked pretty good on it's face - too good to Speedy Delete G13 (which is happening to abandoned drafts now). You can move it anywhere you like or seek deletion. Legacypac (talk) 11:47, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

@Legacypac: @Felida97: The draft looked good enough to be published, and while there were some "errors" in the draft (like what you've mentioned so far), these could easily be fixed regardless if they were in the mainspace or not. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:51, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
@Narutolovehinata5: @Legacypac: I guess that's sort of my fault for creating drafts based on previous drafts. The contents just would need to be replaced almost entirely which I rather do in the draft space. But thank you for explaining and resolving it so quickly. Felida97 (talk) 12:02, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

I've shifted it back to Draft:List of awards and nominations received by Aaron Sorkin for now. Legacypac (talk) 11:55, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

12:42:27, 28 August 2017 review of submission by Langley242[edit]


12:47:19, 28 August 2017 review of submission by Langley242[edit]


Article draft: CAUTG declined[edit]

Hello Narutolovehinata5, I am wondering why you have declined my article the second time. The reason for your first no vote seemed clear enough so I went through and amply expanded the references included. As you write now: " Independent and significant coverage is still needed. Sources from or affiliated with the association are not sufficient." Yet my sources are largely unaffiliated. 1: is an independently published book. 2: is the Government of Canada 3: is an independent, peer reviewed article 4: is a host organization with links to 80+ groups like the CAUTG, and 80 universities. 5: is an academic publisher (the University of Toronto) that is required to maintain a neutral stance towards Seminar and has no interest in falsely promoting it 6: is an independent, peer reviewed article 7: is an independently published book 8: is admittedly from Seminar, but this is the second citation for the same info 9: is admittedly from Seminar's website, but this is citing a list of the journal's editors. Unless someone were to write an explicit history of the journal, it is unlikely this list would appear elsewhere. As you see, most of these sources are independent. While #9 is not, it provides relevant information not available elsewhere. Please let me know specifically which citations you would like to see improved. Thanks, Sean. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SeanMcPhail (talkcontribs) 12:30, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

@SeanMcPhail: I do not have access to any of the offline sources in the article, so could you kindly provide quotes from the offline sources that discuss the organization? In addition, it appears that the sources discuss more about German linguistics studies than the organization, at least from what the titles appear to suggest. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:52, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Narutolovehinata5. You have new messages at Narutolovehinata5's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sure thing. Let me know if there are any more you need access to:

  • From Guse: "Im Hinblick auf DaF-Forschung hat sich die kanadische Germanistik besonders in der interkulturellen Forschung hervorgetan...Das kanadische Verbandswesen ist seit den 70er Jahren in sechs Provinzverbänden organisiert. Daneben gibt es den Kanadischen Verband der deutschen Sprachschulen (KVDS, gegrundet 1977) sowie die erwähnte CAUTG (1962 gegründet) und die immer mehr an Bedeutung gewinnende, nationale und institutionsübergreifende Canadian Association of Teachers of German (CATG, gegründet 1997 als Fusion des Western Council on the Teaching of German [WCTG] mit dem Canadian Council on the Teaching of German." Which translates to: "With regard to German-as-a-Second-Language research, Canadian German studies has proved to be particularly relevant in intercultural research...The Canadian federation has been organized in six provincial associations since the 1970s. In addition, there is the Canadian Association of German Language Schools (KVDS, founded in 1977) as well as CAUTG (founded in 1962) and the ever-growing national and cross-institutional Canadian Association of Teachers of German (CATG), founded in 1997 as a fusion of the Western Council on the Teaching of German [WCTG] with the Canadian Council on the Teaching of German."
  • Also from Guse: "Stärker als bisher sollten Deutschabteilungen ihre Graduate-Studenten und Kollegen zum Besuch der Jahresversammlung der CATG ermuntern, auch wenn seit einigen Jahren auf der CAUTG-Tagung ebenfalls linguistische und pädagogische Themen zur Diskussion stehen und somit ein wichtiger Schritt zur Integration der DaF-Pädagogik in die traditionell, literaturwissenschaftlich dominierte Germanistik geleistet wurde." Which translates to: "Even more than before, German departments should encourage their graduate students and colleagues to attend the annual meeting of the CATG [Canadian Association of Teachers of German—the secondary school equivalent of the CAUTG, see above quotation]; linguistic and pedagogical topics have also been discussed for some years at the CAUTG meeting and thus represent an important step towards the integration of German-as-a-Second-Language pedagogy into German studies, traditionally dominated by the study of literature."
  • From Arnott et al.: "The Canadian Association of University Teachers of German (CAUTG), for example, recommended in 2012 that German departments align their language programs with the CEFR to facilitate student mobility and ensure appropriate course placement of incoming postsecondary students, citing the framework’s competencies scale and international acceptance beyond Europe as especially valuable."
  • From Gibbs and Johnson: "Seminar: A Journal of Germanic Studies. Toronto. Univ. of Toronto Press. 1965. Quarterly since 1974. Sponsored by the Canadian Association of University Teachers of German and the Germanic Section of the Australasian Universities Language and Literature Association."
  • If I can find time I will be adding a few more sources tonight. eg.: From Hans-Jürgen Krumm: "Speziell für Lehrende an Colleges und Universitäten ist der kanadische Hochschulgermnistenverband (CAUTG Canadian Association of University Teachers of German) zuständig. Er widmet sich hauptsächlich der Forschung und Vernetzung von GermanistInnen, veranstaltet jedoch auch in Kooperation mit dem Goethe-Institut anlässlich seiner jährlichen Tagungen regelmäßig Workshops zur Lehrerfortbildung." Which translates to: "The Canadian Germanist University Association (CAUTG Canadian Association of University Teachers of German) is responsible for teaching at colleges and universities. It is mainly devoted to the research and networking of German-speaking people, but also organizes workshops for teacher training in cooperation with the Goethe-Institut on the occasion of its annual conferences."

In the meantime, hopefully you will find these helpful. Sorry for the poor formatting—still learning here. SeanMcPhail (talk) 21:31, 31 August 2017 (UTC)SeanMcPhail

Update: 31/08/17 Since I haven't heard from you (I think I signed the last post incorrectly), I've gone ahead and cleaned up some of the poorer sources. In addition, I have added more government and book sources. Please let me know if you think this is sufficiently improved for submission. If not, please make specific suggestions. Thanks. Best, SeanMcPhail (talk) 21:31, 31 August 2017 (UTC)SeanMcPhail

Fred Joerger rejection[edit]

Only two of the six references are from obituaries. One reference is from a book, and two are magazine articles. There are other "Imagineers" that have wiki articles, that contributed far less to the creation of Disneyland than Mr. Joerger. Frankly, I don't think the criteria are being applied evenly to all subjects.Throm Strumond (talk) 22:04, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Request on 14:50:05, 31 August 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Hans J. Bittermann[edit]


Dear Sir I added two new references to my article Closed Coke Slurry System process (I know: with formal mistakes...) Is that OK for you? Best Hans J. Bittermann (Hans J. Bittermann (talk) 14:50, 31 August 2017 (UTC))

Hans J. Bittermann (talk) 14:50, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Daniel A. Levinthal bio page[edit]

Dear Narutolovehinata5,

I have made subsequent changes as suggested. I added more sources to Professor Levinthal and either removed YouTube references or added written sources and preserved YouTube links as secondary reference.

Best regards,

Satisficed

09:07:12, 2 September 2017 review of submission by Visionjohnny[edit]


But, pls check it well. I have atleast add 1 reference, and am unable to directly edit the page, so as to make some certain changes especially the references.

Blaakyum page draft[edit]

Hello Narutolovehinata5, thanks for the updates on that page.

Additionally to the problems that wikipedia reports, I think the biggest threat to this page failing the review is that the amount of information in it is disproportional to the band's fame. I have seen other pages and I think an unsaid rule is that this proportionality must exist. The page should be at least a third of its size in my opinion. The biography section in particular is probably way too big.

Having said that, I don't have much experience with this, I cannot find a 'talk' page, to discuss the draft with the other contributors, where do I find such a draft page where one can mention the other contributors and discuss changes with them? If there is no such page, what is the process for doing this?

Best, Jad

Request on 15:04:57, 2 September 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Giznej[edit]


Thank you reviewing the article. I don't think that "Multi-objective linear programming" should be included as a subsection to "Multi-objective Optimization". The theory about this subarea is too rich in order to treat it in a subsection. By the same reason there is an article about "Linear Programming"; It is not just a subsection of "Mathematical Programming". The draft is just a beginning. Many other aspects can be added, like duality, solution algorithms, applications.

Giznej (talk) 15:04, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Cumberland House Rejection[edit]

Cumberland House Rejection[edit]

kumusta po kayou? Hi there. You asked that I use sources independent of the University of Toronto. I used three references and only one of them was related to the university of Toronto. The other two references are independent websites that focus on historical buildings in Canada. My article is noteworthy and describes a 157 year old building that was built and occupied by one of Canada's most famous architects. I strongly believe in precedent and have been using wikipedia for quite some time now. When I click on random article for fun I am aghast at what has been approved as an article. Articles one sentence long and articles with zero references have been approved but my well researched article article is declined? I hope I don't come across as disrespectful, I am just surprised that my article was declined. I look forward to reading your response. Cheers

@VoraciousEditor: At the moment, there are only three references in the article, all of which have been duplicated several times in the article. The University of Toronto citation, for example, is repeated eight times, which isn't by itself problematic, although there's an easier way to cite that way: see WP:CITE for more information. The Wholemap.com link (itself of questionable reliability, by our definition of reliable sources) is repeated nine times. The most promising source is the Torontoplaques.com citation, but that wouldn't suffice. The article is well-written and would have been accepted already had the referencing been better. You are free to work on the draft; if possible, please try to provide significant coverage from independent reliable sources (ideally those not affiliated with the University of Toronto); these may be online or offline. This search is a good start.
As an aside, you may need to read WP:OSE. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 14:05, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

NetScaler[edit]

Hi there, Narutolovehinata5! Thanks so much for reviewing my AfC submission for NetScaler and taking it live. Now that it's live, would you mind removing the connected contributor template and the {{COI}} banner from the article? I added the connected contributor template to the draft at AfC to make sure that editors noted my COI when reviewing, but these generally only live on the Talk page (you'll see I'd added one there too). For the COI banner, this was added when reviewers were looking over the originally submitted draft back in April. Since I've made edits to address their concerns and no new ones have been raised, can this be removed? Thanks in advance! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 12:56, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

You're welcome; however, the COI template needs to stay for now for disclosure reasons; someone else might remove it later on. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:01, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Totally agreed that disclosure is important, however my understanding from the connected contributor template instructions is that it only needs to remain on the Talk page. For the COI banner, I'll check back with the editors who reviewed the draft previously and see if they feel it can be removed now. Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 17:07, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

02:15:55, 7 September 2017 review of submission by Idarwin[edit]


I've added a number of external links, most in the "Approach and Programs" section, which both identify particular country programs and also expand in various ways on the organization. Some of the links are from "major" MSM like HuffPost and CBC.ca. If it is a matter of the ratio of external links to internal, I can remove some of those, but that seems childish and I don't think that's what you meant! :-) Wonder if I could ask you please to take a look at it again, and if there are still specific sections that you think sound like an ad, call them out briefly? Please?

Many thanks for your time and your (obviously many) contributions to wikipedia!

Ian Darwin

For various reasons (like how it it's not always clear which articles have editorial oversight or not), we generally don't really consider the Huffington Post to be a reliable source. Unless there are no other available sources that can be used to cite the statements that use HuffPo as a citation, I would recommend that use a different source. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:31, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

13:46:02, 7 September 2017 review of submission by DrSyence[edit]



Good Morning,

I am writing in regards to your decision decline my submission on Joshua Sullivan for lack of notoriety. The subject whom I am writing about, Joshua Sullivan, is one of the leading data scientists in the world. He is co-founder of an annual competition that just awarded a $1 million purse prize for helping the National Cancer Institute to improve lunger cancer detection rates. (Here is the mention on cancer.gov's own website: https://prevention.cancer.gov/news-and-events/news/data-science-bowl-launched)

I have included 27 independent sources, including the Wall St. Journal, Harvard Business Review, Information Week and Federal Computer Week. Additionally, Sullivan is prominently featured in some of the articles, not merely mentioned, and his book on big data was just featured on this scientific website: https://insidebigdata.com/2017/06/23/book-review-mathematical-corporation-josh-sullivan-angela-zutavern/

At any rate, I would appreciate some more specific feedback as to why this subject lacks notoriety. He may not be a popular mainstream figure, but he is notable, and that notability is clearly cited in my draft and above.

Thank you kindly.

DrSyence DrSyence (talk) 13:46, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

@DrSyence: References look somewhat promising, though they may need to be formatted to something other than bare links (you can use the template {{cite sources}} or the VisualEditor for this purpose). Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 05:58, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

AfC submission[edit]

Dear Narutolovehinata5,

I have made the necessary modifications for my AfC submission that you have reviewed. The story plot was made more succinct and shorter. Also, I have included the reception for the item's draft, but unfortunately, I was not able to find that much reviews about The Twisted Ones, because there were so far no critic reviews for it. Instead, I decided to add in relevant reviews from audiences thought they were not critics. Is it okay if you could review it again, and if the draft is still found feasible, is it suitable to be accepted as a Wikipedia article? If not, I will make the necessary improvements for its reliability.

Yours sincerely, Cosecant57 (talk) 13:41, September 8 2017 (UTC)

11:05:18, 8 September 2017 review of submission by Uaria2008[edit]


Hi Narutolovehinata5, I appreciate your effort of reviewing my draft article. I am new to this and consistently improving my draft by following the guidelines of Wikipedia. However, I am just wondering why it has been declined while there are some existing articles written the same like this and they were approved. E.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SocialEngine and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolphin_(social_networking_software) . Please help me improved and/or tell me exactly what are the things I need to do in order for this article to be approved and listed in Wikipedia page. Thanks.

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Hello Narutolovehinata5,

Although my draft was declined, I appreciate it for the help in editing Articles and the tips you gave me. I will ensure that I will learn the skills in creating Articles and editing them and make sure not to make the "classic" mistakes in creating them and that i will do so thoroughly. I hpoe that one day, I will apply these skills into works and hopefully be more skilled in Wikipedia editing. Thank you for the help! with Regards, Cosecant57 (talk) 17:19, 2017-09-10 (UTC)

Request on 08:29:43, 11 September 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by HeinrichVomBerg[edit]


HeinrichVomBerg (talk) 08:29, 11 September 2017 (UTC)


HeinrichVomBerg (talk) 08:29, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

09:48:24, 11 September 2017 review of submission by Cosecant57[edit]

Narutolovehinata5, sorry for the interruption. I have a question regarding the creating of articles. For the draft I was working on, Five Nights at Freddy's: The Twisted Ones, there were not any publications or critical responses about the novel's reception. So, is it okay to mention on the draft's "Reception" section that there have not been any reviews or published articles regarding the novel's sales numbers or critic reviews?

@Cosecant57: If no significant reviews in reliable sources appear to exist: I hate to say this, but it would pretty much mean that the book is not notable enough to have its own article on Wikipedia. I understand it might hurt to read this, especially after the work you've done on the draft, but our notability guidelines are clear. At best, you could try working on the main Five Nights at Freddy's article instead. I know this may sound disappointing, but this shouldn't discourage you from editing. Perhaps instead, you could try working on articles on other topics that interest you. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:16, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Oh, okay then. Thanks anyways Naruto. I guess I will have to move over the draft works. Cosecant57 (talk) 14:42, 2017-09-12 (UTC)

Notability[edit]

Hello Narutolovehinata,

you recently rejected a redirect i tried to make about "Massivan", redirecting it to "Buddha Bar compilation albums". I did that because somehow there was no way to prove the notability of this musician, and I finally found in the Notability guidelines, under point 10: Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc. (But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that article. Read WP:BLP1E and WP:BIO1E for further clarifications). There is already the mention of Massivan in the main article so it only needs the redirect. I really would appreciate if you could take time for an explanation so I can learn how to do it right next time. Thanks, ivanpe Ivanpe (talk) 07:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Simple: you could have instead created a page titled "Massivan" (without "Draft:") and redirected it to the Buddha Bar article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:41, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Steward Levenson AfC decline[edit]

Hi, I noticed you recently declined my AfC proposed article for Stewart Levenson citing that he was only notable for a single event. First, thank you for reviewing this so quickly— I was very surprised to get a review so soon, considering that another article I submitted there two weeks ago has still not been looked at by anyone yet. Second, I wanted to discuss your decision on this article about someone who has been the subject of non-trivial discussion in multiple reliable secondary independent sources. WP:BLP1E was something I was concerned about as well, but the policy page on that states that if the event in question is notable (and I think it is, and I don't think that anyone doubts this), and if the subject's role in relation to that event is significant (like John Hinckley Jr. and the Reagan assassination attempt) and appears to be ongoing or of lasting significance (the event continues to unfold no way to know just how long it will go on but probably for a year or two, maybe more), then such a person may warrant an independent article— provided that there is significant coverage in the right kinds of sources. Given that, I am not sure how the article I submitted doesn't meet this requirement, esp. considering that some of the sources mentioned are places like the Boston Globe and New Hampshire Public Radio et al. He seems to have coverage, and while this is only in relation to one event, the event is (I think) notable and he was/ is one of the co-leaders of the group involved (i.e., he had/ has a major role in the event). Please share your thoughts with me on that, okay? Thanks! KDS4444 (talk) 13:58, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

@KDS4444: Considering WP:BLP1E, he probably can't have an article; however, maybe a brief mention at a section on the incident at VA Hospital may suffice. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:24, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
I guess I'm still not sure I understand-- you state he can't have an article because of BLP1E, but I thought I had shown that his role in the event was significant (yes?) and that the event itself was notable (also yes?), therefore BLP1E was no longer grounds for exclusion. KDS4444 (talk) 03:31, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
For news events to be considered notable, you may wish to take a look at WP:109PAPERS, but suffice to say, it's more about long-term coverage and long-term impact than simply the amount of coverage. If say, an event gets a ton of coverage in one day but coverage dies out the next day, it may still not considered notable. Even if the event itself was notable, it would make more sense to mention Levenson in such an article rather give him his own article, considering it's not clear that he's notable outside of that one specific event. That's what WP:BLP1E is about. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 06:17, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Okay, here I am summarizing BLP1E: "We should generally avoid having an article on a person when each of three conditions is met: 1.) if reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event, 2.) if that person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, and 3.) if the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well, documented." I don't debate points 1 or 2 (though 2 requires us to assess the subject's potential long-term notability, which it seems hard to do at this point), but 3 is my sticking point: BLP1E is about not having articles about people who have low profiles in unremarkable events, but if the event is notable and the person has a large role within it, then that suggests BLP1E no longer applies. The event, to me, looks likely to go on for at least a few years (complete shakeups of VA hospital top staff are not done quickly), and the subject certainly has a large role in making this happen (as shown by the coverage he personally has received). Also, my sources here were newspapers with completely different text and radio broadcasts separate from the newspapers— they were not multiple copies of the exact same word-for-word story covered in multiple places, they were stories published by different authors in different papers, often several days apart on separate parts of the story. Thoughts on this? KDS4444 (talk) 10:53, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
@KDS4444: Notability is not temporary, but it also needs to be proven that it will have a major long-lasting effect. While it may still have coverage now, it remains to be seen if it will have coverage in the future. At the very least, perhaps Levenson should not have an article himself, the event itself is still of questionable notability, and perhaps the best option that could be done is instead to write a section on the incident on the hospital's article. You may instead wish to include the information at the article on Veterans Health Hospital. In addition, it appears that a previous article version of the draft had been deleted in an AfD discussion, and said deletion was endorsed at deletion review. If you haven't already talked to either Jo-Jo Eumurus or RoySmith about this matter, I suggest you do so now. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:09, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
If you are aware of the previous deletion discussion and its review then you probably also know that I have discussed this matter with both Roy and Jo Jo, though without a conclusive explanation that aligns well with what I have understood to be Wikipedia policies regarding BLPs. I have a subject who has been discussed non-trivially multiple times in major national newspapers and other verifiable independent reliable news sources but who is being prevented from having an article about him on Wikipedia because one version of that article wasn't considered acceptable. That shouldn't mean that no version is acceptable... But once a decision "against" a particular individual's article forms, it seems that no one is willing to look at any version of an article on that individual and judge it on its merits, without reference to past versions in the same namespace. If I were a new page patroller and I had read the version of the article that you did, I don't think I would have hesitated to mark it patrolled and move on. And I understand that if you yourself approved the article in any form, you would be opening yourself up to ridicule by your peers who already decided the namespace is tainted. It was a lot for me to ask of you, and I am sorry to have placed you on the spot in that respect. Thank you for reviewing it in any case. KDS4444 (talk) 03:22, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Rythm Magic article decline[edit]

Thank you for reviewing my article above Narutolovehinata. I have been trying to trim the article of promotional content. My intent is to show how music helps at-risk-youth, and I find the Rhythm Magic a unique way of doing this. Can you please help me by telling me how I can trim more? Thanks much! Soli58 (talk) 00:08, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

You may wish to use alternate outlets other than Wikipedia, as Wikipedia is not a place to promote organizations. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:20, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter[edit]

Hello Narutolovehinata5, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
  • Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!

Technology update:

  • The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225

General project update:

  • On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
  • Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

18:40:04, 22 September 2017 review of submission by Smart1983[edit]



Hi

Thank you for reverting back to my draft - JammuStartups. I understand, am not able to make through the guidelines that's why being declined. But also a bit confused regarding - I mean almost everything being rejected. To understand the definition of Notable - I mean if its the first community in some region - does that not matter at all or not notable for a community of people. However, references from the local news paper does not work here at all too - please guide me on this. If this is something not workable please let me know because a small community like us can't easily make through Telegraph or NewYork times as living in Jammu, India. If any suggestions please feel free to share.

Thank you for reading this long message, I understand on daily basis you may have go through 1000's of pages. I really appreciate that hopefully am not creating troubles here.

Best Regards, smart1983

You may wish to read WP:GNG and WP:ORG for information about our notability guidelines. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:49, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

15:32:27, 24 September 2017 review of submission by Quarta b L.S.A.[edit]



Hi Narutolovehinata5. I'm tring to translate the italian page Anna Maria Enriques Agnoletti in english to edit the tradution in the english version on Wikipedia, but I know that there aren't enought informations. Can I request your review of this page? What are the improvements I need to do? Thanks for the availability. --Quarta b L.S.A. (talk) 15:32, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

What the article needs is more footnotes: instructions can be read at pages like WP:CITE and WP:V. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 14:55, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

03:46:54, 25 September 2017 review of submission by Leebrandoncremer[edit]


Can you give me a few examples of how this is not NPOV... I have read alot of Wiki articles that follow this manner. I will modify the article where necessary for a second submission.

You may wish to read pages like WP:YFA, which give tips on how to write an encyclopedic and neutral article. You may also wish to read WP:WTA, which discusses what kind of words should generally be avoided in article content. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 14:53, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Naruto/Naruto Uzumaki[edit]

Those articles are mostly 1989's works so better ask him.Tintor2 (talk) 16:58, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

12:43:12, 29 September 2017 review of submission by Aqsatahir[edit]


Dear Sir/ Madam,

I am requesting a re-review of this page because now i have removed all the references that initially was the reasons for rejection and were deemed not so reliable. I have now provided all the reference that are from reliable sources including news papers, news and free images as per your feedback on the rejection message.

Warm Regards

DYK for Sayaka Harada[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 30 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sayaka Harada, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sayaka Harada. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sayaka Harada), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex ShihTalk 05:30, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

02:57:47, 2 October 2017 review of submission by Doctorg[edit]


Thank you for taking the time to review Draft:Randy Clark (minister). I appreciate your feedback. Can you expound a bit on your thoughts? There are 14 citations used and 9 of those are from indepentdent secondary sources. One source is cited multiple times because I wanted to include all the appropriae page numbers. Is your concern that this one book is used too much? The content from this book is biographical in nature and is the best source for his early life. After that, other secondary sources are used for the more notable events. Doctor (talk) 02:57, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Some of the other sources look promising, but as they're offline I don't have access to them. Perhaps another reviewer could take a look at the draft? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your response, I I'm going to change the way I cited Clark's book in the first paragraph and then I will resubmit. Doctor (talk) 10:33, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

17:02:59, 5 October 2017 review of submission by VivaLaPandaz[edit]


Hello. I've been modeling this page to have as many or more independent sources as the Vlasic Pickles page because it is difficult to fine full page news articles talking about a particular product. The Vlasic page only has 3 news articles that reference it directly, two of which are dead links. I have a wide variety of news sources already listed as sources, some of which are full articles about the company. I am have read the guidelines and feel that this article has met them, and am having difficulty thinking of what sort of additional news coverage would make a difference. As a Wikipedia user it's reasonable that I'd want to know more details about a company, but midsize brands like Bubbies or Vlasic don't have many New York Times articles that focus solely on the brand. What is this page lacking in terms of sources that the page for Vlasic has, so that I can seek out sources of that type.f

Thank you very much for taking your time to make Wikipedia a useful source and I appreciate your consideration of my request.

You may wish to read WP:CORP, which describes our notability guidelines on companies. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:51, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

TERRELL JAMES resubmit[edit]

Hello Narutolovehinata5, I am back with a revision to the proposed Terrell James article, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Terrell_James. Previously, it was rejected for,

1. Notability. I believe notability has been established, based on: a. the number of public art institutions that collect the subject's work; b. the number of prominent art critics and art world figures drawn to write about the subject (they are listed near the end of the article, with their publication pedigrees footnoted); and c. the number and type of honors conferred on the subject by various organizations, ranging from the Texan French Alliance for the Arts, to the Art League Houston ("Texas Artist of the Year, 2016" award).

2. Promotional tone. I did my best to eliminate Peacock Terms, I hope you agree they are gone. [or tell me where the remainder are, I'm perfectly happy to cull them]

3. Sectioning. I followed the Wikipedia outline suggestions as directly as I could.

4. In-line citations. I believe the article is thoroughly footnoted to verifiable sources.

5. Not showing significant coverage about the subject. This has been fixed via citations to books, magazines and high quality on-line publications (notably, www.Glasstire.com).

Thanks and I look forward to any additional questions, Camo1955

Article appears to be vastly improved, probably ready to be accepted. Any remaining kinks can be sorted out by other users. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:50, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Camo1955 (talk) 20:15, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

That's very good news. What is the next step - does the article remain a draft for additional reviewers to consider? When can it be moved to the main space? Many thanks for your attention Camo1955 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Camo1955 (talkcontribs) 16:31, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Pretty much. AFC has a backlog though so approval may take some time. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 16:33, 6 October 2017 (UTC)


Camo1955 (talk) 18:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

02:58:00, 8 October 2017 review of submission by Rcg14[edit]




|ts=Template:Rcg14:|declined=Draft:Pregnancy_Pillow}} I am trying to turn this in for a project and I am doing the best to try to comply to what is needed but not sure how I can get this to not sound like advertisement I am not selling this pillow. Just trying to state that this gives support, the different types of pillows out there and the benefits of having the pillow. Please help ASAP and I can certainly to to resubmit this tonight if possible.

@Rcg14: Wikipedia is not a soapbox or a place for promotion. However, you are free to contribute to our article on pillow. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 05:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Exhange reviews?[edit]

I recently saw you nominated Konomi Suzuki to GA. I also nominated Lenalee Lee to GA too. Wanna exchange reviews? If you are busy, we can do it this weekend. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 00:22, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

@Tintor2: Sure, why not? If I'm not busy, I can review Lenalee's article as early as today, or at the very least within the next few days. The plan is for Suzuki's article to be at GA status so I can nominate it for DYK by her birthday (November 5), so it would be best for the article to be improved as soon as possible. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:57, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Konomi Suzuki[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Konomi Suzuki you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tintor2 -- Tintor2 (talk) 02:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#Sources for PreCure voice actors[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#Sources for PreCure voice actors. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 08:24, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Konomi Suzuki[edit]

The article Konomi Suzuki you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Konomi Suzuki for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tintor2 -- Tintor2 (talk) 16:02, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Request on 19:09:16, 19 October 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Afarin Majidi[edit]



Afarin Majidi (talk) 19:09, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Please Help: I don't understand. The company is owned by Mercury whose Wikipedia page is not that different from the page I created. I have very verifiable sources. Look at them. Starting over would be fine but the problem is the same.