I have reverted your edits to Joseph Conrad. Redirecting Congo Free State to Belgium Congo was inappropriate, as the Belgium Congo did not exist when Conrad was in the Congo Free State, and Wikipedia has an article on the Congo Free State. Also, the Torrens that Conrad sailed on was not a steam ship, but a clipper ship. While there was a contemporary SS Torrens, it was built as a dredger and later converted to a freighter, and could not have competed with the clipper ship in speed. -- Donald Albury 12:27, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Mill Springs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fort Henry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Traditional Arizona, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native Americans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Bronze Age collapse does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! DKqwerty (talk) 19:19, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
What is the no-destination link in the New Albion page. Was that in error? Shall we clean it up?
A barnstar for you!
|The Minor barnstar|
|Thanks for all of the great work clarifying the language and meaning of articles with small changes! Keep up the great work, and I hope you get an opportunity contributing to our project, with collaborations like the Guild of Copy editors. Sadads (talk) 10:08, 8 November 2015 (UTC)|
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)