User talk:NatGertler

The Southern Poverty Law Center Hate Groups List

There is a discussion that may interest you at

• Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Revisiting the Southern Poverty Law Center Hate Groups List

--Guy Macon (talk) 15:29, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Unnecessary

This was quite unnecessary. Yes, per WP:YOUTUBE, YouTube can be a source, but unless you looked at the YouTube video, how can you know? Quite an ignorant oversight on your part. PepsiPhilPunk (talk) 01:37, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

Actually, it seems very necessary, as you were trying to edit-war away sources without due reason. Yes, you can go look at the YouTube video. You can see that it's posted by the WWE themselves. Are you deleting references without bothering to check what they are? -- Nat Gertler (talk) 01:51, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

I gave a reason in my edit summary, you are just not listening. I did check what they are, WWE's YouTube channel is not a reliable source, like WWE's shop wouldn't be. Educate yourself on what a reliable source actually is by reading Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Sources. Fightful would be preferrable. PepsiPhilPunk (talk) 19:16, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

Nothing at Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Sources says that the WWE is not reliable for this sort of material. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 19:26, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Hello. I would like to give you this barnstar as thanks for your efforts as a Wikipedian and wish you a very joyous holiday season. sjones23 (talk - contributions) 18:04, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

And the best of the season to you! -- Nat Gertler (talk) 18:12, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy New Year, NatGertler!

Happy New Year!

NatGertler,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
sjones23 (talk - contributions) 20:48, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Use cite template

Please use cite template next time. See Template:Cite_web#Examples. ~2026-92186 (talk) 14:19, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

ok

good ~2026-38215-4 (talk) 12:44, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

??? -- Nat Gertler (talk) 14:50, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Re: kemi olunloyo page

Please be aware it is kemi olunloyo herself that is editing her own page adding self glorifying adjectives to increase her social media business. This page has a long history of her editing it to her liking, just thought you should be made aware, the reversions are necessary due to malicious self glorifying editing of her own page. Take care ~2025-38557-85 (talk) 17:59, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Editor

I would consider the possibility that the other editor at Talk:Ken Silverstein (business journalist) is using LLMs to generate their replies, given the cadence of their comments and the fact that their citation of Wikipedia policies is contrary to their meaning. Katzrockso (talk) 00:09, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

I have already leaned into that as a possibility, which is just part of why I made my latest move to simplify response. Thanks for the concern. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 00:16, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

While we're at it, I think we should possibly consider filing an WP:AINB for further opinions on what to do about the LLM where necessary. sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:14, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

I don't think that's necessary regarding that article. Any material that editor added to the article had already been removed, and the discussion seemed to have reached a stopping point before 3O was sicced on it. ("Absent that, there is nothing further to address here.") Their edits only concern one other article, a submitted draft, if you wish to look into that. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 03:36, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Well, Nat, I'll go try checking into that draft and see what can be done in this case.

One thing's for certain: editors with good intentions (including myself) can make some mistakes all the time, especially when it comes to trying to help resolve any discussions. Also, as usual, I want to thank you for your efforts in improving Wikipedia. Regards, sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:50, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Having just checked out the article and its relevant logs (specifically the deletion ones), I suspected the user who created it was a sockpuppet of the indef-blocked user 65sugg (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (the SPI is here). Sorry for the trouble. sjones23 (talk - contributions) 23:10, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for filing that. I might be spared his attempts to mess with the article about me. Be well, and may all your edits be good ones! -- Nat Gertler (talk) 23:25, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, and may all your edits be good ones as well! Like I said, there are no hard feelings. Also, let's hope there aren't any issues between us based on misunderstandings. Best wishes, sjones23 (talk - contributions) 23:37, 22 January 2026 (UTC)