User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 36

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

Request Assistance[edit]

I am looking to make sure that I did the deletion nomination process correctly and was hoping you could do some quality assurance for me, I saw you were one of the older and more active admins, so I thought I'd ask you to check Patriotic Nigras and talk:Patriotic Nigras for me. Mahalo in advance :-) Da Killa Wabbit (talk) 19:57, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hello[edit]

could you probably guide me a bit, about starting articles and proving my sources? Ty and sorry if i caused trouble to wiki --AndrewDip (talk) 14:25, 18 July 2009 (UTC) __________________________________________[reply]

The actor Ezra Miller page you deleted[edit]

I am just a reader. Not a writer. In both the Californication, and Royal Pains articles, Ezra Miller is listed as one of the actors. When I click on his link from both pages, it goes to a page that is marked as being DELETED BY YOU..??? When I go to YOUR PAGE, you have a little drop-down that brags about all of the biographic articles that you have written on people. My question is this.... Rather than delete the article on this young actor, which was written by someone else, and apparently didn't meet your "level of standards", why didn't you JUST RE-WRITE it... or mark it as a stub or something... WHY DELETE..? This young actor named Ezra Miller did nothing to deserve this. And I, who came to wikipedia to read about him, am leaving with nothing learned. I hope i filled this out right. is all new to me. not (talk) 21:43, 8 July 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.172.155.67 (talk)

  • The page I deleted was not about Ezra Miller the actor, but some schoolkid (the entire content was "hottest boy alive"). Feel free to create a page about the actor. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:40, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

You recently "delete" the page I created for "The Franklin Party" and I'm not sure why? I believe I had multiple references, my data was accurate, there was no copyright issues, and this is a real political organization which is in the process of registrering in three major states. Please help me with the distinctions I've missed in order to have this page accepted.

Thanks in advance, Brian Boeheim --Bboeheim (talk) 18:20, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]



The "multiple references" were to your own website and book. The independent references that you cited did not mention the Franklin Party. There's no evidence in the article that this party has been recognized as notable (see WP:ORG) by any independent source (see WP:V). Also, this is your party, based on your book, and you therefore shouldn't be the one writing about it. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:33, 2 July 2009

Thanks for the reply - First, I would like to be clear that it is not my party and even though it started from a somewhat fictional place it has become very real with a growing number of regional leaders and followers. Like anything new, it is growing from its point of origin out. That means that all interviews and articles tend to focus on the book at this point. I tried to limit the number of references to the book since my intention is not to promote the book, but instead give a reference for the Franklin Party. If someone else wrote The Franklin Party page would that make the difference? Much of the support for the party is coming via the net since the mainstream media is violently opposed to anything that takes attention away from the Democratic party. Do Blog references provide the notability your suggesting? Please advise...thanks in advance.

--Bboeheim (talk) 19:02, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tiananmen Square Redirect[edit]

Thanks for your assistance on the Tiananment Square issue. A redirect to the appropriate article was, I think, a better solution than my original proposal of deletion. Good call!Simonm223 (talk) 20:51, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Dharma music[edit]

Hi Nawlin. Do you have any objection if I G11 this one that you prodded? It's been tagged for G11 probably for COI, and given the page creator's username (User:Thedharmaleeds) and lack of contributions, I'm leaning in favor of G11. But if you would rather stick with the prod, that's fine. (Watching) - Dank (push to talk) 18:38, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, someone deleted it. - Dank (push to talk) 01:28, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion[edit]

Hi, you deleted an article of mine. I read your list and the closest thing to was, quote "Your independent production company that makes YouTube films." the thing is, How It Should Have Ended is NOT, mine. It also said that I was "Promoting" in my article. If you could qoute a line or two that shows promoting in my article, I will lay off. Thank you HISHEfan (talk) 00:14, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning a schoolblock ...[edit]

Specifically, here [1]. The relevant school year doesn't end until 22 July [2], and they're at it again. Philip Trueman (talk) 14:05, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

strang fish the cambridge album I wonder why you have deleted this item, and why you have not responded to previous msg, this is a unique project, notable because local authoritys do not ushually fund LP records, it was a not for personal profit item where by any raised funds went to the Junction venue (opened 1990) in the city of Cambridge UK, so this was succesfull in it's aim, also you have an item by Fire Department ( the band ) girl girl girl (the track) ? yet you wont allow details about the Album where the track comes from, only 1000 copies of the LP exsist so they are now collecters items, the Ways To Move Tape preceeded the LP, and was again a fund raising and publicity generating item, also the LP was stocked by Rhino records nort hollywood and Arrons record shop melrose, and featured on the SNAP radio show from KCRW via the well known DJ Derdirea O'Donohou, every night for a two week period cica 1989, because she thought it was a quality product and had a good principle behind it, as I have said you can contact me at jayfish07@googlemail.com if you have any other problems with this very noteworthy item, and I would like to re-enter but will wait to hear from you. jay taylor producer strange fish the cambridge album. javascript:insertTags('Jayfish99 (talk) 16:39, 7 July 2009 (UTC)',,)[reply]

Speedy Delete of TopRight[edit]

Ok, I'll try again this. I believe that I have neutralized the content sufficiently and referenced things fine now. Can you specify on the new article what is issue and I'll fix. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nargonne (talk • contribs) 18:29, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete of My topic :([edit]

Hello, a topic I was working on has been deleted without warning. I spent alot of time writing it & citing the links, checking references etc & was coming back to add more. The station is well known in the dark drum & bass scene (music industry) with notable achievements. Im an avid listener & follower since it started nearly 3 years ago. There were no copyright infringements in my article. All references were checked & the article served a purpose of expanding readers knowledge about this subgenre of this style of music. Can you tell me why my article has been delected? And possible give it back so I dont have to write it all out again. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elemental-bass (talk • contribs) 13:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dark Wax Radio topic, any reply on this one? I will have to write it all out again. Thanks

Speedy Delete[edit]

Hello, you deleted my page of Brandon Evans? He is listed as one of BMI's songwriters there is NO need for deletion. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandonn12345 (talk • contribs) 20:29, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote most of the article on the English Reformation some years ago and only today returned to do some work on ibids. etc. I find I cannot and am clearly not an established user. Comment? Roger Arguile

  • Which article is it that you're having trouble editing? NawlinWiki (talk) 04:28, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as lover of Muhammad[edit]

Why, my article is deleted. I have given references. I said in it's talk page that I have not time to edit more but you delete it, I have given the reason to two administers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TZX Master (talk • contribs) 09:44, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion[edit]

Hello, just writing to inform you I'm fine with the deletion of my article FilmCow, but it would have been nice to inform me on my talkpage. I also suggest you read this for future reference. Sincerely, - Kausill Kausill 12:24, 18 July 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Oh btw, click this link. Kausill 12:28, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bhai Sahib Satpal Singh Khalsa[edit]

Hi I didn't understand the comment you put on the article Bhai Sahib Satpal Singh Khalsa User:tariksingh —Preceding undated comment added 18:54, 18 July 2009 (UTC). ( Tariksingh (talk) 19:06, 18 July 2009 (UTC) )[reply]

My Message[edit]

In your message, you have written the words "original research". This is the research that the Muslims, who are the enemies of Ahmadiyya should know that how much the founder of Ahmadiyya loved Muhammad. You said that you have much knowledge about Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, but this article is not about his article. This is another topic. Your research is only on his article. As I said this article topic is not that one about the life of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad but about how much love he had for Muhammad. The Maulvis are spreading in Pakistan and other Islamic countries that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was the enemy of Muhammad, but it is truly wrong. Please, let it article exist. Don't delete it.--TZX Master (talk) 12:19, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Bruces[edit]

Hi, I saw you A7'ed this article. Could you please restore it given that e.g. [3], [4], and [5] indicate that the group passes WP:N and WP:MUSIC? Thanks Chubbles (talk) 03:23, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The article I deleted was not about a music group; it began "The Bruces are a well known guild in WoW (World of Warcraft)". Feel free to create an article on the music group. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 16:39, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of PROD from Austin Ainge[edit]

Hello NawlinWiki, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Austin Ainge has been removed. It was removed by 38.97.97.99 with the following edit summary '(no edit summary)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with 38.97.97.99 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 19:51, 21 July 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)[reply]

hoax page[edit]

You referred to a page as a "hoax" referencing Sidd Finch. I had no idea who that was till you brought it to my attention, I really was talking about a person named Sydney Finch. I simply wrote the article about a news series I discovered and thought I provided the appropriate links for everyone to verify. Hopefully you followed the links to see that I wasn't hoaxing anyone, the name is a coincidence. I would appreciate you looking into this before the article is reposted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smithcas000 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of PROD from Bechara Nammour[edit]

Hello NawlinWiki, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Bechara Nammour has been removed. It was removed by LoverOfTheRussianQueen with the following edit summary '(there are 3 references in reliable sources)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with LoverOfTheRussianQueen before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 22:06, 21 July 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)[reply]


Removal of Spreety[edit]

Hello NawlinWiki,

With regards to a recent post on "Spreety", there is a question of importance or significance.

The significance of Spreety is that it lists only the legal places to watch TV online. This is very different from Sidereel, TVDuck, and others, which

list the less than legal places.

As for importance:

- Over 2 million people have enjoyed the Spreety site in the past year.

- Quantcast has Spreety ranked around 6,500 in the U.S.

- Google ranks Spreety on or near the front page for watch tv shows online, tv shows online, watch TV shows, online tv free, watch tv free, western tv, etc.

- As a word that did not exist two years ago, Google returns over 203,000 results for Spreety.

- Backlinks to Spreety include top 500 sites, like OVGuide and Apple.com.

A professional journalist writes articles for Spreety about entertainment, plus there is an entire e-book about optimal ways to watch TV online on the site.

I would very kindly request the consideration of acceptance of such a short entry.

Kind regards,

RonLaughton (talk) 18:25, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Kideos.com Article[edit]

Hi NawlinWiki, you recently deleted an article of mine. I read your list and am very familiar with the 5 pillars of Wikipedia. Furthermore, several websites in the same children's space as Kideos.com have Wikipedia pages. For instance, FunBrain, Kidzui and FactMonster are currently on Wikipedia. Kideos.com is a legitimate website that has been featured in such authoritative publications as AdWeek, AOL Money and MediaWeek. Thank you for your attention to this matter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Duke81 (talk • contribs) 18:56, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Duke81 (talk) 23:03, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

have a life?[edit]

I hope you get paid for what you do. Seriously you are fast. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ltapia (talk • contribs) 21:51, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Some Help Please[edit]

Simply deleting pages outright is not always helpful especially when more than one person has make edits. If you find a phrase or word you don't like or have political feelings against could you just edit it rather than deleting the whole page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nargonne (talk • contribs) 13:39, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Filter 52[edit]

Hi, I've disabled filter 52 per Wikipedia talk:Edit filter#Filter 52 - Edit summary vandalism II. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:44, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Fair point on the run time, but this is an important filter that successfully dealt with some problems that were very difficult to deal with any other way. I will try to narrow it down to reduce both the run time and the false positives. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:12, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Edited, under 6 ms, reenabled. If you can think of other ways to reduce the runtime, I'd appreciate it. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:35, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why? :([edit]

Hi, I was hoping I could still save my very first article by having a little more time, I may not know the reason why it was unworthy to be an article or perhaps I was very uninformed of your rules, If I may suggest helping me by talking to me :'(

--JoshuaCruzPhilippines (talk) 09:36, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Thanks for your response :) perhaps I'll start from somewhere safe. I'm new here, I'd be glad to help, Salamat, Thank you, Gracias, Merci,
--JoshuaCruzPhilippines (talk) 17:08, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MyVoucherCodes.co.uk Article Deleted[edit]

Hi, could you please explain why was this article removed? MyVoucherCodes.co.uk is biggest UK Discount Vouchers site, I thought that that is significant enough. Plus, I have written my articles to look and feel like articles about websites that are being published, like the article about Reviewcentre.com, which is by every measure smaller than MyVoucherCodes AND less significant, with unrelated links etc., which my article did not have. Thank you.Michael L. Wright (talk) 15:24, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • The Reviewcentre.com article is supported by multiple independent sources which show the site's notability per WP:WEB. You've got two independent sources -- one review on what appears to be a blog, and one traffic award saying that the site is #9 in the UK in a given category of website (not overall). I don't see how these meet WP:WEB or WP:V as of yet. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:55, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your answer. MyVoucherCodes.co.uk has been mentioned in hundreds of authority newspaper articles and radio and TV apperences, please see list bellow for very few examples. I agree that I could have choose the independent sources better. Is there any possibility to re-post this article about www.myvouchercodes.co.uk with souces updated? Thank you.

Michael L. Wright (talk) 16:32, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • These all appear to be mentions of myvouchercodes as a product, generally in long lists of products. Do you have any sources that are actually news articles whose *subject* is myvouchercodes? NawlinWiki (talk) 16:47, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply. As I mentioned, there has been hundreds of articles mentioning MyVoucherCodes.co.uk in the newspapers so it took mi little while to find some that the SUBJECT is myvouchercodes or that speak about myvouchercodes as the main subject. Here are some:

http://www.independent.co.uk/money/spend-save/where-to-log-on-for-the-best-yuletide-bargains-761565.html

The article talks about Discount Codes beside other things, here is citation from it: Niche ways of saving you cash online are evolving all the time, and services such as voucher code websites are increasingly popular. Myvouchercodes.co.uk seems to have led this particular stampede, and offers simple online retail lists that provide you with a discount code to enter along with your card details once you have decided what you want from where. They will even open a link to the retailers' website for you. If all this sounds like your kind of shopping solution, you had better get on with it. Going electronic with your shopping means you could be buying from anywhere in the world, and you won't be popular if gifts don't arrive until mid January. Having said that, if you're ordering from a UK online retailer, last delivery dates are getting later every year. Amazon's last Christmas order date for free delivery is 18 December, but if you're willing to pay, it says you can make orders right up to 8.30am on Christmas Eve, and still receive them by the end of the day.

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/online-grocery-shopping-overtakes-sales-of-electronic-goods-975831.html This article is only about MyVoucherCodes.co.uk

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/savings/article4968283.ece Citation of MyVoucherCodes spokesman as authority: The economic meltdown has opened up the best buying opportunities for years in property, the markets and even the high street. Consumers are taking advantage of discounts of 70% or more discounts from high-street retailers, where sales are down 1.5% compared with last year, according to the British Retail Consortium. A spokesman for myvouchercodes.co.uk, a discount website, said: “Consumers are looking for savings much, much earlier this year and retailers have cottoned on to this and reacted accordingly.”

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/consumer_affairs/article1620050.ece This article is about MyVoucherCodes.co.uk only

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/624f1e90-bd71-11dd-bba1-0000779fd18c.html This article is about MyVoucherCodes.co.uk and moneysavingexpert.com

Please reconsider deletion of our article about myvouchercodes.co.uk. Thank you. Michael L. Wright (talk) 09:23, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

The Admin's Barnstar
I, Javert, hereby award you, NawlinWiki, the Admin's Barnstar to express my gratitude for the fantastic work you do in a "particular area" of "the job" and to let you know that your work is very much appreciated. Javert I knit sweaters, yo! 21:20, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

review site[edit]

hi. i disagree with yet understand the conflict of interest you are citing in regards to my update of the adrian belew page. i do indeed run the site that i was linking to. i would, however, make a request of you: if you're going to delete the link to this review then please delete the links to the others as well. there's about ten of them in total.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dgkfhkfhjfhla (talk • contribs) 12:42, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Request for others to spam removed. I'll look at the other links. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:45, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

*Ding*[edit]

I've sent you an email. :) Best, JavertI knit sweaters, yo! 22:05, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Meet Julie[edit]

Awwww... you smacked it.

I feel Alicia and her User:190.80.195.156 are heading for the one-way train to Blocktown quite soon, if they keep on with this unreferenced presumably-hoaxy stuff. I wonder why people bother. Why not spend the same amount of effort on actually doing something constructive, instead of taking the piss? Cheers, Tonywalton Talk 22:42, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Radio Noize[edit]

Hi, you've deleted my page relating to Radio Noize, the student radio station of University of Wales, Newport yet kept the articles for other student radio? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonro87 (talk • contribs) 00:36, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unlock please[edit]

Please unlock the Bolivia article. Thank you. Acme Plumbing (talk) 02:18, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't answer but thank you for doing it. Acme Plumbing (talk) 03:57, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wishes to leave[edit]

Hi, Wikipedia may not be the place for me. how do I delete my account and my photo? so I don't eat bandwidth use. merci! JoshuaCruzPhilippines 16:53, 27 July 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjcruz (talk • contribs)


Thank you[edit]

Please do remove me, Merci beaucoup NawlinWiki :D good bye guys. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjcruz (talk • contribs) 16:58, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry[edit]

Haha, sorry, mate. Was just trying to see if that vandal would notice his talk page was altered. Regards, --UNSC Trooper (talk) 18:25, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship[edit]

Hi, my name is Tarheel95. and I've been considering adminship for quite a while now. I've asked a few admins for tips on what to do before my RfA. I was wondering if you could share your thoughts on the subject. Thank you! Tarheel95 (talk) 18:31, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IP[edit]

(To the guy who deleted this section, I'd only like to report a vandal.) Hello again. This guy's been repetitive in his vandalism after I reverted his unconstructive edits to some political infoboxes. Is there any way you could please block him or something, before he continues reverting my corrections to the infoboxes? Thanks. --UNSC Trooper (talk) 20:55, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Jack Jersawitz Article[edit]

Hi, I was trying to make an article for the host of Brainstorms on People TV, Inc. and it was deleted. I would like to recreate the article and improve on it but I don't want it to be deleted again. Could you please help me with this? Thank you. -bonkeykong —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bonkeykong (talk • contribs) 21:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Guy[edit]

Hi NawlinWiki, the above article that you deleted earlier today has been re-created by the user you warned. Accurizer (talk) 23:28, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Troxler Electronics Lab[edit]

You deleted my article on Troxle Electronic Lab. I think you should have nominated it for deletion instead of just doing it yourself. Crwesq@gmail.com (talk) 01:00, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Google Love[edit]

I agree that the initial article about Google Love was written as an unambiguous sales pitch, however I saw value in an article about the term, referring to this term in the way it is being used in articles and blogs on the internet. I referenced the article accordingly and thought it was quite thorough. I accept that this term may indeed be a neologism (as most internet marketing terminology by the very nature technologies rapid development is). My question is this - what are the criteria for a neologism to be viewed as a valuable addition to Wikipedia? talk 09:10 29 July 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cosmicsqueaker (talk • contribs) 08:11, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jellybass[edit]

Please can you re-instate this page, as it has now been editied to include verification of the artist Jellybass, and the Genre section which could not be verified has been removed. Thanks. User:Chix —Preceding undated comment added 15:02, 28 July 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Oversight[edit]

Have you considered getting that little lot oversighted? Uncle G (talk) 15:27, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OmapZoom[edit]

Hello, I'm trying to put in wiki entry on OMAP Zoom2 device from Texas Instruments. It is an open source device where developers from the open source community can develop software on. Beagle board is a similar device available and that has an entry already on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beagleboard so, I would like to publish the article "OmapZoom". Can you please revese your decision to "speedily delete" the page? Thanks -Ngunasekera.

Christopher Guy page deleted[edit]

Hi. You have deleted two entries of mine on Christopher Guy, an internationally known furniture designer. I realize they need to be re-written in such a manner to not sound like advertisements. I will take the time to revise the content. I just want to see if you have any pointers on what I should do so it won't get deleted again and I definitely don't want to be warned/blocked. I reviewed all the wikipedia rules, including the Wikipedia 5 pillars. Christopher Guy is a worthy article of importance. He is intertionally known all over the world for his signature furniture designs. He trademarked his Chris-x(kris-kros) chair design and has been featured in numerous box-office hits and in signature hotels here in the US and abroad. I carefully reviewed this list of furniture designers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_furniture_designers and see now how the article should be written. Please let me know if you have any suggestions. Thanks Vanoverbaken (talk) 17:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Integer Group page deleted[edit]

We have been trying to create a page for awhile and it keeps getting deleted. I don't want to be warned/blocked but I have reviewed the Wikipedia rules especially those on spam. Could you help me understand what is wrong with the page you have deleted? I see that it is marked as unambiguous advertising. However, I have reviewed pages for other advertising agencies such as; Crispin Porter + Bogusky, Saatchi & Saatchi, Bartle Bogle Hegarty, DraftFCB, Wieden+ Kennedy, and Abbott Mead Vickers BBDO, and I don't see the difference between their pages and the one I am trying to create. Could you please help me see the difference and let me know what to change? I am not trying to promote the company or advertise its expertise. I just feel that those who seek information about advertising agencies such as DraftFCB or The Integer Group should be able to have access to that information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by IntegerCO (talk • contribs) 21:43, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MyVoucherCodes.co.uk Article Deleted 2[edit]

Hi Nawlin, would you please reply to "new authority sources" you requested for article about MyVoucherCodes.co.uk? I know that you are american, but Independent, Times and Financial Times are all big newspapers and are regarded as an authority generaly. Could you tell me if I can resubmit my article with new authority sources? Thank you. Michael L. Wright (talk) 10:17, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DO-IT (UW) page deleted[edit]

I created a small stub about an organization that I believed to be notable. It has been in several news sources over the years and is known in Washington state and Japan. For 2 years it was a nation-wide organization but it had to shrink due to funding problems. It has shrunken a tad bit more due to more funding problems (the recession and budget deficits meant that corporations and government offices could not supply as much money this year as before). It is affiliated with very notable people and organizations. I apologize for any inconveniences. By the way, someone with more wiki experience (I have only made one wikia article, edited a handful of wikia articles and edited a couple of Wikipedia articles and made one Wikipedia article that was deleted after a day), most likely a DO-IT scholar, might make a worthy article. Azemocram (talk) 21:28, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Charity Checks page deleted[edit]

I see that you are very quick to delete pages. The one that I was attempting to create was up for less than five minutes before you deleted it. The organization I was writing about is a legitimate nonprofit, like many that have Wikipedia pages. The references I was adding were to newspaper clippings and television news stories about the work that it does to help children learn about philanthropy. I put it up on my own User Page so that I could make sure I got it right and ask for feedback before trying to publish it under the name "Charity Checks." I was in the process of correcting the footnote format when I got the message the page had already been removed. While I understand your authority to do so, I am left wondering how anyone is supposed to learn if even User Pages can be pulled down so quickly and without warning. --Nordnik (talk) 02:06, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What?! User pages can be deleted also! Well there is only one fix to that: learn the wiki formatting, write up the page using notepad or something like that, save the file on your computer (and upload it somewhere if you want to), then finally create the page. Azemocram (talk) 07:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

zenziC (Band) page deleted[edit]

Why was this band's page deleted? It took me roughly one hour to make the page as presentable as possible only to find out that 5 minutes later, all the information I wrote from scratch based on the band's website was deleted. (User:Dawnclover)

Thank you and interesting page[edit]

Thank you for your action. I have another request. I saw an interesting page for sockpuppets. What a funny name!

This person is blocked even though the checkuser closed the case and filed it in the archives. User: 83.109.100.230 See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Wiki-11233/Archive

This person was cleared but also remains blocked. User:Gasp2009 See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Azviz as well as User talk:Gasp2009

Is there a chief administrator that makes sure these loose ends are fixed? Acme Plumbing (talk) 04:15, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You removed the article: Diamond Wholesale Corporation" (DWC Inc.) with speed...[edit]

I asked once and did not get any answers, so I thought I ask again. You have removed the article I wrote about the "Diamond Wholesale Corporation" because you did not see the significance. Matter of opinion...could one argue.

What I don't understand is: Why is it the article of their direct competitor "Blue Nile Inc." published and obviously significant enough? This is more then unfair....don't you think?

I would really appreciate your answer. Thanking you in advance, with

best wishes,

50Horses --50Horses (talk) 13:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Censorship in Israel[edit]

Hello, why you removed it? We have category:Censorship by country and 4-5 articles which will be in the category "Censorship in Israel" david1955 (talk) 14:11, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The link to : IgnatianSpirituality.com from 'Society of Jesus'[edit]

On the page IgnatianSpirituality.com you will find a lot of articles about Society of Jesus, Spiritual Exercises and Ignatious of Loyola. Could I put a link from these sites to IgnatianSpirituality.com ? It is not spamming ! You can visit the page and see what it says ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyborggg (talk • contribs) 14:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • If you're only here to post links to your website, you shouldn't be here. Please see WP:SPAM. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm here because I read wiki everyday and I want to have here good links like this one. You can really check and see that on IgnatianSpirituality.com there are a lot articles about Society of Jesus - Jesuits, Spiritual Exercises and Ignatius of Loyola. Besides IgnatianSpirituality.com is one of the official sites of Society of Jesus (founded by Ignatius of Loyola - the author of the Spiritual Exercises). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyborggg (talk • contribs) 18:25, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal enabling[edit]

I see you've reverted all the edits of a vandal fighter who was reverting the edits of an "indefinitely blocked vandal"[6]. As I am that indef blocked vandal, what can I say but thank you? KillerChihuahua?!?Advice 19:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I particularly like this edit summary... J.delanoygabsadds 19:37, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What can I say? Jimmy is my sockpuppet!!! KillerChihuahua?!?Advice 19:46, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Triumph of Truth[edit]

Hi NawlinWiki this in Penright here, I really do not understand why you deleted my article Triumph of Truth (Who's Watching The Watchers?) on the basis that it is an add trying to sell something, This does not make any sense when the subject matter of the article is about a series of books that were written in the 1980's and early 1990's and have been destroyed by the state library and the state police. This is a history article about a series of books that do not exist any more, but a story that has to go on public record in the public interest, it is not selling anything, please explain what you think the article is trying to sell. I do expect a proper detailed reason and explanation for you decision to instantly delete this article without even a general discussion on the talk page as to why you think it should not be allowed to exist on Wikipedia. I have had of experience in courts over the years where one has to explain the reason why certain actions are taken, even a high court judge has to do this when he makes a judgement, so you are acting as judge, jury and executioner for this article Triumph of Truth (Who's Watching The Watchers?) and you have tried the case overseen the hearing as the judge, found the article guilty acting as the jury and then instantly executed al the life out of the article with a final death sentence, no appeals, no discussions, and no detailed reason as to why you think this article is guilty of trying to sell something, when the subject matter is clearly history and not talking about any good, service product that is available for sale today, as the Western Australian State Library destroyed their copies of these books and the Queensland Police have stolen the original manuscripts and refuse to hand them back. NawlinWiki, I look forward to your detailed answer. Kindest regards PenrightPenright (talk) 21:48, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pain Hertz[edit]

  • Hi - I noticed you speedy deleted this article without even tagging it for speedy deletion first. I was in the midst of adding some more information to it when you did this - it hasn't even been 10 minutes since I created it. How did you even delete it without tagging it first? Please reinstate it so we can see if anyone else agrees that it should not be speedy deleted.
  • As per Wikipedia:New pages patrol, Tagging anything other than attack pages or complete nonsense a minute after creation is not constructive and only serves to annoy the page author..
  • Also In particular, an article should not be tagged for speedy delete using A7 for not being notable (in your opinion): an article does not have to prove that its subject is notable, it only has give a reasonable indication of why it might be notable (whether it actually is notable is a subject for an AfD discussion, not a speedy deletion). Consider using a Notability tag instead of a speedy delete tag. Also, an article should not be tagged for speedy deletion if it's possible that it might be improved into an article which should be kept. Pay attention to the guideline "Contributors sometimes create articles over several edits, so try to avoid deleting a page too soon after its creation if it appears incomplete." It is not a rule of Wikipedia that an article has to be perfect the instant it's first posted; that's why we have edits..
  • Please reinstate the page so that this can be discussed. Luminifer (talk) 23:38, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • In summary, articles that are not suited for wikipedia are not to be speedy deleted, but are to be tagged with AfD. Unsuitable pages. Pages about individuals, places, or things which generally don't merit an encyclopedia entry should be tagged with PROD or, if someone could reasonably defend its existence (or if a prod has been added and removed already), listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. What exactly qualifies as encyclopedic is debatable, though, so it's best to err on the side of caution and not delete or nominate for deletion too hastily. Luminifer (talk) 23:39, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi - I don't believe I have to establish notability to not have it speedily deleted, according to all of the policies I have read. You can tag is with AfD if you like, but it should not have been speedy deleted. Wikipedia policy clearly states that a page should not be speedy deleted just because it is not up to par - some pages require the cumulative efforts of many wikipedians to establish significant notability. Can you show me where in the speedy deletion policy it says that possibly unnotability is a valid sole criterion for speedy deletion? Also, can you explain why it was never even first tagged for speedy deletion? Thanks. Luminifer (talk) 04:37, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Specifically, you cited A7 as the reason for deletion, but A7 explicitly states it is weaker than notablity: An article about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools), or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. The article I created did do that. Luminifer (talk) 04:41, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Also, please follow the suggestion at the top of my talk page and respond here rather than on my talk page.. Thanks. Luminifer (talk) 05:22, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Per speedy delete category a7, an article can be speedily deleted if it doesn't *assert* notability. As I said, I don't see how your article asserted notability per WP:MUSIC. "6 albums" doesn't assert notability, because lots of nonnotable bands have 6 self-produced albums. Finally, administrators are not required to tag articles for speedy deletion if they believe that the article meets the speedy-delete criteria -- they can just go ahead and delete. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:14, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      • Once again, I quote from A7: An article about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools), or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. This is distinct from verifiability and reliability of sources, and is a lower standard than notability. . It specifically states it only needs to assert important, which my article does. Please reinstate it. Also, even though administrators don't need to tag the articles first, it is generally polite to do so... Thanks. Luminifer (talk) 06:02, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Triumph Of Truth (Who Is Watching The Watchers that are Watching new Wiki Edits and articles?[edit]

Copy to of letter to Editor of the News York TimesDear Sir, I still have not had a reply yet from NawlinWiki an administrator on Wikipedia to my question. I am surprised that there is no rely, when he or she was so quick to remove the article, like the Kitten was sitting there watching minute my minute "Daily Kitten is watching"ready to pounce on the Triumph of Truth, because the series of books Triumph of Truth (Who Is Watching The Watchers?) are apparently:(1)not allowed to be a book in a public Library, even though they were purchased with public money for the Western Australian JS Battye Library, by a very senior experienced Western Australian library historian, that felt that as he said to me, when he decided to order a number of copies of the seven volumes of Triumph Of Truth (Who Is Watching The Watchers?) when I asked him why is he originally ordered them he said, "it was in the public interests of the people of Western Australia to have the alternative view of the legal, political, public trustee, police, courts, prosecution, business world on public record", (2) not allowed to even he stored in garage of a private home, so when the police come to the house at 6 Earl Court looking for documents that relate to real estate transactions in Tallai, Queensland, and they find the seven volumes of Triumph of Truth (Who Is Watching The Watchers?)the police immediately decide that these books are illegal books and no one should have them in their house as they may corrupt the minds of those that read them, and thus have to be removed immediately and destroyed, before anyone else reads the mind corrupting information that is written in these books (3) Not allowed to be mentioned in any normal mainstream newspaper, encyclopaedia etc, so the author has to go to his grave without anyone ever knowing about these books, so that when he dies the world will never know that these books ever existed, as the world is not allowed to know that these books have ever existed, just like the JS Battye Library had to completely destroy these books and even take all copies of ''Triumph of Truth (Who Is Watching The Watchers?)'', purchased by the JS Battye LibraryLink title, off the library computer of them , and the police had to remove and destroy the original manuscripts of the seven volumes of ''Triumph of Truth (Who Is Watching The Watchers?)'' when they were discovered by the police stored in the garage of a private home , this all being done without any official court order and/or official authority an/or official rule of any law in Australia that these people were using to remove and destroy the seven volumes of ''Triumph of Truth (Who Is Watching The Watchers?)'', so that, other that the author who sold them to the Library, and a few close associates, no one would ever know that they ever existed in the [[JS Battye Library]] and in fact in the world. It seems that The Triumph of TruthLink title that ''Sir Edgar Bertram Mackennal'', the great grand father of the author of the seven volumes of ''Triumph of Truth (Who Is Watching The Watchers?)'' , Stephen Carew-Reid, tried to create in the 1980's is still having a hard time existing, however in the laws of the universe, The Truth Will Always Triumph, one way or another. Kindest regards, M Moore (code name Penright)Penright (talk) 06:39, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Triumph of Truth Not For Sale

This is the short reply from NawinWiki 10 minutes after the first reply was sent requesting a full explanation as to why the article on the seven volumes of ''Triumph of Truth (Who S Watching The Watchers?)'' was tagged for speedy deletion and to explain the speedy deletion in the light of "Wikipedia policy which clearly states that a page should not be speedy deleted, just because it is not up to par - some pages require the cumulative efforts of many wikipedians to establish significant notability. Can you show me where in the speedy deletion policy it says that possibly unnotability is a valid sole criterion for speedy deletion?" (See: Pain Hertz's similar complaint above regarding the speedy deletion of his article) NawinWiki's short reply:"You're trying to publicize your own books. Moreover, those books don't appear to have any independent notability per WP:N and WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:58, 30 July 2009 (UTC)". Please respond in much more detailed and sensible argument and valid reasons to the two detailed replies to you, as to why you, with such hast and vigour, tagged for speedy deletion the article of the seven volumes of ''Triumph of Truth (Who S Watching The Watchers?)''. Please be kind enough to also provide your reply on your own talk page (This page, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NawlinWiki&action=edit) and please also explain why, when I was editing the original article in the SandBox section, the drafts that I worked hard on, started, after a few hours of working on the page, to disappear every 12 seconds, and the Wikipedia Policy on top of the SandBox page states that the edits on the SandBox pages will be removed every 12 hours, not every 12 seconds. Then I go back to the Sandbox page to have another try, to create the article again, and there is a message typed by yourself, being the admin editor on duty at the time checking new edits and new articles being drafted, in the edit section, that "the edits on this page will be removed every 12 seconds". The meaning behind this message was clear. No matter what I was to write in the SandBox edit page and/or in an actual article on a main Wikipedia page, you and those who you are fronting for have already decided to speadily delete the edit and/or article. The message is clear that the subject matter that involves the now destroyed the seven volumes of Triumph of Truth (Who S Watching The Watchers?), that are not for sale, as they simply do not exist anymore, but their original existence can be easily verified by speaking to the main political historian that was in charge of the ordering of the seven volumes of ''Triumph of Truth (Who S Watching The Watchers?)'' at the JS Battye Library, also by search in all the references and links that have been provided suporting the article, as well as reading the article on the Old Boys Melbourne High Schol page that has been on the internet for over 12 year, (Please See: Google search on Stephen Carew-Reid MHSOBA 1907-2009 :: Luncheon Club - 8 July Stephen Carew-Reid - arguing with the Judiciary ... Instead his father John Hastings Carew-Reid talked him into comming back to Perth WA and taking over the. www.mhsoba.asn.au/default.asp?pg=luncheon&spg... - Cached - Similar - )at http://www.mhsoba.asn.au/default.asp?pg=luncheon&spg=display&articleid=2266 "

Stephen Carew-Reid - arguing with the Judiciary

-Stephen went to Christ Church Grammer School until 1962 when his family moved to Melbourne. There he attended Brighton Grammer School from 1963 to 1969. In 1970 he attended Melbourne High School and received a Commonwealth Scholarship to attend Melbourne University to complete a Law Degree. Instead his father John Hastings Carew-Reid talked him into comming back to Perth WA and taking over the family stone business and completing a Bachelor of Commerce Degree during the years 1971-75. Stephen received 75% of the family company worth about $8,000 in compensation to his other two brothers and one sister receiving about $20,000 to start their adult life with. Stephen built this company up with wise real estate investments from $8,000 in value to over $500,000 by the end of the 1970's. Stephen wanted to develop these properties himself and make a further $1 million development profit by building town houses and offices on the land. During his university days he rented all the rooms out in the houses to pay for the mortgages, had two children and was one of the 8 selected out of over 2,000 entries to fly to Melbourne to be part of the Johny Young Song Festival. His father took control of the company back from Stephen by issuing an extra 5,000 shares now it was very valuable and stopped Stephen from developing the house himself and in fact sold the house to a property developer who made $1 million profit. His father died in 1986 and left the WA Public Trustee as executor of this will. Stephen ended up sueing the Public Trustee for mishandling the etate and ended up representing himself for over a decade in the WA Courts against the Public Trustee who used their power of City Hall against him. Stephen has ended up having his practical expereince in the courts before he did any formal training and has now written a series of books about the fight he has had with the WA Public Trustee and the WA Government called, ''The Triumph of Truth (Who S Watching the Watchers).'' The books have been named after his late Great Grand Father, Sir Edgar Bertram McKennal who was well known bronze sculpter in the earty 1900's in Melbourne who went on to becoming quite famous in Europe. Before he left Melbourne to further his art in Europe, he won a competition sponcered by well knbwon business men to produce a life size sculpter to be placed outside the Art Gallery. He called his entry "The Triumph of Truth". He only ever did a small clay version for the entry because the prise money never came forward form the businessmen to finance him to complete the life size sculpter.His Great Grand Father was searching for the Truth in his art and now Stephen is searching for the truth in his books to carry on his Great Grand Father's work in a different form." as clearly explained in the article, so you you to tag the article on the seven volumes of ''Triumph of Truth (Who S Watching The Watchers?)'' for speedy deletion, on the basis of your false and wrongful claim that I am promoting my own books, in the Wikipedia article, makes no sense at all, when they are not my books and in any event as the article says they have been destroyed, first by the JS Battye on instructions of the Western Australian Crown Law Department without any court order and/or rule of law authority, and then the original manuscripts have been taken and destroyed by the Queensland police in Australia, again without any court order and/or Australian Rule Of Law to support such actions. This article could never be accused of being about myslef and/or anyone else using Wikipedia to promote the seven volumes of ''Triumph of Truth (Who Is Watching The Watchers?)'', because, as set out in the article, they simply do not exist any more. The article is just a history article about the history of events that took place in Western Australia in the late 1980's and early 1990's, being over 15 years ago, and it is clearly in the public interest that this piece of important Western Australian History go on permanent public record in Wikipedia, for the world to read for generations to come, so that the truth is there to be read, not hidden from everyone for ever. That is the main purpose, Jimmy Wales, who has been historically cited as being the co-founder of Wikipedia, had for the founding of Wikipedia, for the truth about all subjects to be on public record for ever. Kindest Regards M.Moore (Code Penright)Penright (talk) 08:10, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Best regards M.Moore (Code Penright)Penright (talk) 08:32, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Penright (talk) 10:19, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • You wrote "it is clearly in the public interest that this piece of important Western Australian History go on permanent public record in Wikipedia, for the world to read for generations to come, so that the truth is there to be read, not hidden from everyone for ever." That's your opinion. We don't go by an article author's opinion -- we go by reliable independent sources. If you don't have any, post your information on your own website, not here. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:11, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NawlinWiki, great to hear your personal opinion of he subject matter of the article about the seven volumes of Triumph of Truth (Who Is Watching The Watchers?) and that you have agreed with me finally that the article is not attempting to sell anything, as the article is just a history article about some of the interesting history of Western Australia, just like you must have some interesting history in New Orleans, USA where you were born and still live. I may not think that the history that you may chose to write about about events, people, places etc that relate to New Orleans, USA in Wikipedia are interesting and noteworthy enough to be included in Wikipedia, however that would be only my personal opinion, not necessary the opinion of the hundreds and thousands of other editors that contribute to Wikipedia around the world. In this case you have now come out of the cupboard and admitted the real real reason why you have made it your personal mission place a tag for speedy deletion to the article about the seven volumes of Triumph of Truth (Who Is Watching The Watchers?), is that you do not like the subject matter and may consider that the subject matter isn't noteworthy enough, and you have chose to attack the 30 references and sources I quoted in the article which include the following: References: 1. James Battye Library, Western Australia Editions of the Australian Weekend News, on microfilm at the James Battye Library 2. Editions of the Australian Weekend News, compliments of the Australian Weekend News Publishing Group and International News Limited 3. Seven volumes of books knows as Triumph of Truth (Who Is Watching The Watchers? written by Stephen Carew-Reid and published by the Australian Weekend News 4. Website:www.INLNews.com Website: www.USAWeeklyNews.com 5. Website: www.whois watchingthewatchers.com 6. Australian Weekend News websites: www,awn.bz, www.australianweekendnews.com, www.newscorp.net 7. Interviews with Stephen Carew-Reid and other staff at the Australian Weekend News, USA Weekly News and INL News Limited and International News Limited 8. Historical records of the old Daily-Weekend News published in Perth, Western Australia 9. Historical records of the West Australian Newspaper, published in Perth Western Australia and held on micro Film at the James Battye Library in Perth Western Australia. 10. Interviews with staff at the James Battye Library in Perth Western Australia 11. Interviews with the residents and owner of 6 Earl Court Tallai, 12. Queensland Queensland Police records held in Queensland, Australia 13. Statements from Queensland Senior Detectives Gregory Stormont and Barry Zerner Letters 14. Records, receipts and correspodence from the Queensland Police Service in Australia 15. Local Court of Western Australia records 16. Magistrate Court of Western Australia records 17. District Court of Western Australia records 18. Supreme Court of Western Australia records 19. Federal court of Australia records 20. High Court of Australia records 21. Public Trustee of Western Australia records 22. Director of Public Prosecution records 23. Western Australian Titles Office at Midland records 24. Western Australian Police Service records 25. Mosman Park Shire council records 26. Interviews with Lloyd Carew-Reid 27. Interview with Wayne Carew-Reid 28. Interviews with Pippen Drysdale 29. Interviews with Paul Rigby 30. Historical records of the Sunday Times Newspaper published in Perth Western Australia. I do challenge you over your claim that the article is not note worthy enough non of these sources and reference are not reliable enough to make this article be be included in Wikipedia and I ask you you discuss this with say 10,000 other Wikipedian editors in the Wikipedian community, and take a vote on it and get a conscientious of opinion from them all. If you can not get a general agreement from these 10,000 editors in the Wikipedian community, then take a vote and I suppose the majority vote wins the day, one way or another. I hereby did attached a copy of the article to show the 10,000 other wikipedian editors you are going toi approach to take a vote on the Wikipedean future or non future of the subject matter that is is the article entitled Triumph of Truth (Who Is Watching The Watchers?), that you have tagged for speedy deletion by yourself that was indeed very speedily deleted in a few seconds: Triumph Of Truth (Who Is Watching The Watchers?) however that section iof my editr on this page was tagged for speedy deletion, and speedily delected within the usuaol 12 second time frame that is allowed for any that I put up on wikipedia under the tile suject matter Triumph Of Truth (Who Is Watching The Watchers?). Kindest regards M.Moore ( Wikipedia Code Penright)Penright (talk) 17:26, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The appropriate place to dispute a speedy deletion is at deletion review. This will allow other editors, including admins, to review the deletion, as you desire. Vicenarian (Said · Done) 17:33, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HiNawlinWiki I hereby give you notice of my lodgement of Deletion Review for he page name Triumph of Truth (Who Is Watching The Watchers?) a==Deletion review for Triumph of Truth (Who s Watching The Watchers?)== An editor has asked for a deletion review of Triumph of Truth (Who s Watching The Watchers?). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Penright (talk) 18:08, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Joey hoffman[edit]

Thanks for deleting the "Joey hoffman" article. Since this is at least the third time this article has been recreated by User:Ablinn87 and the user has been previously warned at User talk:Ablinn87, you might want to consider imposing a user block. Truthanado (talk) 14:34, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Article "Brandner Communications" - Request for Editorial Assistance[edit]

Hi, Please advise about deletion of this article. This is my first and I want to respect the Wikipedia guidelines. Attempted to make it neutral without a specific point of view. Am open to your suggestions, or would be willing to send you a revised version for consideration.

Thanks.

TB2120 (talk) 14:54, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted a page of a company that was purely informational. (Atlona Technologies)[edit]

I would like to petition or start some review process of your decision. What was llisted was our company information only, there are no sales pitches or product listings, nor does it reffer to the company as us or our. I believe you deletion was in error, minor edits maybe, but i do not see a cause to delete it entirely. this page practically mirrors that of companies such as Extron or Kramer, both of which have a Wiki page listing information. Please let me know if this is something I should take up with you, or if I need to talk to other administrators to have this overturned. thank you.

~Christopher Bundy —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maflash (talk • contribs) 20:31, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Quoting from the article: "Whether your application is for professional broadcast, or a home theater installation, Atlona Technologies has you covered." See WP:SPAM. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:37, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That is Atlona's Slogan. It's on the business card too. Like I said, minor edits as in "their slogan:Whether your application is for professional broadcast, or a home theater installation, Atlona Technologies has you covered." but I don't believe the whole article was written like this. Also it took less than a minute to be reviewed and deleted. I do not think that i could have been read entirely in this time. That was in the 1st paragraph. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maflash (talk • contribs) 20:58, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    • More quotes from the article:
"Atlona’s products in general differ from that of their competition in price and quality, as well as implementation of unique features that add value over the competition."
"Atlona Technologies is a dynamic manufacturing company poised on the bleeding edge of Audio Video technology. Atlona Has been consistently first to market without sacrificing quality or using the field to test new products, unlike their competitors."
This is why you shouldn't be writing about your own company. See WP:COI. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:01, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, Nawlin, for continuing to interject, but - Maflash, if you'd like the deletion of this article reviewed, please see deletion review. I would also advise that you do read those two policies before making a request over there, as I suspect the deletion would be endorsed upon review. Vicenarian (Said · Done) 21:04, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

speedy deletion of page labelled as 'hoax' (bashar)[edit]

Aloha!

Can you please provide me with information regarding your decision to label 'bashar' as a hoax? What is a hoax to one person is most assuredly not a hoax to another person. Having listened to hundreds of hours of bashar material and also having quite deeply explored consciousness, ET interactions and a vast spectrum of related ideas and information I can confidently say that this is not a hoax. At the very least Bashar's messages provide a highly integrated worldview that is inclusive of all religions, physics and known human understanding of life.. At the very most the information can be considered to be of great assistance to most people of Earth at this timing, if they were to hear the message.

I am happy to answer any questions you might have.

With appreciation for you as simply for being, Nick —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tunist (talk • contribs) 01:53, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Girls with brown hair and brown eyes[edit]

Hi, how were you able to determine that this user is BaT? Do you know more on this person's MO and etc? Triplestop x3 02:06, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yes, long experience with the particular features of this particular vandal. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:16, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nawlin is just that good. :) →javért stargaze 02:18, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nawlin, I think you need a separate "gripe" page for any and all complaints about your (excellent) deletions. Your talk page is starting to get cluttered! ;) Vicenarian (Said · Done) 02:44, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've also blocked Immunetoboons, who was on the same IP as the above user. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 03:27, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of page oxygen radio[edit]

You've deleted the article Oxygen Radio - yet it was specifically written in a way that was very similar to many other similar radio station that are already on Wikipedia. How come this one was singled out for deletion? Can you provide some evidence of where there was advertising on the page. What is your definition of "significant", as I provided a few references from 2 very well respected radio sites in the UK that only include content from professional radio stations.

Attacks[edit]

Hi there; I have semiprotected this page, as Grawp appears to be on school vacation and active again. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 11:56, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NawlinWiki/Archive_36&oldid=1140760558"