|This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.|
New Page Patrol survey
New page patrol – Survey Invitation
Hello NatGertler! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part.
You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey
|Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS|
Revision of the page: Delete Skype History (software)
Re. Bob menendez
Wanted your opinion on this : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bob_Menendez&oldid=654572367 I want to add headers to the controversies section and remove the recently added lead-in, specifically:
On April 1, 2015, Menendez was indicted on federal corruption charges related to favors he did for Florida ophthalmologist Salomon Melgen and gifts he received from him, including campaign donations and private flights. Melgen was charged as well. Menendez has pleaded not guilty to all charges.
It was reverted once so wanted to get a second opinion before I continued.
- Well, the material certainly needs to be at least broken up... but really, it may need redistribution. The essay at WP:CSECTION makes a case for avoiding "controversies" sections altogether. However, I do feel that his current situation is sufficiently of import to why people are likely to look at the article at this point that a mention in the intro is reasonable. --Nat Gertler (talk) 03:24, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Focus on the Family
I agree marriage equality is a loaded word and should be removed. I'm not really political on these topics so it was not my intention. However, the parts on creationism, their view on sex ed, and others should stay. I am restoring WP: NPOV right now. Thanks for your thoughts.
Do not remove other editors' comments from AN/I
- You may wish to read that yourself, as it points to personal attacks as something that should be removed. --Nat Gertler (talk) 03:12, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
5th Annual Wiknic
|5th Annual Wiknic (Saturday, July 11, 2015, ~9:30am-4pm)|
Dear fellow Wikipedian,
You are cordinally invited to the fifth annual Los Angeles Wiknic!
The Wiknic is a part of the nationwide Great American Wiknic. We'll be grilling, getting to know each other better, and building the L.A. Wikipedia community! The event is tentatively planned for Pan-Pacific Park (map) and will be held on Saturday, July 11, 2014 from 9:30am to 4pm or so. Please RSVP and volunteer to bring food or drinks if possible!
I hope to see you there! Howcheng (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:41, 21 June 2015 (UTC) Join our Facebook group here! To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.
Nomination of Marie-Ange Faugérolas for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marie-Ange Faugérolas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edcolins (talk) 19:55, 24 June 2015 (UTC)